Cargando…
Effects of evolutionary history on genome wide and phenotypic convergence in Drosophila populations
BACKGROUND: Studies combining experimental evolution and next-generation sequencing have found that adaptation in sexually reproducing populations is primarily fueled by standing genetic variation. Consequently, the response to selection is rapid and highly repeatable across replicate populations. S...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6180417/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30305018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-5118-7 |
_version_ | 1783362193503289344 |
---|---|
author | Phillips, Mark A Rutledge, Grant A Kezos, James N Greenspan, Zachary S Talbott, Andrew Matty, Sara Arain, Hamid Mueller, Laurence D Rose, Michael R Shahrestani, Parvin |
author_facet | Phillips, Mark A Rutledge, Grant A Kezos, James N Greenspan, Zachary S Talbott, Andrew Matty, Sara Arain, Hamid Mueller, Laurence D Rose, Michael R Shahrestani, Parvin |
author_sort | Phillips, Mark A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Studies combining experimental evolution and next-generation sequencing have found that adaptation in sexually reproducing populations is primarily fueled by standing genetic variation. Consequently, the response to selection is rapid and highly repeatable across replicate populations. Some studies suggest that the response to selection is highly repeatable at both the phenotypic and genomic levels, and that evolutionary history has little impact. Other studies suggest that even when the response to selection is repeatable phenotypically, evolutionary history can have significant impacts at the genomic level. Here we test two hypotheses that may explain this discrepancy. Hypothesis 1: Past intense selection reduces evolutionary repeatability at the genomic and phenotypic levels when conditions change. Hypothesis 2: Previous intense selection does not reduce evolutionary repeatability, but other evolutionary mechanisms may. We test these hypotheses using D. melanogaster populations that were subjected to 260 generations of intense selection for desiccation resistance and have since been under relaxed selection for the past 230 generations. RESULTS: We find that, with the exception of longevity and to a lesser extent fecundity, 230 generations of relaxed selection has erased the extreme phenotypic differentiation previously found. We also find no signs of genetic fixation, and only limited evidence of genetic differentiation between previously desiccation resistance selected populations and their controls. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that evolution in our system is highly repeatable even when populations have been previously subjected to bouts of extreme selection. We therefore conclude that evolutionary repeatability can overcome past bouts of extreme selection in Drosophila experimental evolution, provided experiments are sufficiently long and populations are not inbred. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12864-018-5118-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6180417 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61804172018-10-18 Effects of evolutionary history on genome wide and phenotypic convergence in Drosophila populations Phillips, Mark A Rutledge, Grant A Kezos, James N Greenspan, Zachary S Talbott, Andrew Matty, Sara Arain, Hamid Mueller, Laurence D Rose, Michael R Shahrestani, Parvin BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: Studies combining experimental evolution and next-generation sequencing have found that adaptation in sexually reproducing populations is primarily fueled by standing genetic variation. Consequently, the response to selection is rapid and highly repeatable across replicate populations. Some studies suggest that the response to selection is highly repeatable at both the phenotypic and genomic levels, and that evolutionary history has little impact. Other studies suggest that even when the response to selection is repeatable phenotypically, evolutionary history can have significant impacts at the genomic level. Here we test two hypotheses that may explain this discrepancy. Hypothesis 1: Past intense selection reduces evolutionary repeatability at the genomic and phenotypic levels when conditions change. Hypothesis 2: Previous intense selection does not reduce evolutionary repeatability, but other evolutionary mechanisms may. We test these hypotheses using D. melanogaster populations that were subjected to 260 generations of intense selection for desiccation resistance and have since been under relaxed selection for the past 230 generations. RESULTS: We find that, with the exception of longevity and to a lesser extent fecundity, 230 generations of relaxed selection has erased the extreme phenotypic differentiation previously found. We also find no signs of genetic fixation, and only limited evidence of genetic differentiation between previously desiccation resistance selected populations and their controls. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that evolution in our system is highly repeatable even when populations have been previously subjected to bouts of extreme selection. We therefore conclude that evolutionary repeatability can overcome past bouts of extreme selection in Drosophila experimental evolution, provided experiments are sufficiently long and populations are not inbred. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12864-018-5118-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6180417/ /pubmed/30305018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-5118-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Phillips, Mark A Rutledge, Grant A Kezos, James N Greenspan, Zachary S Talbott, Andrew Matty, Sara Arain, Hamid Mueller, Laurence D Rose, Michael R Shahrestani, Parvin Effects of evolutionary history on genome wide and phenotypic convergence in Drosophila populations |
title | Effects of evolutionary history on genome wide and phenotypic convergence in Drosophila populations |
title_full | Effects of evolutionary history on genome wide and phenotypic convergence in Drosophila populations |
title_fullStr | Effects of evolutionary history on genome wide and phenotypic convergence in Drosophila populations |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of evolutionary history on genome wide and phenotypic convergence in Drosophila populations |
title_short | Effects of evolutionary history on genome wide and phenotypic convergence in Drosophila populations |
title_sort | effects of evolutionary history on genome wide and phenotypic convergence in drosophila populations |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6180417/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30305018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-5118-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT phillipsmarka effectsofevolutionaryhistoryongenomewideandphenotypicconvergenceindrosophilapopulations AT rutledgegranta effectsofevolutionaryhistoryongenomewideandphenotypicconvergenceindrosophilapopulations AT kezosjamesn effectsofevolutionaryhistoryongenomewideandphenotypicconvergenceindrosophilapopulations AT greenspanzacharys effectsofevolutionaryhistoryongenomewideandphenotypicconvergenceindrosophilapopulations AT talbottandrew effectsofevolutionaryhistoryongenomewideandphenotypicconvergenceindrosophilapopulations AT mattysara effectsofevolutionaryhistoryongenomewideandphenotypicconvergenceindrosophilapopulations AT arainhamid effectsofevolutionaryhistoryongenomewideandphenotypicconvergenceindrosophilapopulations AT muellerlaurenced effectsofevolutionaryhistoryongenomewideandphenotypicconvergenceindrosophilapopulations AT rosemichaelr effectsofevolutionaryhistoryongenomewideandphenotypicconvergenceindrosophilapopulations AT shahrestaniparvin effectsofevolutionaryhistoryongenomewideandphenotypicconvergenceindrosophilapopulations |