Cargando…

MRI findings guiding selection of active surveillance for prostate cancer: a review of emerging evidence

Active surveillance (AS) for prostate cancer (PCa) is generally considered to be a safe strategy for men with low-risk, localized disease. However, as many as 1 in 4 patients may be incorrectly classified as AS-eligible using traditional inclusion criteria. The use of multiparametric magnetic resona...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Glaser, Zachary A., Porter, Kristin K., Thomas, John V., Gordetsky, Jennifer B., Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6178314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30363494
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2018.03.21
_version_ 1783361942925082624
author Glaser, Zachary A.
Porter, Kristin K.
Thomas, John V.
Gordetsky, Jennifer B.
Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
author_facet Glaser, Zachary A.
Porter, Kristin K.
Thomas, John V.
Gordetsky, Jennifer B.
Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
author_sort Glaser, Zachary A.
collection PubMed
description Active surveillance (AS) for prostate cancer (PCa) is generally considered to be a safe strategy for men with low-risk, localized disease. However, as many as 1 in 4 patients may be incorrectly classified as AS-eligible using traditional inclusion criteria. The use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) may offer improved risk stratification in both the initial diagnostic and disease monitoring setting. We performed a review of recently published studies to evaluate the utility of this imaging modality for this clinical setting. An English literature search was conducted on PubMed for original investigations on localized PCa, AS, and magnetic resonance imaging. Our Boolean criteria included the following terms: PCa, AS, imaging, MRI, mpMRI, prospective, retrospective, and comparative. Our search excluded publication types such as comments, editorials, guidelines, reviews, or interviews. Our literature review identified 71 original investigations. Among these, 52 met our inclusion criteria. Evidence suggests mpMRI improves characterization of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) foci, and the enhanced detection and risk-stratification afforded by this modality may keep men from being inappropriately placed on AS. Use of serial mpMRI may also permit longer intervals between confirmatory biopsies. Multiple studies demonstrate the benefit of MRI-targeted biopsies. The use of mpMRI of the prostate offers improved confidence in risk-stratification for men with clinically low-risk PCa considering AS. While on AS, serial mpMRI and MRI-targeted biopsy aid in the detection of aggressive disease transformation or foci of clinically-significant cancer undetected on prior biopsy sessions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6178314
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61783142018-10-24 MRI findings guiding selection of active surveillance for prostate cancer: a review of emerging evidence Glaser, Zachary A. Porter, Kristin K. Thomas, John V. Gordetsky, Jennifer B. Rais-Bahrami, Soroush Transl Androl Urol Review Article Active surveillance (AS) for prostate cancer (PCa) is generally considered to be a safe strategy for men with low-risk, localized disease. However, as many as 1 in 4 patients may be incorrectly classified as AS-eligible using traditional inclusion criteria. The use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) may offer improved risk stratification in both the initial diagnostic and disease monitoring setting. We performed a review of recently published studies to evaluate the utility of this imaging modality for this clinical setting. An English literature search was conducted on PubMed for original investigations on localized PCa, AS, and magnetic resonance imaging. Our Boolean criteria included the following terms: PCa, AS, imaging, MRI, mpMRI, prospective, retrospective, and comparative. Our search excluded publication types such as comments, editorials, guidelines, reviews, or interviews. Our literature review identified 71 original investigations. Among these, 52 met our inclusion criteria. Evidence suggests mpMRI improves characterization of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) foci, and the enhanced detection and risk-stratification afforded by this modality may keep men from being inappropriately placed on AS. Use of serial mpMRI may also permit longer intervals between confirmatory biopsies. Multiple studies demonstrate the benefit of MRI-targeted biopsies. The use of mpMRI of the prostate offers improved confidence in risk-stratification for men with clinically low-risk PCa considering AS. While on AS, serial mpMRI and MRI-targeted biopsy aid in the detection of aggressive disease transformation or foci of clinically-significant cancer undetected on prior biopsy sessions. AME Publishing Company 2018-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6178314/ /pubmed/30363494 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2018.03.21 Text en 2018 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved.
spellingShingle Review Article
Glaser, Zachary A.
Porter, Kristin K.
Thomas, John V.
Gordetsky, Jennifer B.
Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
MRI findings guiding selection of active surveillance for prostate cancer: a review of emerging evidence
title MRI findings guiding selection of active surveillance for prostate cancer: a review of emerging evidence
title_full MRI findings guiding selection of active surveillance for prostate cancer: a review of emerging evidence
title_fullStr MRI findings guiding selection of active surveillance for prostate cancer: a review of emerging evidence
title_full_unstemmed MRI findings guiding selection of active surveillance for prostate cancer: a review of emerging evidence
title_short MRI findings guiding selection of active surveillance for prostate cancer: a review of emerging evidence
title_sort mri findings guiding selection of active surveillance for prostate cancer: a review of emerging evidence
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6178314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30363494
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2018.03.21
work_keys_str_mv AT glaserzacharya mrifindingsguidingselectionofactivesurveillanceforprostatecancerareviewofemergingevidence
AT porterkristink mrifindingsguidingselectionofactivesurveillanceforprostatecancerareviewofemergingevidence
AT thomasjohnv mrifindingsguidingselectionofactivesurveillanceforprostatecancerareviewofemergingevidence
AT gordetskyjenniferb mrifindingsguidingselectionofactivesurveillanceforprostatecancerareviewofemergingevidence
AT raisbahramisoroush mrifindingsguidingselectionofactivesurveillanceforprostatecancerareviewofemergingevidence