Cargando…

Effect of the combination of motor imagery and electrical stimulation on upper extremity motor function in patients with chronic stroke: preliminary results

BACKGROUND: The combination of motor imagery (MI) and afferent input with electrical stimulation (ES) enhances the excitability of the corticospinal tract compared with motor imagery alone or electrical stimulation alone. However, its therapeutic effect is unknown in patients with hemiparetic stroke...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Okuyama, Kohei, Ogura, Miho, Kawakami, Michiyuki, Tsujimoto, Kengo, Okada, Kohsuke, Miwa, Kazuma, Takahashi, Yoko, Abe, Kaoru, Tanabe, Shigeo, Yamaguchi, Tomofumi, Liu, Meigen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6178123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30327684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756286418804785
_version_ 1783361908600995840
author Okuyama, Kohei
Ogura, Miho
Kawakami, Michiyuki
Tsujimoto, Kengo
Okada, Kohsuke
Miwa, Kazuma
Takahashi, Yoko
Abe, Kaoru
Tanabe, Shigeo
Yamaguchi, Tomofumi
Liu, Meigen
author_facet Okuyama, Kohei
Ogura, Miho
Kawakami, Michiyuki
Tsujimoto, Kengo
Okada, Kohsuke
Miwa, Kazuma
Takahashi, Yoko
Abe, Kaoru
Tanabe, Shigeo
Yamaguchi, Tomofumi
Liu, Meigen
author_sort Okuyama, Kohei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The combination of motor imagery (MI) and afferent input with electrical stimulation (ES) enhances the excitability of the corticospinal tract compared with motor imagery alone or electrical stimulation alone. However, its therapeutic effect is unknown in patients with hemiparetic stroke. We performed a preliminary examination of the therapeutic effects of MI + ES on upper extremity (UE) motor function in patients with chronic stroke. METHODS: A total of 10 patients with chronic stroke demonstrating severe hemiparesis participated. The imagined task was extension of the affected finger. Peripheral nerve electrical stimulation was applied to the radial nerve at the spiral groove. MI + ES intervention was conducted for 10 days. UE motor function as assessed with the Fugl–Meyer assessment UE motor score (FMA-UE), the amount of the affected UE use in daily life as assessed with a Motor Activity Log (MAL-AOU), and the degree of hypertonia in flexor muscles as assessed with the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) were evaluated before and after intervention. To assess the change in spinal neural circuits, reciprocal inhibition between forearm extensor and flexor muscles with the H reflex conditioning-test paradigm at interstimulus intervals (ISIs) of 0, 20, and 100 ms were measured before and after intervention. RESULTS: UE motor function, the amount of the affected UE use, and muscle hypertonia in flexor muscles were significantly improved after MI + ES intervention (FMA-UE: p < 0.01, MAL-AOU: p < 0.01, MAS: p = 0.02). Neurophysiologically, the intervention induced restoration of reciprocal inhibition from the forearm extensor to the flexor muscles (ISI at 0 ms: p = 0.03, ISI at 20 ms: p = 0.03, ISI at 100 ms: p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: MI + ES intervention was effective for improving UE motor function in patients with severe paralysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6178123
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61781232018-10-16 Effect of the combination of motor imagery and electrical stimulation on upper extremity motor function in patients with chronic stroke: preliminary results Okuyama, Kohei Ogura, Miho Kawakami, Michiyuki Tsujimoto, Kengo Okada, Kohsuke Miwa, Kazuma Takahashi, Yoko Abe, Kaoru Tanabe, Shigeo Yamaguchi, Tomofumi Liu, Meigen Ther Adv Neurol Disord Original Research BACKGROUND: The combination of motor imagery (MI) and afferent input with electrical stimulation (ES) enhances the excitability of the corticospinal tract compared with motor imagery alone or electrical stimulation alone. However, its therapeutic effect is unknown in patients with hemiparetic stroke. We performed a preliminary examination of the therapeutic effects of MI + ES on upper extremity (UE) motor function in patients with chronic stroke. METHODS: A total of 10 patients with chronic stroke demonstrating severe hemiparesis participated. The imagined task was extension of the affected finger. Peripheral nerve electrical stimulation was applied to the radial nerve at the spiral groove. MI + ES intervention was conducted for 10 days. UE motor function as assessed with the Fugl–Meyer assessment UE