Cargando…

In vitro and in silico analysis of the effects of D (2) receptor antagonist target binding kinetics on the cellular response to fluctuating dopamine concentrations

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Target binding kinetics influence the time course of the drug effect (pharmacodynamics) both (i) directly, by affecting the time course of target occupancy, driven by the pharmacokinetics of the drug, competition with endogenous ligands and target turnover, and (ii) indirectl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Witte, Wilhelmus E A, Versfelt, Joost W, Kuzikov, Maria, Rolland, Solene, Georgi, Victoria, Gribbon, Philip, Gul, Sheraz, Huntjens, Dymphy, van der Graaf, Piet Hein, Danhof, Meindert, Fernández‐Montalván, Amaury, Witt, Gesa, de Lange, Elizabeth C M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6177617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30051456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.14456
_version_ 1783361887195365376
author de Witte, Wilhelmus E A
Versfelt, Joost W
Kuzikov, Maria
Rolland, Solene
Georgi, Victoria
Gribbon, Philip
Gul, Sheraz
Huntjens, Dymphy
van der Graaf, Piet Hein
Danhof, Meindert
Fernández‐Montalván, Amaury
Witt, Gesa
de Lange, Elizabeth C M
author_facet de Witte, Wilhelmus E A
Versfelt, Joost W
Kuzikov, Maria
Rolland, Solene
Georgi, Victoria
Gribbon, Philip
Gul, Sheraz
Huntjens, Dymphy
van der Graaf, Piet Hein
Danhof, Meindert
Fernández‐Montalván, Amaury
Witt, Gesa
de Lange, Elizabeth C M
author_sort de Witte, Wilhelmus E A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Target binding kinetics influence the time course of the drug effect (pharmacodynamics) both (i) directly, by affecting the time course of target occupancy, driven by the pharmacokinetics of the drug, competition with endogenous ligands and target turnover, and (ii) indirectly, by affecting signal transduction and homeostatic feedback. For dopamine D(2) receptor antagonists, it has been hypothesized that fast receptor binding kinetics cause fewer side effects, because part of the dynamics of the dopaminergic system is preserved by displacement of these antagonists. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Target binding kinetics of D(2) receptor antagonists and signal transduction after dopamine and D(2) receptor antagonist exposure were measured in vitro. These data were integrated by mechanistic modelling, taking into account competitive binding of endogenous dopamine and the antagonist, the turnover of the second messenger cAMP and negative feedback by PDE turnover. KEY RESULTS: The proposed signal transduction model successfully described the cellular cAMP response for 17 D(2) receptor antagonists with widely different binding kinetics. Simulation of the response to fluctuating dopamine concentrations revealed that a significant effect of the target binding kinetics on the dynamics of the signalling only occurs at endogenous dopamine concentration fluctuations with frequencies below 1 min(−1). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Signal transduction and feedback are important determinants of the time course of drug effects. The effect of the D(2) receptor antagonist dissociation rate constant (k(off)) is limited to the maximal rate of fluctuations in dopamine signalling as determined by the dopamine k(off) and the cAMP turnover.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6177617
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61776172018-10-18 In vitro and in silico analysis of the effects of D (2) receptor antagonist target binding kinetics on the cellular response to fluctuating dopamine concentrations de Witte, Wilhelmus E A Versfelt, Joost W Kuzikov, Maria Rolland, Solene Georgi, Victoria Gribbon, Philip Gul, Sheraz Huntjens, Dymphy van der Graaf, Piet Hein Danhof, Meindert Fernández‐Montalván, Amaury Witt, Gesa de Lange, Elizabeth C M Br J Pharmacol Research Papers BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Target binding kinetics influence the time course of the drug effect (pharmacodynamics) both (i) directly, by affecting the time course of target occupancy, driven by the pharmacokinetics of the drug, competition with endogenous ligands and target turnover, and (ii) indirectly, by affecting signal transduction and homeostatic feedback. For dopamine D(2) receptor antagonists, it has been hypothesized that fast receptor binding kinetics cause fewer side effects, because part of the dynamics of the dopaminergic system is preserved by displacement of these antagonists. