Cargando…

Bone scan in painful knee arthroplasty: obsolete or actual examination?

Background: Complications and revision surgeries after Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) have increased. Aseptic loosening, instability and infection are the major causes of TKA failure. For many years, nuclear medicine (NM) imaging was helpful to frame a painful total joint arthroplasty. The differenti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Niccoli, Giuseppe, Mercurio, Domenico, Cortese, Fabrizio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mattioli 1885 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6179002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28657567
http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v88i2-S.6516
_version_ 1783362021856641024
author Niccoli, Giuseppe
Mercurio, Domenico
Cortese, Fabrizio
author_facet Niccoli, Giuseppe
Mercurio, Domenico
Cortese, Fabrizio
author_sort Niccoli, Giuseppe
collection PubMed
description Background: Complications and revision surgeries after Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) have increased. Aseptic loosening, instability and infection are the major causes of TKA failure. For many years, nuclear medicine (NM) imaging was helpful to frame a painful total joint arthroplasty. The differentiation of septic from aseptic prosthetic loosening is critical. The latest AAOS guidelines to detect periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) restrict the role of NM scintigraphy. On the other hand, several studies suggest that NM imaging plays an important role in the evaluation of patients with painful prosthesis, but its specificity in differentiating aseptic loosening from infection is low. Moreover, scintigraphic exams showed different diagnostic accuracy in TKA compared to total hip arthroplasty (THA). Purpose: To assess and discuss current knowledges about the diagnostic value of the various scans in TKA failure alone. Methods: We perform a pubmed/medline search to identify all papers published in the literature matching the following key words: “total knee arthroplasty”, “bone”, “scintigraphy”, “imaging”, “three-phase”, “triple-phase”, “99mTc-HDP”, “99mTc-MDP”, “99mTc-hydroxymethane diphosphonate”, and “99m Tc-methylenediphosphonate”, “leukocyte scanning”, “labeled leukocyte scintigraphy”, “antigranulocyte”, “nuclear medicine”, “septic loosening”, “aseptic loosening” and “infection”. Results: Three phases bone scintigraphy results an early diagnostic screening test or part of the preoperative tests for painful TKA and when PJI is suspected. Instead, leukocyte/bone marrow scintigraphy is superior to other scintigraphic tools in diagnosis of TKA infections. Granulocyte scintigraphy, seems to be an excellent choice when the diagnosis is unclear. Moreover, nuclear diagnostic tests showed different diagnostic accuracy between TKA and THA. Conclusions: Although nuclear diagnostic tests for THA failure are superior in diagnostic accuracy compared to TKA, NM scintigraphy is still an effective tool in the identification of chronic, low grade PJI. To date, scintigraphic exams have an higher levels of sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. Currently, leukocyte/bone marrow scintigraphy is considered the gold standard for this aim. Nevertheless, further studies are needed to assess and improve the accuracy of the scintigraphic exams in order to discriminate the causes of failure for painful TKA. (www.actabiomedica.it)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6179002
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Mattioli 1885
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61790022019-05-08 Bone scan in painful knee arthroplasty: obsolete or actual examination? Niccoli, Giuseppe Mercurio, Domenico Cortese, Fabrizio Acta Biomed Original Article Background: Complications and revision surgeries after Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) have increased. Aseptic loosening, instability and infection are the major causes of TKA failure. For many years, nuclear medicine (NM) imaging was helpful to frame a painful total joint arthroplasty. The differentiation of septic from aseptic prosthetic loosening is critical. The latest AAOS guidelines to detect periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) restrict the role of NM scintigraphy. On the other hand, several studies suggest that NM imaging plays an important role in the evaluation of patients with painful prosthesis, but its specificity in differentiating aseptic loosening from infection is low. Moreover, scintigraphic exams showed different diagnostic accuracy in TKA compared to total hip arthroplasty (THA). Purpose: To assess and discuss current knowledges about the diagnostic value of the various scans in TKA failure alone. Methods: We perform a pubmed/medline search to identify all papers published in the literature matching the following key words: “total knee arthroplasty”, “bone”, “scintigraphy”, “imaging”, “three-phase”, “triple-phase”, “99mTc-HDP”, “99mTc-MDP”, “99mTc-hydroxymethane diphosphonate”, and “99m Tc-methylenediphosphonate”, “leukocyte scanning”, “labeled leukocyte scintigraphy”, “antigranulocyte”, “nuclear medicine”, “septic loosening”, “aseptic loosening” and “infection”. Results: Three phases bone scintigraphy results an early diagnostic screening test or part of the preoperative tests for painful TKA and when PJI is suspected. Instead, leukocyte/bone marrow scintigraphy is superior to other scintigraphic tools in diagnosis of TKA infections. Granulocyte scintigraphy, seems to be an excellent choice when the diagnosis is unclear. Moreover, nuclear diagnostic tests showed different diagnostic accuracy between TKA and THA. Conclusions: Although nuclear diagnostic tests for THA failure are superior in diagnostic accuracy compared to TKA, NM scintigraphy is still an effective tool in the identification of chronic, low grade PJI. To date, scintigraphic exams have an higher levels of sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. Currently, leukocyte/bone marrow scintigraphy is considered the gold standard for this aim. Nevertheless, further studies are needed to assess and improve the accuracy of the scintigraphic exams in order to discriminate the causes of failure for painful TKA. (www.actabiomedica.it) Mattioli 1885 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC6179002/ /pubmed/28657567 http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v88i2-S.6516 Text en Copyright: © 2017 ACTA BIO MEDICA SOCIETY OF MEDICINE AND NATURAL SCIENCES OF PARMA http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Original Article
Niccoli, Giuseppe
Mercurio, Domenico
Cortese, Fabrizio
Bone scan in painful knee arthroplasty: obsolete or actual examination?
title Bone scan in painful knee arthroplasty: obsolete or actual examination?
title_full Bone scan in painful knee arthroplasty: obsolete or actual examination?
title_fullStr Bone scan in painful knee arthroplasty: obsolete or actual examination?
title_full_unstemmed Bone scan in painful knee arthroplasty: obsolete or actual examination?
title_short Bone scan in painful knee arthroplasty: obsolete or actual examination?
title_sort bone scan in painful knee arthroplasty: obsolete or actual examination?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6179002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28657567
http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v88i2-S.6516
work_keys_str_mv AT niccoligiuseppe bonescaninpainfulkneearthroplastyobsoleteoractualexamination
AT mercuriodomenico bonescaninpainfulkneearthroplastyobsoleteoractualexamination
AT cortesefabrizio bonescaninpainfulkneearthroplastyobsoleteoractualexamination