Cargando…

Effects of evolutionary history on genome wide and phenotypic convergence in Drosophila populations

BACKGROUND: Studies combining experimental evolution and next-generation sequencing have found that adaptation in sexually reproducing populations is primarily fueled by standing genetic variation. Consequently, the response to selection is rapid and highly repeatable across replicate populations. S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Phillips, Mark A, Rutledge, Grant A, Kezos, James N, Greenspan, Zachary S, Talbott, Andrew, Matty, Sara, Arain, Hamid, Mueller, Laurence D, Rose, Michael R, Shahrestani, Parvin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6180417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30305018
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-5118-7
_version_ 1783362193503289344
author Phillips, Mark A
Rutledge, Grant A
Kezos, James N
Greenspan, Zachary S
Talbott, Andrew
Matty, Sara
Arain, Hamid
Mueller, Laurence D
Rose, Michael R
Shahrestani, Parvin
author_facet Phillips, Mark A
Rutledge, Grant A
Kezos, James N
Greenspan, Zachary S
Talbott, Andrew
Matty, Sara
Arain, Hamid
Mueller, Laurence D
Rose, Michael R
Shahrestani, Parvin
author_sort Phillips, Mark A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Studies combining experimental evolution and next-generation sequencing have found that adaptation in sexually reproducing populations is primarily fueled by standing genetic variation. Consequently, the response to selection is rapid and highly repeatable across replicate populations. Some studies suggest that the response to selection is highly repeatable at both the phenotypic and genomic levels, and that evolutionary history has little impact. Other studies suggest that even when the response to selection is repeatable phenotypically, evolutionary history can have significant impacts at the genomic level. Here we test two hypotheses that may explain this discrepancy. Hypothesis 1: Past intense selection reduces evolutionary repeatability at the genomic and phenotypic levels when conditions change. Hypothesis 2: Previous intense selection does not reduce evolutionary repeatability, but other evolutionary mechanisms may. We test these hypotheses using D. melanogaster populations that were subjected to 260 generations of intense selection for desiccation resistance and have since been under relaxed selection for the past 230 generations. RESULTS: We find that, with the exception of longevity and to a lesser extent fecundity, 230 generations of relaxed selection has erased the extreme phenotypic differentiation previously found. We also find no signs of genetic fixation, and only limited evidence of genetic differentiation between previously desiccation resistance selected populations and their controls. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that evolution in our system is highly repeatable even when populations have been previously subjected to bouts of extreme selection. We therefore conclude that evolutionary repeatability can overcome past bouts of extreme selection in Drosophila experimental evolution, provided experiments are sufficiently long and populations are not inbred. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12864-018-5118-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6180417
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61804172018-10-18 Effects of evolutionary history on genome wide and phenotypic convergence in Drosophila populations Phillips, Mark A Rutledge, Grant A Kezos, James N Greenspan, Zachary S Talbott, Andrew Matty, Sara Arain, Hamid Mueller, Laurence D Rose, Michael R Shahrestani, Parvin BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: Studies combining experimental evolution and next-generation sequencing have found that adaptation in sexually reproducing populations is primarily fueled by standing genetic variation. Consequently, the response to selection is rapid and highly repeatable across replicate populations. Some studies suggest that the response to selection is highly repeatable at both the phenotypic and genomic levels, and that evolutionary history has little impact. Other studies suggest that even when the response to selection is repeatable phenotypically, evolutionary history can have significant impacts at the genomic level. Here we test two hypotheses that may explain this discrepancy. Hypothesis 1: Past intense selection reduces evolutionary repeatability at the genomic and phenotypic levels when conditions change. Hypothesis 2: Previous intense selection does not reduce evolutionary repeatability, but other evolutionary mechanisms may. We test these hypotheses using D. melanogaster populations that were subjected to 260 generations of intense selection for desiccation resistance and have since been under relaxed selection for the past 230 generations. RESULTS: We find that, with the exception of longevity and to a lesser extent fecundity, 230 generations of relaxed selection has erased the extreme phenotypic differentiation previously found. We also find no signs of genetic fixation, and only limited evidence of genetic differentiation between previously desiccation resistance selected populations and their controls. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that evolution in our system is highly repeatable even when populations have been previously subjected to bouts of extreme selection. We therefore conclude that evolutionary repeatability can overcome past bouts of extreme selection in Drosophila experimental evolution, provided experiments are sufficiently long and populations are not inbred. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12864-018-5118-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6180417/ /pubmed/30305018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-5118-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Phillips, Mark A
Rutledge, Grant A
Kezos, James N
Greenspan, Zachary S
Talbott, Andrew
Matty, Sara
Arain, Hamid
Mueller, Laurence D
Rose, Michael R
Shahrestani, Parvin
Effects of evolutionary history on genome wide and phenotypic convergence in Drosophila populations
title Effects of evolutionary history on genome wide and phenotypic convergence in Drosophila populations
title_full Effects of evolutionary history on genome wide and phenotypic convergence in Drosophila populations
title_fullStr Effects of evolutionary history on genome wide and phenotypic convergence in Drosophila populations
title_full_unstemmed Effects of evolutionary history on genome wide and phenotypic convergence in Drosophila populations
title_short Effects of evolutionary history on genome wide and phenotypic convergence in Drosophila populations
title_sort effects of evolutionary history on genome wide and phenotypic convergence in drosophila populations
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6180417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30305018
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-5118-7
work_keys_str_mv AT phillipsmarka effectsofevolutionaryhistoryongenomewideandphenotypicconvergenceindrosophilapopulations
AT rutledgegranta effectsofevolutionaryhistoryongenomewideandphenotypicconvergenceindrosophilapopulations
AT kezosjamesn effectsofevolutionaryhistoryongenomewideandphenotypicconvergenceindrosophilapopulations
AT greenspanzacharys effectsofevolutionaryhistoryongenomewideandphenotypicconvergenceindrosophilapopulations
AT talbottandrew effectsofevolutionaryhistoryongenomewideandphenotypicconvergenceindrosophilapopulations
AT mattysara effectsofevolutionaryhistoryongenomewideandphenotypicconvergenceindrosophilapopulations
AT arainhamid effectsofevolutionaryhistoryongenomewideandphenotypicconvergenceindrosophilapopulations
AT muellerlaurenced effectsofevolutionaryhistoryongenomewideandphenotypicconvergenceindrosophilapopulations
AT rosemichaelr effectsofevolutionaryhistoryongenomewideandphenotypicconvergenceindrosophilapopulations
AT shahrestaniparvin effectsofevolutionaryhistoryongenomewideandphenotypicconvergenceindrosophilapopulations