Cargando…

Clinical significance of subtypes of Gleason pattern 4 prostate cancer

Major updates in prostate cancer grading have been adopted in recent times. These include redefinitions of Gleason pattern (GP) 4 architectural variants and reporting of the grade group (GG) system, which divides prostate cancer into five groups that better stratify patients. Still, the GG system us...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Hassan, Oudai, Matoso, Andres
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	AME Publishing Company 2018
Materias:	Review Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6178320/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30363452 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2018.02.06

Ejemplares similares

Beyond the Gleason score: the prognostic significance of prostate cancer subtypes
por: Flood, Trevor A., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Percent Gleason pattern 4 in stratifying the prognosis of patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer
por: Sharma, Meenal, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Biochemical Recurrence in Gleason Score 7 Prostate Cancer in Korean Men: Significance of the Primary Gleason Grade
por: Ro, Yun Kwan, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Cribriform architecture outperforms Gleason pattern 4 percentage and tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in predicting the outcome of Grade Group 2 prostate cancer patients
por: Seyrek, Neslisah, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

The highest percentage of Gleason Pattern 4 is a predictor in intermediate‐risk prostate cancer
por: Sato, Shun, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Inter-observer variability of cribriform architecture and percent Gleason pattern 4 in prostate cancer: relation to clinical outcome
por: van der Slot, Margaretha A., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Recent updates on the role of microRNAs in prostate cancer
por: Hassan, Oudai, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Prognostic Impact of Different Gleason Patterns on Biopsy Within Grade Group 4 Prostate Cancer
por: Mori, Keiichiro, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Comedonecrosis Gleason pattern 5 is associated with worse clinical outcome in operated prostate cancer patients
por: Hansum, Tim, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Impact of Gleason Pattern 5 on outcomes of patients with prostate cancer and iodine-125 prostate brachytherapy
por: Makino, Tomoyuki, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Artificial intelligence assistance significantly improves Gleason grading of prostate biopsies by pathologists
por: Bulten, Wouter, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Significance of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in patients with Gleason score 7 after radical prostatectomy: a retrospective cohort study
por: Li, Jiakun, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Prostate cancer growth patterns beyond the Gleason score: entering a new era of comprehensive tumour grading
por: van Leenders, Geert J L H, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The gut microbiota associated with high‐Gleason prostate cancer
por: Matsushita, Makoto, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Molecular characterization of Gleason patterns 3 and 4 prostate cancer using reverse Warburg effect-associated genes
por: Georgescu, Ilinca, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Gleason 6 prostate cancer: That which cannot be named
por: Burke, Harry B.
Publicado: (2022)

The Urine Biomarker PUR-4 Is Positively Associated with the Amount of Gleason 4 in Human Prostate Cancers
por: Ball, Richard Y., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

AB177. Clinical and pathological research of prostate cancer with Gleason score 10
por: Yan, Bin, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Multimodal Radiomic Features for the Predicting Gleason Score of Prostate Cancer
por: Chaddad, Ahmad, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Machine learning classifiers can predict Gleason pattern 4 prostate cancer with greater accuracy than experienced radiologists
por: Antonelli, Michela, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Hypoehoic lesions on Transrectal Ultrasound and its correlation to Gleason grade in the diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Study
por: Sharma, Manas, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Distinct Adverse Clinical Outcomes of Small and Large Cribriform Patterns on Gleason 7 Prostate Cancer: A Preliminary Study
por: Kazan, Ozgur, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Cribriform pattern does not have a significant impact in Gleason Score ≥7/ISUP Grade ≥2 prostate cancers submitted to radical prostatectomy
por: Flammia, Simone, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Differences in survival of prostate cancer Gleason 8–10 disease and the establishment of a new Gleason survival grading system
por: Zhou, Yuan, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Prostate-Specific Antigen Density and Gleason Score Predict Adverse Pathologic Features in Patients with Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer
por: Nowroozi, Mohammad Reza, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Incidence of metastasis and prostate-specific antigen levels at diagnosis in Gleason 3+4 versus 4+3 prostate cancer
por: Kamel, Mohamed H., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Deep learning for automatic Gleason pattern classification for grade group determination of prostate biopsies
por: Lucas, Marit, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Clinical Significance of a Large Difference (≥ 2 points) between Biopsy and Post-prostatectomy Pathological Gleason Scores in Patients with Prostate Cancer
por: Yoo, Changhee, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Quantification of the individual risk of each Gleason pattern, including tertiary Gleason pattern 5, after radical prostatectomy: development of the modified Gleason grade grouping (mGGG) model
por: Taguchi, Satoru, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

ARRDC4 and UBXN1: Novel Target Genes Correlated with Prostate Cancer Gleason Score
por: Oh, Jong Jin, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Significant Inter- and Intralaboratory Variation in Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer: A Nationwide Study of 35,258 Patients in The Netherlands
por: Flach, Rachel N., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Clinically applicable Gleason grading (GD) system for prostate cancer based on deep learning
por: Niu, Yun, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Oncologic Outcomes of Patients With Gleason Score 7 and Tertiary Gleason Pattern 5 After Radical Prostatectomy
por: Leng, Yi-Hsueh, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and Gleason grading of prostate cancer: the PANDA challenge
por: Bulten, Wouter, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Percentage Gleason pattern 4 and PI-RADS score predict upgrading in biopsy Grade Group 2 prostate cancer patients without cribriform pattern
por: van der Slot, Margaretha A., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Quantification of Gleason Pattern 4 at MRI-Guided Biopsy to Predict Adverse Pathology at Radical Prostatectomy in Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients
por: Kamecki, Hubert, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Correlation of Gleason Scores with Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Findings of Prostate Cancer
por: Nagarajan, Rajakumar, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Favorable intermediate risk prostate cancer with biopsy Gleason score of 6
por: Oh, Jong Jin, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Molecular risk classifier score and biochemical recurrence risk are associated with cribriform pattern type in Gleason 3+4=7 prostate cancer
por: Greenland, Nancy Y., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

CRMP4 CpG Hypermethylation Predicts Upgrading to Gleason Score ≥ 8 in Prostate Cancer
por: Qin, Xiao-Ping, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_n3irsha7u083blqmsnp0ajied4