Cargando…
The comparison of two different intraarticular injections using a sonographic anterolateral approach in patients with osteoarthritic knee
BACKGROUND: The intraarticular (IA) injection has become popular for the management of the osteoarthritic knee without an effusion. The success rate of IA injection would be better if it was able to be visually confirmed. We hypothesized that an anterolateral approach, which targets the synovial mem...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Pain Society
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6177542/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30310554 http://dx.doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2018.31.4.289 |
_version_ | 1783361879404445696 |
---|---|
author | Choi, Jin Wook Lee, Jun Ho Ki, Minjong Kim, Myung Jong Kang, Sehrin Lee, Juhyung Lee, Jun-Rae Han, Young-Jin Son, Ji-Seon |
author_facet | Choi, Jin Wook Lee, Jun Ho Ki, Minjong Kim, Myung Jong Kang, Sehrin Lee, Juhyung Lee, Jun-Rae Han, Young-Jin Son, Ji-Seon |
author_sort | Choi, Jin Wook |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The intraarticular (IA) injection has become popular for the management of the osteoarthritic knee without an effusion. The success rate of IA injection would be better if it was able to be visually confirmed. We hypothesized that an anterolateral approach, which targets the synovial membrane of the lateral condyle using ultrasound, would provide an equivalent alternative to the anterolateral approach, targeting the synovial membrane of the medial condyle for IA injection of the knee. METHODS: A total of 96 knees with osteoarthritis were randomized placed into the two groups, which were group I (anterolateral approach to the medial condyle) and group II (anterolateral approach to the lateral condyle). The primary outcome was to compare the success rate of the two methods of IA injection. The required length of the needle for injection was also measured and compared. Pain intensity was assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale in order to evaluate the success of injection. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the success rate between both groups. The success rate of group I and group II were 87.8% (95%, CI 78.7–97.0) and 91.5% (95%, CI 83.6–99.5), respectively (P = 0.549). The needle depth was 5.0 ± 0.8 (3.0 to 6.1 cm) in group I, and 3.0 ± 0.8 (1.5 to 5 cm) in group II (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The anterolateral approach to the lateral femoral condyle, using ultrasound, is an alternative method to the approach targeting the medial femoral condyle, using shorter needle. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6177542 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | The Korean Pain Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61775422018-10-11 The comparison of two different intraarticular injections using a sonographic anterolateral approach in patients with osteoarthritic knee Choi, Jin Wook Lee, Jun Ho Ki, Minjong Kim, Myung Jong Kang, Sehrin Lee, Juhyung Lee, Jun-Rae Han, Young-Jin Son, Ji-Seon Korean J Pain Original Article BACKGROUND: The intraarticular (IA) injection has become popular for the management of the osteoarthritic knee without an effusion. The success rate of IA injection would be better if it was able to be visually confirmed. We hypothesized that an anterolateral approach, which targets the synovial membrane of the lateral condyle using ultrasound, would provide an equivalent alternative to the anterolateral approach, targeting the synovial membrane of the medial condyle for IA injection of the knee. METHODS: A total of 96 knees with osteoarthritis were randomized placed into the two groups, which were group I (anterolateral approach to the medial condyle) and group II (anterolateral approach to the lateral condyle). The primary outcome was to compare the success rate of the two methods of IA injection. The required length of the needle for injection was also measured and compared. Pain intensity was assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale in order to evaluate the success of injection. