Cargando…

(Escaping) the paradox of scientific storytelling

Compelling stories about science can motivate people to engage and respond to relevant problems facing society. While science plays a unique role in society, providing the best available evidence for policy choices, understanding the world, and informing citizens’ daily lives, it does not hold any i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dahlstrom, Michael F., Scheufele, Dietram A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6177122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30300354
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2006720
_version_ 1783361812484325376
author Dahlstrom, Michael F.
Scheufele, Dietram A.
author_facet Dahlstrom, Michael F.
Scheufele, Dietram A.
author_sort Dahlstrom, Michael F.
collection PubMed
description Compelling stories about science can motivate people to engage and respond to relevant problems facing society. While science plays a unique role in society, providing the best available evidence for policy choices, understanding the world, and informing citizens’ daily lives, it does not hold any intrinsic advantage in creating captivating stories for mass audiences. Instead, science must compete with other storytellers, many of whom are not bound to scientific evidence. This presents a paradox—how can science preserve its credibility as curator of knowledge while engaging audiences with a communication format that is agnostic to truth?
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6177122
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61771222018-10-19 (Escaping) the paradox of scientific storytelling Dahlstrom, Michael F. Scheufele, Dietram A. PLoS Biol Perspective Compelling stories about science can motivate people to engage and respond to relevant problems facing society. While science plays a unique role in society, providing the best available evidence for policy choices, understanding the world, and informing citizens’ daily lives, it does not hold any intrinsic advantage in creating captivating stories for mass audiences. Instead, science must compete with other storytellers, many of whom are not bound to scientific evidence. This presents a paradox—how can science preserve its credibility as curator of knowledge while engaging audiences with a communication format that is agnostic to truth? Public Library of Science 2018-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6177122/ /pubmed/30300354 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2006720 Text en © 2018 Dahlstrom, Scheufele http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Perspective
Dahlstrom, Michael F.
Scheufele, Dietram A.
(Escaping) the paradox of scientific storytelling
title (Escaping) the paradox of scientific storytelling
title_full (Escaping) the paradox of scientific storytelling
title_fullStr (Escaping) the paradox of scientific storytelling
title_full_unstemmed (Escaping) the paradox of scientific storytelling
title_short (Escaping) the paradox of scientific storytelling
title_sort (escaping) the paradox of scientific storytelling
topic Perspective
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6177122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30300354
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2006720
work_keys_str_mv AT dahlstrommichaelf escapingtheparadoxofscientificstorytelling
AT scheufeledietrama escapingtheparadoxofscientificstorytelling