Axial-Oblique Versus Standard Axial 3-T Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of Trochlear Cartilage Lesions: A Prospective Study

BACKGROUND: Imaging of the femoral trochlea has been inherently difficult because of its convex anatomy. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic utility of a standard axial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequence with an axial-oblique MRI sequence of the knee for the detection of trochlear articular cartilage lesions on a high-field 3-T MRI scanner. We hypothesized that axial-oblique MRI scans of the knee obtained along the true axis of the trochlea would significantly improve the detection of high-grade cartilage lesions. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: Patients who underwent MRI and subsequent surgery for any indication were prospectively enrolled into this study between June 2014 and February 2015. The articular cartilage of the trochlea was evaluated independently by 3 raters on axial and axial-oblique MRI and compared with arthroscopic findings (gold standard). The interrater and intrarater reliability of mild (International Cartilage Repair Society [ICRS] grades 1 or 2) and severe (ICRS grades 3 or 4) lesions on MRI were assessed as well as the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. RESULTS: A total of 99 knees in 96 patients were included in the study. Interrater and intrarater agreement for the identification of severe lesions were moderate to good on the proximal trochlea and fair to moderate on the distal trochlea. No significant differences in sensitivity were found between axial and axial-oblique scans for any grade of lesion (55% vs 51%, respectively; P = .700) or for severe lesions (61% vs 52%, respectively; P = .289). Similarly, specificity for detecting severe lesions was not significantly different between axial and axial-oblique scans (95% vs 87%, respectively; P = .219). Last, no significant differences in sensitivity or specificity were found between MRI sequences when separately evaluating proximal and distal trochlear lesions (all P > .05). CONCLUSION: The axial-oblique sequence was unable to improve the sensitivity of MRI in detecting articular cartilage lesions on the trochlea. Both conventional axial and axial-oblique sequences, reviewed independently of the complete MRI series, had low sensitivity in detecting trochlear articular cartilage lesions. For this reason, clinicians should utilize all MRI planes to evaluate the articular cartilage of the trochlea. Future studies should focus on improving MRI techniques for detecting and characterizing cartilage lesions of the trochlea.