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the success rate between both groups. The success rate of group I and group II were 87.8% (95%, CI 78.7–97.0) and 91.5% (95%, CI 83.6–99.5), respectively (P = 0.549). The needle depth was 5.0 ± 0.8 (3.0 to 6.1 cm) in group I, and 3.0 ± 0.8 (1.5 to 5 cm) in group II (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The anterolateral approach to the lateral femoral condyle, using ultrasound, is an alternative method to the approach targeting the medial femoral condyle, using shorter needle. The Korean Pain Society 2018-10 2018-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6177542/ /pubmed/30310554 http://dx.doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2018.31.4.289 Text en Copyright © The Korean Pain Society, 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Choi, Jin Wook Lee, Jun Ho Ki, Minjong Kim, Myung Jong Kang, Sehrin Lee, Juhyung Lee, Jun-Rae Han, Young-Jin Son, Ji-Seon The comparison of two different intraarticular injections using a sonographic anterolateral approach in patients with osteoarthritic knee |
title | The comparison of two different intraarticular injections using a sonographic anterolateral approach in patients with osteoarthritic knee |
title_full | The comparison of two different intraarticular injections using a sonographic anterolateral approach in patients with osteoarthritic knee |
title_fullStr | The comparison of two different intraarticular injections using a sonographic anterolateral approach in patients with osteoarthritic knee |
title_full_unstemmed | The comparison of two different intraarticular injections using a sonographic anterolateral approach in patients with osteoarthritic knee |
title_short | The comparison of two different intraarticular injections using a sonographic anterolateral approach in patients with osteoarthritic knee |
title_sort | comparison of two different intraarticular injections using a sonographic anterolateral approach in patients with osteoarthritic knee |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6177542/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30310554 http://dx.doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2018.31.4.289 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT choijinwook thecomparisonoftwodifferentintraarticularinjectionsusingasonographicanterolateralapproachinpatientswithosteoarthriticknee AT leejunho thecomparisonoftwodifferentintraarticularinjectionsusingasonographicanterolateralapproachinpatientswithosteoarthriticknee AT kiminjong thecomparisonoftwodifferentintraarticularinjectionsusingasonographicanterolateralapproachinpatientswithosteoarthriticknee AT kimmyungjong thecomparisonoftwodifferentintraarticularinjectionsusingasonographicanterolateralapproachinpatientswithosteoarthriticknee AT kangsehrin thecomparisonoftwodifferentintraarticularinjectionsusingasonographicanterolateralapproachinpatientswithosteoarthriticknee AT leejuhyung thecomparisonoftwodifferentintraarticularinjectionsusingasonographicanterolateralapproachinpatientswithosteoarthriticknee AT leejunrae thecomparisonoftwodifferentintraarticularinjectionsusingasonographicanterolateralapproachinpatientswithosteoarthriticknee AT hanyoungjin thecomparisonoftwodifferentintraarticularinjectionsusingasonographicanterolateralapproachinpatientswithosteoarthriticknee AT sonjiseon thecomparisonoftwodifferentintraarticularinjectionsusingasonographicanterolateralapproachinpatientswithosteoarthriticknee AT choijinwook comparisonoftwodifferentintraarticularinjectionsusingasonographicanterolateralapproachinpatientswithosteoarthriticknee AT leejunho comparisonoftwodifferentintraarticularinjectionsusingasonographicanterolateralapproachinpatientswithosteoarthriticknee AT kiminjong comparisonoftwodifferentintraarticularinjectionsusingasonographicanterolateralapproachinpatientswithosteoarthriticknee AT kimmyungjong comparisonoftwodifferentintraarticularinjectionsusingasonographicanterolateralapproachinpatientswithosteoarthriticknee AT kangsehrin comparisonoftwodifferentintraarticularinjectionsusingasonographicanterolateralapproachinpatientswithosteoarthriticknee AT leejuhyung comparisonoftwodifferentintraarticularinjectionsusingasonographicanterolateralapproachinpatientswithosteoarthriticknee AT leejunrae comparisonoftwodifferentintraarticularinjectionsusingasonographicanterolateralapproachinpatientswithosteoarthriticknee AT hanyoungjin comparisonoftwodifferentintraarticularinjectionsusingasonographicanterolateralapproachinpatientswithosteoarthriticknee AT sonjiseon comparisonoftwodifferentintraarticularinjectionsusingasonographicanterolateralapproachinpatientswithosteoarthriticknee |