Cargando…

Relationship between body mass, lean mass, fat mass, and limb bone cross‐sectional geometry: Implications for estimating body mass and physique from the skeleton

OBJECTIVES: Estimating body mass from skeletal dimensions is widely practiced, but methods for estimating its components (lean and fat mass) are poorly developed. The ability to estimate these characteristics would offer new insights into the evolution of body composition and its variation relative...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pomeroy, Emma, Macintosh, Alison, Wells, Jonathan C.K., Cole, Tim J., Stock, Jay T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6178563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29344931
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23398
_version_ 1783361964167135232
author Pomeroy, Emma
Macintosh, Alison
Wells, Jonathan C.K.
Cole, Tim J.
Stock, Jay T.
author_facet Pomeroy, Emma
Macintosh, Alison
Wells, Jonathan C.K.
Cole, Tim J.
Stock, Jay T.
author_sort Pomeroy, Emma
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Estimating body mass from skeletal dimensions is widely practiced, but methods for estimating its components (lean and fat mass) are poorly developed. The ability to estimate these characteristics would offer new insights into the evolution of body composition and its variation relative to past and present health. This study investigates the potential of long bone cross‐sectional properties as predictors of body, lean, and fat mass. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Humerus, femur and tibia midshaft cross‐sectional properties were measured by peripheral quantitative computed tomography in sample of young adult women (n = 105) characterized by a range of activity levels. Body composition was estimated from bioimpedance analysis. RESULTS: Lean mass correlated most strongly with both upper and lower limb bone properties (r values up to 0.74), while fat mass showed weak correlations (r ≤ 0.29). Estimation equations generated from tibial midshaft properties indicated that lean mass could be estimated relatively reliably, with some improvement using logged data and including bone length in the models (minimum standard error of estimate = 8.9%). Body mass prediction was less reliable and fat mass only poorly predicted (standard errors of estimate ≥11.9% and >33%, respectively). DISCUSSION: Lean mass can be predicted more reliably than body mass from limb bone cross‐sectional properties. The results highlight the potential for studying evolutionary trends in lean mass from skeletal remains, and have implications for understanding the relationship between bone morphology and body mass or composition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6178563
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61785632018-10-18 Relationship between body mass, lean mass, fat mass, and limb bone cross‐sectional geometry: Implications for estimating body mass and physique from the skeleton Pomeroy, Emma Macintosh, Alison Wells, Jonathan C.K. Cole, Tim J. Stock, Jay T. Am J Phys Anthropol Research Articles OBJECTIVES: Estimating body mass from skeletal dimensions is widely practiced, but methods for estimating its components (lean and fat mass) are poorly developed. The ability to estimate these characteristics would offer new insights into the evolution of body composition and its variation relative to past and present health. This study investigates the potential of long bone cross‐sectional properties as predictors of body, lean, and fat mass. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Humerus, femur and tibia midshaft cross‐sectional properties were measured by peripheral quantitative computed tomography in sample of young adult women (n = 105) characterized by a range of activity levels. Body composition was estimated from bioimpedance analysis. RESULTS: Lean mass correlated most strongly with both upper and lower limb bone properties (r values up to 0.74), while fat mass showed weak correlations (r ≤ 0.29). Estimation equations generated from tibial midshaft properties indicated that lean mass could be estimated relatively reliably, with some improvement using logged data and including bone length in the models (minimum standard error of estimate = 8.9%). Body mass prediction was less reliable and fat mass only poorly predicted (standard errors of estimate ≥11.9% and >33%, respectively). DISCUSSION: Lean mass can be predicted more reliably than body mass from limb bone cross‐sectional properties. The results highlight the potential for studying evolutionary trends in lean mass from skeletal remains, and have implications for understanding the relationship between bone morphology and body mass or composition. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-01-18 2018-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6178563/ /pubmed/29344931 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23398 Text en © 2018 The Authors. American Journal of Physical Anthropology Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Pomeroy, Emma
Macintosh, Alison
Wells, Jonathan C.K.
Cole, Tim J.
Stock, Jay T.
Relationship between body mass, lean mass, fat mass, and limb bone cross‐sectional geometry: Implications for estimating body mass and physique from the skeleton
title Relationship between body mass, lean mass, fat mass, and limb bone cross‐sectional geometry: Implications for estimating body mass and physique from the skeleton
title_full Relationship between body mass, lean mass, fat mass, and limb bone cross‐sectional geometry: Implications for estimating body mass and physique from the skeleton
title_fullStr Relationship between body mass, lean mass, fat mass, and limb bone cross‐sectional geometry: Implications for estimating body mass and physique from the skeleton
title_full_unstemmed Relationship between body mass, lean mass, fat mass, and limb bone cross‐sectional geometry: Implications for estimating body mass and physique from the skeleton
title_short Relationship between body mass, lean mass, fat mass, and limb bone cross‐sectional geometry: Implications for estimating body mass and physique from the skeleton
title_sort relationship between body mass, lean mass, fat mass, and limb bone cross‐sectional geometry: implications for estimating body mass and physique from the skeleton
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6178563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29344931
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23398
work_keys_str_mv AT pomeroyemma relationshipbetweenbodymassleanmassfatmassandlimbbonecrosssectionalgeometryimplicationsforestimatingbodymassandphysiquefromtheskeleton
AT macintoshalison relationshipbetweenbodymassleanmassfatmassandlimbbonecrosssectionalgeometryimplicationsforestimatingbodymassandphysiquefromtheskeleton
AT wellsjonathanck relationshipbetweenbodymassleanmassfatmassandlimbbonecrosssectionalgeometryimplicationsforestimatingbodymassandphysiquefromtheskeleton
AT coletimj relationshipbetweenbodymassleanmassfatmassandlimbbonecrosssectionalgeometryimplicationsforestimatingbodymassandphysiquefromtheskeleton
AT stockjayt relationshipbetweenbodymassleanmassfatmassandlimbbonecrosssectionalgeometryimplicationsforestimatingbodymassandphysiquefromtheskeleton