motor score (FMA-UE), the amount of the affected UE use in daily life as assessed with a Motor Activity Log (MAL-AOU), and the degree of hypertonia in flexor muscles as assessed with the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) were evaluated before and after intervention. To assess the change in spinal neural circuits, reciprocal inhibition between forearm extensor and flexor muscles with the H reflex conditioning-test paradigm at interstimulus intervals (ISIs) of 0, 20, and 100 ms were measured before and after intervention. RESULTS: UE motor function, the amount of the affected UE use, and muscle hypertonia in flexor muscles were significantly improved after MI + ES intervention (FMA-UE: p < 0.01, MAL-AOU: p < 0.01, MAS: p = 0.02). Neurophysiologically, the intervention induced restoration of reciprocal inhibition from the forearm extensor to the flexor muscles (ISI at 0 ms: p = 0.03, ISI at 20 ms: p = 0.03, ISI at 100 ms: p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: MI + ES intervention was effective for improving UE motor function in patients with severe paralysis. SAGE Publications 2018-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6178123/ /pubmed/30327684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756286418804785 Text en © The Author(s), 2018 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Okuyama, Kohei
Ogura, Miho
Kawakami, Michiyuki
Tsujimoto, Kengo
Okada, Kohsuke
Miwa, Kazuma
Takahashi, Yoko
Abe, Kaoru
Tanabe, Shigeo
Yamaguchi, Tomofumi
Liu, Meigen
Effect of the combination of motor imagery and electrical stimulation on upper extremity motor function in patients with chronic stroke: preliminary results
title Effect of the combination of motor imagery and electrical stimulation on upper extremity motor function in patients with chronic stroke: preliminary results
title_full Effect of the combination of motor imagery and electrical stimulation on upper extremity motor function in patients with chronic stroke: preliminary results
title_fullStr Effect of the combination of motor imagery and electrical stimulation on upper extremity motor function in patients with chronic stroke: preliminary results
title_full_unstemmed Effect of the combination of motor imagery and electrical stimulation on upper extremity motor function in patients with chronic stroke: preliminary results
title_short Effect of the combination of motor imagery and electrical stimulation on upper extremity motor function in patients with chronic stroke: preliminary results
title_sort effect of the combination of motor imagery and electrical stimulation on upper extremity motor function in patients with chronic stroke: preliminary results
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6178123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30327684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756286418804785
work_keys_str_mv AT okuyamakohei effectofthecombinationofmotorimageryandelectricalstimulationonupperextremitymotorfunctioninpatientswithchronicstrokepreliminaryresults
AT oguramiho effectofthecombinationofmotorimageryandelectricalstimulationonupperextremitymotorfunctioninpatientswithchronicstrokepreliminaryresults
AT kawakamimichiyuki effectofthecombinationofmotorimageryandelectricalstimulationonupperextremitymotorfunctioninpatientswithchronicstrokepreliminaryresults
AT tsujimotokengo effectofthecombinationofmotorimageryandelectricalstimulationonupperextremitymotorfunctioninpatientswithchronicstrokepreliminaryresults
AT okadakohsuke effectofthecombinationofmotorimageryandelectricalstimulationonupperextremitymotorfunctioninpatientswithchronicstrokepreliminaryresults
AT miwakazuma effectofthecombinationofmotorimageryandelectricalstimulationonupperextremitymotorfunctioninpatientswithchronicstrokepreliminaryresults
AT takahashiyoko effectofthecombinationofmotorimageryandelectricalstimulationonupperextremitymotorfunctioninpatientswithchronicstrokepreliminaryresults
AT abekaoru effectofthecombinationofmotorimageryandelectricalstimulationonupperextremitymotorfunctioninpatientswithchronicstrokepreliminaryresults
AT tanabeshigeo effectofthecombinationofmotorimageryandelectricalstimulationonupperextremitymotorfunctioninpatientswithchronicstrokepreliminaryresults
AT yamaguchitomofumi effectofthecombinationofmotorimageryandelectricalstimulationonupperextremitymotorfunctioninpatientswithchronicstrokepreliminaryresults
AT liumeigen effectofthecombinationofmotorimageryandelectricalstimulationonupperextremitymotorfunctioninpatientswithchronicstrokepreliminaryresults