Cargando…
In vitro and in silico analysis of the effects of D (2) receptor antagonist target binding kinetics on the cellular response to fluctuating dopamine concentrations
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Target binding kinetics influence the time course of the drug effect (pharmacodynamics) both (i) directly, by affecting the time course of target occupancy, driven by the pharmacokinetics of the drug, competition with endogenous ligands and target turnover, and (ii) indirectl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6177617/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30051456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.14456 |
_version_ | 1783361887195365376 |
---|---|
author | de Witte, Wilhelmus E A Versfelt, Joost W Kuzikov, Maria Rolland, Solene Georgi, Victoria Gribbon, Philip Gul, Sheraz Huntjens, Dymphy van der Graaf, Piet Hein Danhof, Meindert Fernández‐Montalván, Amaury Witt, Gesa de Lange, Elizabeth C M |
author_facet | de Witte, Wilhelmus E A Versfelt, Joost W Kuzikov, Maria Rolland, Solene Georgi, Victoria Gribbon, Philip Gul, Sheraz Huntjens, Dymphy van der Graaf, Piet Hein Danhof, Meindert Fernández‐Montalván, Amaury Witt, Gesa de Lange, Elizabeth C M |
author_sort | de Witte, Wilhelmus E A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Target binding kinetics influence the time course of the drug effect (pharmacodynamics) both (i) directly, by affecting the time course of target occupancy, driven by the pharmacokinetics of the drug, competition with endogenous ligands and target turnover, and (ii) indirectly, by affecting signal transduction and homeostatic feedback. For dopamine D(2) receptor antagonists, it has been hypothesized that fast receptor binding kinetics cause fewer side effects, because part of the dynamics of the dopaminergic system is preserved by displacement of these antagonists. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Target binding kinetics of D(2) receptor antagonists and signal transduction after dopamine and D(2) receptor antagonist exposure were measured in vitro. These data were integrated by mechanistic modelling, taking into account competitive binding of endogenous dopamine and the antagonist, the turnover of the second messenger cAMP and negative feedback by PDE turnover. KEY RESULTS: The proposed signal transduction model successfully described the cellular cAMP response for 17 D(2) receptor antagonists with widely different binding kinetics. Simulation of the response to fluctuating dopamine concentrations revealed that a significant effect of the target binding kinetics on the dynamics of the signalling only occurs at endogenous dopamine concentration fluctuations with frequencies below 1 min(−1). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Signal transduction and feedback are important determinants of the time course of drug effects. The effect of the D(2) receptor antagonist dissociation rate constant (k(off)) is limited to the maximal rate of fluctuations in dopamine signalling as determined by the dopamine k(off) and the cAMP turnover. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6177617 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61776172018-10-18 In vitro and in silico analysis of the effects of D (2) receptor antagonist target binding kinetics on the cellular response to fluctuating dopamine concentrations de Witte, Wilhelmus E A Versfelt, Joost W Kuzikov, Maria Rolland, Solene Georgi, Victoria Gribbon, Philip Gul, Sheraz Huntjens, Dymphy van der Graaf, Piet Hein Danhof, Meindert Fernández‐Montalván, Amaury Witt, Gesa de Lange, Elizabeth C M Br J Pharmacol Research Papers BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Target binding kinetics influence the time course of the drug effect (pharmacodynamics) both (i) directly, by affecting the time course of target occupancy, driven by the pharmacokinetics of the drug, competition with endogenous ligands and target turnover, and (ii) indirectly, by affecting signal transduction and homeostatic feedback. For dopamine D(2) receptor antagonists, it has been hypothesized that fast receptor binding kinetics cause fewer side effects, because part of the dynamics of the dopaminergic system is preserved by displacement of these antagonists. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Target binding kinetics of D(2) receptor antagonists and signal transduction after dopamine and D(2) receptor antagonist exposure were measured in vitro. These data were integrated by mechanistic modelling, taking into account competitive binding of endogenous dopamine and the antagonist, the turnover of the second messenger cAMP and negative feedback by PDE turnover. KEY RESULTS: The proposed signal transduction model successfully described the cellular cAMP response for 17 D(2) receptor antagonists with widely different binding kinetics. Simulation of the response to fluctuating dopamine concentrations revealed that a significant effect of the target binding kinetics on the dynamics of the signalling only occurs at endogenous dopamine concentration fluctuations with frequencies below 1 min(−1). