Cargando…

Evaluation of a semi‐automated von Willebrand factor multimer assay, the Hydragel 5 von Willebrand multimer, by two European Centers

BACKGROUND: The phenotypic diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a multistep process with classification dependent on the quantification of von Willebrand factor (VWF) multimeric structure. VWF multimer analysis is a technically challenging, lengthy and non‐standardised assay, usually perform...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bowyer, Annette E., Goodfellow, Karen J., Seidel, Holger, Westhofen, Philipp, Stufano, Francesca, Goodeve, Anne, Kitchen, Stephen, Makris, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6178608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30349898
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12141
_version_ 1783361971075153920
author Bowyer, Annette E.
Goodfellow, Karen J.
Seidel, Holger
Westhofen, Philipp
Stufano, Francesca
Goodeve, Anne
Kitchen, Stephen
Makris, Michael
author_facet Bowyer, Annette E.
Goodfellow, Karen J.
Seidel, Holger
Westhofen, Philipp
Stufano, Francesca
Goodeve, Anne
Kitchen, Stephen
Makris, Michael
author_sort Bowyer, Annette E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The phenotypic diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a multistep process with classification dependent on the quantification of von Willebrand factor (VWF) multimeric structure. VWF multimer analysis is a technically challenging, lengthy and non‐standardised assay, usually performed in specialist laboratories. Recently, a new semi‐automated multimer assay, the Hydragel 5 von Willebrand multimers (H5VWM) has become available. OBJECTIVES: This study, performed in two European centres, compared existing in‐house multimer assays to the H5VWM in individuals with and without VWD. RESULTS: Overall agreement of 91.1% was observed in 74 individuals with normal VWF levels, 57 patients grouped as type 1 VWD, 33 type 2A, 16 type 2B, 28 type 2M, 11 type 2N. Patients tested following Desmopressin or VWF concentrate, with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and acquired von Willebrand syndrome were also evaluated. Many of the discrepancies between methods were in patients with genetic mutations linked to more than one type of VWD including p.R1374C/H and p.R1315C. Quantifiable multimer results were available within one working day. Densitometry improved the interpretation of the multimers with slight structural variations that were not apparent by visual inspection of the in‐house method. CONCLUSIONS: 5VWM was a rapid, sensitive, standardised assay which used existing technology and could be included as an initial screen of VWF multimers in a VWD diagnostic algorithm in conjunction with traditional multimer analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6178608
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61786082018-10-22 Evaluation of a semi‐automated von Willebrand factor multimer assay, the Hydragel 5 von Willebrand multimer, by two European Centers Bowyer, Annette E. Goodfellow, Karen J. Seidel, Holger Westhofen, Philipp Stufano, Francesca Goodeve, Anne Kitchen, Stephen Makris, Michael Res Pract Thromb Haemost Original Articles: Haemostasis BACKGROUND: The phenotypic diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a multistep process with classification dependent on the quantification of von Willebrand factor (VWF) multimeric structure. VWF multimer analysis is a technically challenging, lengthy and non‐standardised assay, usually performed in specialist laboratories. Recently, a new semi‐automated multimer assay, the Hydragel 5 von Willebrand multimers (H5VWM) has become available. OBJECTIVES: This study, performed in two European centres, compared existing in‐house multimer assays to the H5VWM in individuals with and without VWD. RESULTS: Overall agreement of 91.1% was observed in 74 individuals with normal VWF levels, 57 patients grouped as type 1 VWD, 33 type 2A, 16 type 2B, 28 type 2M, 11 type 2N. Patients tested following Desmopressin or VWF concentrate, with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and acquired von Willebrand syndrome were also evaluated. Many of the discrepancies between methods were in patients with genetic mutations linked to more than one type of VWD including p.R1374C/H and p.R1315C. Quantifiable multimer results were available within one working day. Densitometry improved the interpretation of the multimers with slight structural variations that were not apparent by visual inspection of the in‐house method. CONCLUSIONS: 5VWM was a rapid, sensitive, standardised assay which used existing technology and could be included as an initial screen of VWF multimers in a VWD diagnostic algorithm in conjunction with traditional multimer analysis. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6178608/ /pubmed/30349898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12141 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc on behalf of International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles: Haemostasis
Bowyer, Annette E.
Goodfellow, Karen J.
Seidel, Holger
Westhofen, Philipp
Stufano, Francesca
Goodeve, Anne
Kitchen, Stephen
Makris, Michael
Evaluation of a semi‐automated von Willebrand factor multimer assay, the Hydragel 5 von Willebrand multimer, by two European Centers
title Evaluation of a semi‐automated von Willebrand factor multimer assay, the Hydragel 5 von Willebrand multimer, by two European Centers
title_full Evaluation of a semi‐automated von Willebrand factor multimer assay, the Hydragel 5 von Willebrand multimer, by two European Centers
title_fullStr Evaluation of a semi‐automated von Willebrand factor multimer assay, the Hydragel 5 von Willebrand multimer, by two European Centers
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a semi‐automated von Willebrand factor multimer assay, the Hydragel 5 von Willebrand multimer, by two European Centers
title_short Evaluation of a semi‐automated von Willebrand factor multimer assay, the Hydragel 5 von Willebrand multimer, by two European Centers
title_sort evaluation of a semi‐automated von willebrand factor multimer assay, the hydragel 5 von willebrand multimer, by two european centers
topic Original Articles: Haemostasis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6178608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30349898
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12141
work_keys_str_mv AT bowyerannettee evaluationofasemiautomatedvonwillebrandfactormultimerassaythehydragel5vonwillebrandmultimerbytwoeuropeancenters
AT goodfellowkarenj evaluationofasemiautomatedvonwillebrandfactormultimerassaythehydragel5vonwillebrandmultimerbytwoeuropeancenters
AT seidelholger evaluationofasemiautomatedvonwillebrandfactormultimerassaythehydragel5vonwillebrandmultimerbytwoeuropeancenters
AT westhofenphilipp evaluationofasemiautomatedvonwillebrandfactormultimerassaythehydragel5vonwillebrandmultimerbytwoeuropeancenters
AT stufanofrancesca evaluationofasemiautomatedvonwillebrandfactormultimerassaythehydragel5vonwillebrandmultimerbytwoeuropeancenters
AT goodeveanne evaluationofasemiautomatedvonwillebrandfactormultimerassaythehydragel5vonwillebrandmultimerbytwoeuropeancenters
AT kitchenstephen evaluationofasemiautomatedvonwillebrandfactormultimerassaythehydragel5vonwillebrandmultimerbytwoeuropeancenters
AT makrismichael evaluationofasemiautomatedvonwillebrandfactormultimerassaythehydragel5vonwillebrandmultimerbytwoeuropeancenters