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Target binding kinetics of D(2) receptor antagonists and signal transduction after dopamine and D(2) receptor antagonist exposure were measured in vitro. These data were integrated by mechanistic modelling, taking into account competitive binding of endogenous dopamine and the antagonist, the turnover of the second messenger cAMP and negative feedback by PDE turnover. KEY RESULTS: The proposed signal transduction model successfully described the cellular cAMP response for 17 D(2) receptor antagonists with widely different binding kinetics. Simulation of the response to fluctuating dopamine concentrations revealed that a significant effect of the target binding kinetics on the dynamics of the signalling only occurs at endogenous dopamine concentration fluctuations with frequencies below 1 min(−1). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Signal transduction and feedback are important determinants of the time course of drug effects. The effect of the D(2) receptor antagonist dissociation rate constant (k(off)) is limited to the maximal rate of fluctuations in dopamine signalling as determined by the dopamine k(off) and the cAMP turnover. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-09-21 2018-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6177617/ /pubmed/30051456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.14456 Text en © 2018 The Authors British Journal of Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Papers
de Witte, Wilhelmus E A
Versfelt, Joost W
Kuzikov, Maria
Rolland, Solene
Georgi, Victoria
Gribbon, Philip
Gul, Sheraz
Huntjens, Dymphy
van der Graaf, Piet Hein
Danhof, Meindert
Fernández‐Montalván, Amaury
Witt, Gesa
de Lange, Elizabeth C M
In vitro and in silico analysis of the effects of D (2) receptor antagonist target binding kinetics on the cellular response to fluctuating dopamine concentrations
title In vitro and in silico analysis of the effects of D (2) receptor antagonist target binding kinetics on the cellular response to fluctuating dopamine concentrations
title_full In vitro and in silico analysis of the effects of D (2) receptor antagonist target binding kinetics on the cellular response to fluctuating dopamine concentrations
title_fullStr In vitro and in silico analysis of the effects of D (2) receptor antagonist target binding kinetics on the cellular response to fluctuating dopamine concentrations
title_full_unstemmed In vitro and in silico analysis of the effects of D (2) receptor antagonist target binding kinetics on the cellular response to fluctuating dopamine concentrations
title_short In vitro and in silico analysis of the effects of D (2) receptor antagonist target binding kinetics on the cellular response to fluctuating dopamine concentrations
title_sort in vitro and in silico analysis of the effects of d (2) receptor antagonist target binding kinetics on the cellular response to fluctuating dopamine concentrations
topic Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6177617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30051456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.14456
work_keys_str_mv AT dewittewilhelmusea invitroandinsilicoanalysisoftheeffectsofd2receptorantagonisttargetbindingkineticsonthecellularresponsetofluctuatingdopamineconcentrations
AT versfeltjoostw invitroandinsilicoanalysisoftheeffectsofd2receptorantagonisttargetbindingkineticsonthecellularresponsetofluctuatingdopamineconcentrations
AT kuzikovmaria invitroandinsilicoanalysisoftheeffectsofd2receptorantagonisttargetbindingkineticsonthecellularresponsetofluctuatingdopamineconcentrations
AT rollandsolene invitroandinsilicoanalysisoftheeffectsofd2receptorantagonisttargetbindingkineticsonthecellularresponsetofluctuatingdopamineconcentrations
AT georgivictoria invitroandinsilicoanalysisoftheeffectsofd2receptorantagonisttargetbindingkineticsonthecellularresponsetofluctuatingdopamineconcentrations
AT gribbonphilip invitroandinsilicoanalysisoftheeffectsofd2receptorantagonisttargetbindingkineticsonthecellularresponsetofluctuatingdopamineconcentrations
AT gulsheraz invitroandinsilicoanalysisoftheeffectsofd2receptorantagonisttargetbindingkineticsonthecellularresponsetofluctuatingdopamineconcentrations
AT huntjensdymphy invitroandinsilicoanalysisoftheeffectsofd2receptorantagonisttargetbindingkineticsonthecellularresponsetofluctuatingdopamineconcentrations
AT vandergraafpiethein invitroandinsilicoanalysisoftheeffectsofd2receptorantagonisttargetbindingkineticsonthecellularresponsetofluctuatingdopamineconcentrations
AT danhofmeindert invitroandinsilicoanalysisoftheeffectsofd2receptorantagonisttargetbindingkineticsonthecellularresponsetofluctuatingdopamineconcentrations
AT fernandezmontalvanamaury invitroandinsilicoanalysisoftheeffectsofd2receptorantagonisttargetbindingkineticsonthecellularresponsetofluctuatingdopamineconcentrations
AT wittgesa invitroandinsilicoanalysisoftheeffectsofd2receptorantagonisttargetbindingkineticsonthecellularresponsetofluctuatingdopamineconcentrations
AT delangeelizabethcm invitroandinsilicoanalysisoftheeffectsofd2receptorantagonisttargetbindingkineticsonthecellularresponsetofluctuatingdopamineconcentrations