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Signal transduction and feedback are important determinants of the time course of drug effects. The effect of the D(2) receptor antagonist dissociation rate constant (k(off)) is limited to the maximal rate of fluctuations in dopamine signalling as determined by the dopamine k(off) and the cAMP turnover. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-09-21 2018-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6177617/ /pubmed/30051456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.14456 Text en © 2018 The Authors British Journal of Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Research Papers de Witte, Wilhelmus E A Versfelt, Joost W Kuzikov, Maria Rolland, Solene Georgi, Victoria Gribbon, Philip Gul, Sheraz Huntjens, Dymphy van der Graaf, Piet Hein Danhof, Meindert Fernández‐Montalván, Amaury Witt, Gesa de Lange, Elizabeth C M In vitro and in silico analysis of the effects of D (2) receptor antagonist target binding kinetics on the cellular response to fluctuating dopamine concentrations |
title |
In vitro and in silico analysis of the effects of D
(2) receptor antagonist target binding kinetics on the cellular response to fluctuating dopamine concentrations |
title_full |
In vitro and in silico analysis of the effects of D
(2) receptor antagonist target binding kinetics on the cellular response to fluctuating dopamine concentrations |
title_fullStr |
In vitro and in silico analysis of the effects of D
(2) receptor antagonist target binding kinetics on the cellular response to fluctuating dopamine concentrations |
title_full_unstemmed |
In vitro and in silico analysis of the effects of D
(2) receptor antagonist target binding kinetics on the cellular response to fluctuating dopamine concentrations |
title_short |
In vitro and in silico analysis of the effects of D
(2) receptor antagonist target binding kinetics on the cellular response to fluctuating dopamine concentrations |
title_sort | in vitro and in silico analysis of the effects of d
(2) receptor antagonist target binding kinetics on the cellular response to fluctuating dopamine concentrations |
topic | Research Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6177617/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30051456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.14456 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dewittewilhelmusea invitroandinsilicoanalysisoftheeffectsofd2receptorantagonisttargetbindingkineticsonthecellularresponsetofluctuatingdopamineconcentrations AT versfeltjoostw invitroandinsilicoanalysisoftheeffectsofd2receptorantagonisttargetbindingkineticsonthecellularresponsetofluctuatingdopamineconcentrations AT kuzikovmaria invitroandinsilicoanalysisoftheeffectsofd2receptorantagonisttargetbindingkineticsonthecellularresponsetofluctuatingdopamineconcentrations AT rollandsolene invitroandinsilicoanalysisoftheeffectsofd2receptorantagonisttargetbindingkineticsonthecellularresponsetofluctuatingdopamineconcentrations AT georgivictoria invitroandinsilicoanalysisoftheeffectsofd2receptorantagonisttargetbindingkineticsonthecellularresponsetofluctuatingdopamineconcentrations AT gribbonphilip invitroandinsilicoanalysisoftheeffectsofd2receptorantagonisttargetbindingkineticsonthecellularresponsetofluctuatingdopamineconcentrations AT gulsheraz invitroandinsilicoanalysisoftheeffectsofd2receptorantagonisttargetbindingkineticsonthecellularresponsetofluctuatingdopamineconcentrations AT huntjensdymphy invitroandinsilicoanalysisoftheeffectsofd2receptorantagonisttargetbindingkineticsonthecellularresponsetofluctuatingdopamineconcentrations AT vandergraafpiethein invitroandinsilicoanalysisoftheeffectsofd2receptorantagonisttargetbindingkineticsonthecellularresponsetofluctuatingdopamineconcentrations AT danhofmeindert invitroandinsilicoanalysisoftheeffectsofd2receptorantagonisttargetbindingkineticsonthecellularresponsetofluctuatingdopamineconcentrations AT fernandezmontalvanamaury invitroandinsilicoanalysisoftheeffectsofd2receptorantagonisttargetbindingkineticsonthecellularresponsetofluctuatingdopamineconcentrations AT wittgesa invitroandinsilicoanalysisoftheeffectsofd2receptorantagonisttargetbindingkineticsonthecellularresponsetofluctuatingdopamineconcentrations AT delangeelizabethcm invitroandinsilicoanalysisoftheeffectsofd2receptorantagonisttargetbindingkineticsonthecellularresponsetofluctuatingdopamineconcentrations |