Cargando…
Evaluation of prospective motion correction of high-resolution 3D-T2-FLAIR acquisitions in epilepsy patients()
T2-FLAIR is the single most sensitive MRI contrast to detect lesions underlying focal epilepsies but 3D sequences used to obtain isotropic high-resolution images are susceptible to motion artefacts. Prospective motion correction (PMC) – demonstrated to improve 3D-T1 image quality in a pediatric popu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Masson
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6180279/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29505841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neurad.2018.02.007 |
_version_ | 1783362169409110016 |
---|---|
author | Vos, Sjoerd B. Micallef, Caroline Barkhof, Frederik Hill, Andrea Winston, Gavin P. Ourselin, Sebastien Duncan, John S. |
author_facet | Vos, Sjoerd B. Micallef, Caroline Barkhof, Frederik Hill, Andrea Winston, Gavin P. Ourselin, Sebastien Duncan, John S. |
author_sort | Vos, Sjoerd B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | T2-FLAIR is the single most sensitive MRI contrast to detect lesions underlying focal epilepsies but 3D sequences used to obtain isotropic high-resolution images are susceptible to motion artefacts. Prospective motion correction (PMC) – demonstrated to improve 3D-T1 image quality in a pediatric population – was applied to high-resolution 3D-T2-FLAIR scans in adult epilepsy patients to evaluate its clinical benefit. Coronal 3D-T2-FLAIR scans were acquired with a 1 mm isotropic resolution on a 3 T MRI scanner. Two expert neuroradiologists reviewed 40 scans without PMC and 40 with navigator-based PMC. Visual assessment addressed six criteria of image quality (resolution, SNR, WM-GM contrast, intensity homogeneity, lesion conspicuity, diagnostic confidence) on a seven-point Likert scale (from non-diagnostic to outstanding). SNR was also objectively quantified within the white matter. PMC scans had near-identical scores on the criteria of image quality to non-PMC scans, with the notable exception that intensity homogeneity was generally worse. Using PMC, the percentage of scans with bad image quality was substantially lower than without PMC (3.25% vs. 12.5%) on the other five criteria. Quantitative SNR estimates revealed that PMC and non-PMC had no significant difference in SNR (P = 0.07). Application of prospective motion correction to 3D-T2-FLAIR sequences decreased the percentage of low-quality scans, reducing the number of scans that need to be repeated to obtain clinically useful data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6180279 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Masson |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61802792018-10-12 Evaluation of prospective motion correction of high-resolution 3D-T2-FLAIR acquisitions in epilepsy patients() Vos, Sjoerd B. Micallef, Caroline Barkhof, Frederik Hill, Andrea Winston, Gavin P. Ourselin, Sebastien Duncan, John S. J Neuroradiol Article T2-FLAIR is the single most sensitive MRI contrast to detect lesions underlying focal epilepsies but 3D sequences used to obtain isotropic high-resolution images are susceptible to motion artefacts. Prospective motion correction (PMC) – demonstrated to improve 3D-T1 image quality in a pediatric population – was applied to high-resolution 3D-T2-FLAIR scans in adult epilepsy patients to evaluate its clinical benefit. Coronal 3D-T2-FLAIR scans were acquired with a 1 mm isotropic resolution on a 3 T MRI scanner. Two expert neuroradiologists reviewed 40 scans without PMC and 40 with navigator-based PMC. Visual assessment addressed six criteria of image quality (resolution, SNR, WM-GM contrast, intensity homogeneity, lesion conspicuity, diagnostic confidence) on a seven-point Likert scale (from non-diagnostic to outstanding). SNR was also objectively quantified within the white matter. PMC scans had near-identical scores on the criteria of image quality to non-PMC scans, with the notable exception that intensity homogeneity was generally worse. Using PMC, the percentage of scans with bad image quality was substantially lower than without PMC (3.25% vs. 12.5%) on the other five criteria. Quantitative SNR estimates revealed that PMC and non-PMC had no significant difference in SNR (P = 0.07). Application of prospective motion correction to 3D-T2-FLAIR sequences decreased the percentage of low-quality scans, reducing the number of scans that need to be repeated to obtain clinically useful data. Masson 2018-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6180279/ /pubmed/29505841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neurad.2018.02.007 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Vos, Sjoerd B. Micallef, Caroline Barkhof, Frederik Hill, Andrea Winston, Gavin P. Ourselin, Sebastien Duncan, John S. Evaluation of prospective motion correction of high-resolution 3D-T2-FLAIR acquisitions in epilepsy patients() |
title | Evaluation of prospective motion correction of high-resolution 3D-T2-FLAIR acquisitions in epilepsy patients() |
title_full | Evaluation of prospective motion correction of high-resolution 3D-T2-FLAIR acquisitions in epilepsy patients() |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of prospective motion correction of high-resolution 3D-T2-FLAIR acquisitions in epilepsy patients() |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of prospective motion correction of high-resolution 3D-T2-FLAIR acquisitions in epilepsy patients() |
title_short | Evaluation of prospective motion correction of high-resolution 3D-T2-FLAIR acquisitions in epilepsy patients() |
title_sort | evaluation of prospective motion correction of high-resolution 3d-t2-flair acquisitions in epilepsy patients() |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6180279/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29505841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neurad.2018.02.007 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vossjoerdb evaluationofprospectivemotioncorrectionofhighresolution3dt2flairacquisitionsinepilepsypatients AT micallefcaroline evaluationofprospectivemotioncorrectionofhighresolution3dt2flairacquisitionsinepilepsypatients AT barkhoffrederik evaluationofprospectivemotioncorrectionofhighresolution3dt2flairacquisitionsinepilepsypatients AT hillandrea evaluationofprospectivemotioncorrectionofhighresolution3dt2flairacquisitionsinepilepsypatients AT winstongavinp evaluationofprospectivemotioncorrectionofhighresolution3dt2flairacquisitionsinepilepsypatients AT ourselinsebastien evaluationofprospectivemotioncorrectionofhighresolution3dt2flairacquisitionsinepilepsypatients AT duncanjohns evaluationofprospectivemotioncorrectionofhighresolution3dt2flairacquisitionsinepilepsypatients |