Cargando…

Axial morphology and 3D neurocranial kinematics in suction-feeding fishes

Many suction-feeding fish use neurocranial elevation to expand the buccal cavity for suction feeding, a motion necessarily accompanied by the dorsal flexion of joints in the axial skeleton. How much dorsal flexion the axial skeleton accommodates and where that dorsal flexion occurs may vary with axi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jimenez, Yordano E., Camp, Ariel L., Grindall, Jonathan D., Brainerd, Elizabeth L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Company of Biologists Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6176947/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30237249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/bio.036335
_version_ 1783361773382926336
author Jimenez, Yordano E.
Camp, Ariel L.
Grindall, Jonathan D.
Brainerd, Elizabeth L.
author_facet Jimenez, Yordano E.
Camp, Ariel L.
Grindall, Jonathan D.
Brainerd, Elizabeth L.
author_sort Jimenez, Yordano E.
collection PubMed
description Many suction-feeding fish use neurocranial elevation to expand the buccal cavity for suction feeding, a motion necessarily accompanied by the dorsal flexion of joints in the axial skeleton. How much dorsal flexion the axial skeleton accommodates and where that dorsal flexion occurs may vary with axial skeletal morphology, body shape and the kinematics of neurocranial elevation. We measured three-dimensional neurocranial kinematics in three species with distinct body forms: laterally compressed Embiotoca lateralis, fusiform Micropterus salmoides, and dorsoventrally compressed Leptocottus armatus. The area just caudal to the neurocranium occupied by bone was 42±1.5%, 36±1.8% and 22±5.5% (mean±s.e.m.; N=3, 6, 4) in the three species, respectively, and the epaxial depth also decreased from E. lateralis to L. armatus. Maximum neurocranial elevation for each species was 11, 24 and 37°, respectively, consistent with a hypothesis that aspects of axial morphology and body shape may constrain neurocranial elevation. Mean axis of rotation position for neurocranial elevation in E. lateralis, M. salmoides and L. armatus was near the first, third and fifth intervertebral joints, respectively, leading to the hypothesis of a similar relationship with the number of intervertebral joints that flex. Although future work must test these hypotheses, our results suggest the relationships merit further inquiry.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6176947
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Company of Biologists Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61769472018-10-11 Axial morphology and 3D neurocranial kinematics in suction-feeding fishes Jimenez, Yordano E. Camp, Ariel L. Grindall, Jonathan D. Brainerd, Elizabeth L. Biol Open Research Article Many suction-feeding fish use neurocranial elevation to expand the buccal cavity for suction feeding, a motion necessarily accompanied by the dorsal flexion of joints in the axial skeleton. How much dorsal flexion the axial skeleton accommodates and where that dorsal flexion occurs may vary with axial skeletal morphology, body shape and the kinematics of neurocranial elevation. We measured three-dimensional neurocranial kinematics in three species with distinct body forms: laterally compressed Embiotoca lateralis, fusiform Micropterus salmoides, and dorsoventrally compressed Leptocottus armatus. The area just caudal to the neurocranium occupied by bone was 42±1.5%, 36±1.8% and 22±5.5% (mean±s.e.m.; N=3, 6, 4) in the three species, respectively, and the epaxial depth also decreased from E. lateralis to L. armatus. Maximum neurocranial elevation for each species was 11, 24 and 37°, respectively, consistent with a hypothesis that aspects of axial morphology and body shape may constrain neurocranial elevation. Mean axis of rotation position for neurocranial elevation in E. lateralis, M. salmoides and L. armatus was near the first, third and fifth intervertebral joints, respectively, leading to the hypothesis of a similar relationship with the number of intervertebral joints that flex. Although future work must test these hypotheses, our results suggest the relationships merit further inquiry. The Company of Biologists Ltd 2018-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6176947/ /pubmed/30237249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/bio.036335 Text en © 2018. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jimenez, Yordano E.
Camp, Ariel L.
Grindall, Jonathan D.
Brainerd, Elizabeth L.
Axial morphology and 3D neurocranial kinematics in suction-feeding fishes
title Axial morphology and 3D neurocranial kinematics in suction-feeding fishes
title_full Axial morphology and 3D neurocranial kinematics in suction-feeding fishes
title_fullStr Axial morphology and 3D neurocranial kinematics in suction-feeding fishes
title_full_unstemmed Axial morphology and 3D neurocranial kinematics in suction-feeding fishes
title_short Axial morphology and 3D neurocranial kinematics in suction-feeding fishes
title_sort axial morphology and 3d neurocranial kinematics in suction-feeding fishes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6176947/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30237249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/bio.036335
work_keys_str_mv AT jimenezyordanoe axialmorphologyand3dneurocranialkinematicsinsuctionfeedingfishes
AT campariell axialmorphologyand3dneurocranialkinematicsinsuctionfeedingfishes
AT grindalljonathand axialmorphologyand3dneurocranialkinematicsinsuctionfeedingfishes
AT brainerdelizabethl axialmorphologyand3dneurocranialkinematicsinsuctionfeedingfishes