Cargando…

The comparison of two different intraarticular injections using a sonographic anterolateral approach in patients with osteoarthritic knee

BACKGROUND: The intraarticular (IA) injection has become popular for the management of the osteoarthritic knee without an effusion. The success rate of IA injection would be better if it was able to be visually confirmed. We hypothesized that an anterolateral approach, which targets the synovial mem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Jin Wook, Lee, Jun Ho, Ki, Minjong, Kim, Myung Jong, Kang, Sehrin, Lee, Juhyung, Lee, Jun-Rae, Han, Young-Jin, Son, Ji-Seon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Pain Society 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6177542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30310554
http://dx.doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2018.31.4.289
_version_ 1783361879404445696
author Choi, Jin Wook
Lee, Jun Ho
Ki, Minjong
Kim, Myung Jong
Kang, Sehrin
Lee, Juhyung
Lee, Jun-Rae
Han, Young-Jin
Son, Ji-Seon
author_facet Choi, Jin Wook
Lee, Jun Ho
Ki, Minjong
Kim, Myung Jong
Kang, Sehrin
Lee, Juhyung
Lee, Jun-Rae
Han, Young-Jin
Son, Ji-Seon
author_sort Choi, Jin Wook
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The intraarticular (IA) injection has become popular for the management of the osteoarthritic knee without an effusion. The success rate of IA injection would be better if it was able to be visually confirmed. We hypothesized that an anterolateral approach, which targets the synovial membrane of the lateral condyle using ultrasound, would provide an equivalent alternative to the anterolateral approach, targeting the synovial membrane of the medial condyle for IA injection of the knee. METHODS: A total of 96 knees with osteoarthritis were randomized placed into the two groups, which were group I (anterolateral approach to the medial condyle) and group II (anterolateral approach to the lateral condyle). The primary outcome was to compare the success rate of the two methods of IA injection. The required length of the needle for injection was also measured and compared. Pain intensity was assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale in order to evaluate the success of injection. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the success rate between both groups. The success rate of group I and group II were 87.8% (95%, CI 78.7–97.0) and 91.5% (95%, CI 83.6–99.5), respectively (P = 0.549). The needle depth was 5.0 ± 0.8 (3.0 to 6.1 cm) in group I, and 3.0 ± 0.8 (1.5 to 5 cm) in group II (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The anterolateral approach to the lateral femoral condyle, using ultrasound, is an alternative method to the approach targeting the medial femoral condyle, using shorter needle.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6177542
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Korean Pain Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61775422018-10-11 The comparison of two different intraarticular injections using a sonographic anterolateral approach in patients with osteoarthritic knee Choi, Jin Wook Lee, Jun Ho Ki, Minjong Kim, Myung Jong Kang, Sehrin Lee, Juhyung Lee, Jun-Rae Han, Young-Jin Son, Ji-Seon Korean J Pain Original Article BACKGROUND: The intraarticular (IA) injection has become popular for the management of the osteoarthritic knee without an effusion. The success rate of IA injection would be better if it was able to be visually confirmed. We hypothesized that an anterolateral approach, which targets the synovial membrane of the lateral condyle using ultrasound, would provide an equivalent alternative to the anterolateral approach, targeting the synovial membrane of the medial condyle for IA injection of the knee. METHODS: A total of 96 knees with osteoarthritis were randomized placed into the two groups, which were group I (anterolateral approach to the medial condyle) and group II (anterolateral approach to the lateral condyle). The primary outcome was to compare the success rate of the two methods of IA injection. The required length of the needle for injection was also measured and compared. Pain intensity was assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale in order to evaluate the success of injection. