Cargando…

Emotion Regulation in Generalized Anxiety and Social Anxiety: Examining the Distinct and Shared Use of Emotion Regulation Strategies

Objective: According to the transdiagnostic view, emotion regulation strategies are common among emotional disorders. Despite the vast majority of studies demonstrating the common role of emotion regulation strategies in emotional disorders including generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and social anx...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abasi, Imaneh, Dolatshahi, Behrouz, Farazmand, Shirin, Pourshahbaz, Abbas, Tamanaeefar, Shima
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Psychiatry & Psychology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6178328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30319698
_version_ 1783361946195591168
author Abasi, Imaneh
Dolatshahi, Behrouz
Farazmand, Shirin
Pourshahbaz, Abbas
Tamanaeefar, Shima
author_facet Abasi, Imaneh
Dolatshahi, Behrouz
Farazmand, Shirin
Pourshahbaz, Abbas
Tamanaeefar, Shima
author_sort Abasi, Imaneh
collection PubMed
description Objective: According to the transdiagnostic view, emotion regulation strategies are common among emotional disorders. Despite the vast majority of studies demonstrating the common role of emotion regulation strategies in emotional disorders including generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and social anxiety disorder (SAD), distinct functions of these strategies are largely unknown. So, the aim of the present study was to assess the distinct and shared use of emotion regulation strategies in individuals with GAD and SAD symptoms. Method : Participants were recruited from a community sample of Tehran using purposive sampling method. The sample (N = 346) consisted of 269 nonclinical individuals, 47 individuals with generalized anxiety symptoms, and 30 individuals with social anxiety symptoms. Informed consent was obtained from all the participants and they were asked to fill in a series of self -report questionnaires including GAD-IV, SIAS, DERS, EQ, ACS, and RRS. Data were analyzed by discriminant function analysis using SPSS-23. Results: Findings revealed significant differences between the 3 groups in non-acceptance, focusing, shifting, brooding, and decentering (P<0.01). Results of discriminant function analysis showed 2 functions: the first accounted for 87.4% of the variance (Wilk`s Lambda = 0.81, df = 10, P<0.01, χ2 = 70.06), and the second for 12.6% of the variance (Wilk`s Lambda = 0.97, df = 4, P<0.05, χ2 = 9.43) of between group variability. Non-acceptance and focusing discriminated GAD and SAD the most. Conclusion: The findings of the present study support both splitter and lumper approaches as there were some emotion regulation strategies common between GAD and SAD, including shifting, decentering, and brooding. However, some of them were distinct, such as focusing and non-acceptance. Nevertheless, there are still inconsistencies in research about the findings, and thus examining the pathways may illuminate these findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6178328
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Psychiatry & Psychology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61783282018-10-12 Emotion Regulation in Generalized Anxiety and Social Anxiety: Examining the Distinct and Shared Use of Emotion Regulation Strategies Abasi, Imaneh Dolatshahi, Behrouz Farazmand, Shirin Pourshahbaz, Abbas Tamanaeefar, Shima Iran J Psychiatry Original Article Objective: According to the transdiagnostic view, emotion regulation strategies are common among emotional disorders. Despite the vast majority of studies demonstrating the common role of emotion regulation strategies in emotional disorders including generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and social anxiety disorder (SAD), distinct functions of these strategies are largely unknown. So, the aim of the present study was to assess the distinct and shared use of emotion regulation strategies in individuals with GAD and SAD symptoms. Method : Participants were recruited from a community sample of Tehran using purposive sampling method. The sample (N = 346) consisted of 269 nonclinical individuals, 47 individuals with generalized anxiety symptoms, and 30 individuals with social anxiety symptoms. Informed consent was obtained from all the participants and they were asked to fill in a series of self -report questionnaires including GAD-IV, SIAS, DERS, EQ, ACS, and RRS. Data were analyzed by discriminant function analysis using SPSS-23. Results: Findings revealed significant differences between the 3 groups in non-acceptance, focusing, shifting, brooding, and decentering (P<0.01). Results of discriminant function analysis showed 2 functions: the first accounted for 87.4% of the variance (Wilk`s Lambda = 0.81, df = 10, P<0.01, χ2 = 70.06), and the second for 12.6% of the variance (Wilk`s Lambda = 0.97, df = 4, P<0.05, χ2 = 9.43) of between group variability. Non-acceptance and focusing discriminated GAD and SAD the most. Conclusion: The findings of the present study support both splitter and lumper approaches as there were some emotion regulation strategies common between GAD and SAD, including shifting, decentering, and brooding. However, some of them were distinct, such as focusing and non-acceptance. Nevertheless, there are still inconsistencies in research about the findings, and thus examining the pathways may illuminate these findings. Psychiatry & Psychology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2018-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6178328/ /pubmed/30319698 Text en Copyright © Psychiatry & Psychology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Abasi, Imaneh
Dolatshahi, Behrouz
Farazmand, Shirin
Pourshahbaz, Abbas
Tamanaeefar, Shima
Emotion Regulation in Generalized Anxiety and Social Anxiety: Examining the Distinct and Shared Use of Emotion Regulation Strategies
title Emotion Regulation in Generalized Anxiety and Social Anxiety: Examining the Distinct and Shared Use of Emotion Regulation Strategies
title_full Emotion Regulation in Generalized Anxiety and Social Anxiety: Examining the Distinct and Shared Use of Emotion Regulation Strategies
title_fullStr Emotion Regulation in Generalized Anxiety and Social Anxiety: Examining the Distinct and Shared Use of Emotion Regulation Strategies
title_full_unstemmed Emotion Regulation in Generalized Anxiety and Social Anxiety: Examining the Distinct and Shared Use of Emotion Regulation Strategies
title_short Emotion Regulation in Generalized Anxiety and Social Anxiety: Examining the Distinct and Shared Use of Emotion Regulation Strategies
title_sort emotion regulation in generalized anxiety and social anxiety: examining the distinct and shared use of emotion regulation strategies
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6178328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30319698
work_keys_str_mv AT abasiimaneh emotionregulationingeneralizedanxietyandsocialanxietyexaminingthedistinctandshareduseofemotionregulationstrategies
AT dolatshahibehrouz emotionregulationingeneralizedanxietyandsocialanxietyexaminingthedistinctandshareduseofemotionregulationstrategies
AT farazmandshirin emotionregulationingeneralizedanxietyandsocialanxietyexaminingthedistinctandshareduseofemotionregulationstrategies
AT pourshahbazabbas emotionregulationingeneralizedanxietyandsocialanxietyexaminingthedistinctandshareduseofemotionregulationstrategies
AT tamanaeefarshima emotionregulationingeneralizedanxietyandsocialanxietyexaminingthedistinctandshareduseofemotionregulationstrategies