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the success rate between both groups. The success rate of group I and group II were 87.8% (95%, CI 78.7–97.0) and 91.5% (95%, CI 83.6–99.5), respectively (P = 0.549). The needle depth was 5.0 ± 0.8 (3.0 to 6.1 cm) in group I, and 3.0 ± 0.8 (1.5 to 5 cm) in group II (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The anterolateral approach to the lateral femoral condyle, using ultrasound, is an alternative method to the approach targeting the medial femoral condyle, using shorter needle. The Korean Pain Society 2018-10 2018-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6177542/ /pubmed/30310554 http://dx.doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2018.31.4.289 Text en Copyright © The Korean Pain Society, 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Choi, Jin Wook
Lee, Jun Ho
Ki, Minjong
Kim, Myung Jong
Kang, Sehrin
Lee, Juhyung
Lee, Jun-Rae
Han, Young-Jin
Son, Ji-Seon
The comparison of two different intraarticular injections using a sonographic anterolateral approach in patients with osteoarthritic knee
title The comparison of two different intraarticular injections using a sonographic anterolateral approach in patients with osteoarthritic knee
title_full The comparison of two different intraarticular injections using a sonographic anterolateral approach in patients with osteoarthritic knee
title_fullStr The comparison of two different intraarticular injections using a sonographic anterolateral approach in patients with osteoarthritic knee
title_full_unstemmed The comparison of two different intraarticular injections using a sonographic anterolateral approach in patients with osteoarthritic knee
title_short The comparison of two different intraarticular injections using a sonographic anterolateral approach in patients with osteoarthritic knee
title_sort comparison of two different intraarticular injections using a sonographic anterolateral approach in patients with osteoarthritic knee
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6177542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30310554
http://dx.doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2018.31.4.289
work_keys_str_mv AT choijinwook thecomparisonoftwodifferentintraarticularinjectionsusingasonographicanterolateralapproachinpatientswithosteoarthriticknee
AT leejunho thecomparisonoftwodifferentintraarticularinjectionsusingasonographicanterolateralapproachinpatientswithosteoarthriticknee
AT kiminjong thecomparisonoftwodifferentintraarticularinjectionsusingasonographicanterolateralapproachinpatientswithosteoarthriticknee
AT kimmyungjong thecomparisonoftwodifferentintraarticularinjectionsusingasonographicanterolateralapproachinpatientswithosteoarthriticknee
AT kangsehrin thecomparisonoftwodifferentintraarticularinjectionsusingasonographicanterolateralapproachinpatientswithosteoarthriticknee
AT leejuhyung thecomparisonoftwodifferentintraarticularinjectionsusingasonographicanterolateralapproachinpatientswithosteoarthriticknee
AT leejunrae thecomparisonoftwodifferentintraarticularinjectionsusingasonographicanterolateralapproachinpatientswithosteoarthriticknee
AT hanyoungjin thecomparisonoftwodifferentintraarticularinjectionsusingasonographicanterolateralapproachinpatientswithosteoarthriticknee
AT sonjiseon thecomparisonoftwodifferentintraarticularinjectionsusingasonographicanterolateralapproachinpatientswithosteoarthriticknee
AT choijinwook comparisonoftwodifferentintraarticularinjectionsusingasonographicanterolateralapproachinpatientswithosteoarthriticknee
AT leejunho comparisonoftwodifferentintraarticularinjectionsusingasonographicanterolateralapproachinpatientswithosteoarthriticknee
AT kiminjong comparisonoftwodifferentintraarticularinjectionsusingasonographicanterolateralapproachinpatientswithosteoarthriticknee
AT kimmyungjong comparisonoftwodifferentintraarticularinjectionsusingasonographicanterolateralapproachinpatientswithosteoarthriticknee
AT kangsehrin comparisonoftwodifferentintraarticularinjectionsusingasonographicanterolateralapproachinpatientswithosteoarthriticknee
AT leejuhyung comparisonoftwodifferentintraarticularinjectionsusingasonographicanterolateralapproachinpatientswithosteoarthriticknee
AT leejunrae comparisonoftwodifferentintraarticularinjectionsusingasonographicanterolateralapproachinpatientswithosteoarthriticknee
AT hanyoungjin comparisonoftwodifferentintraarticularinjectionsusingasonographicanterolateralapproachinpatientswithosteoarthriticknee
AT sonjiseon comparisonoftwodifferentintraarticularinjectionsusingasonographicanterolateralapproachinpatientswithosteoarthriticknee