Cargando…

Evaluation of methods to detect in vitro biofilm formation by staphylococcal clinical isolates

OBJECTIVE: Staphylococcus genus comprising both Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase negative staphylococci (CoNS) are widely distributed in nature and can infect diversity of hosts. Indeed, staphylococci are the major pathogens causing biofilm associated infections caused by contaminated hospital in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Manandhar, Sarita, Singh, Anjana, Varma, Ajit, Pandey, Shanti, Shrivastava, Neeraj
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6180658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30305150
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3820-9
_version_ 1783362252308480000
author Manandhar, Sarita
Singh, Anjana
Varma, Ajit
Pandey, Shanti
Shrivastava, Neeraj
author_facet Manandhar, Sarita
Singh, Anjana
Varma, Ajit
Pandey, Shanti
Shrivastava, Neeraj
author_sort Manandhar, Sarita
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Staphylococcus genus comprising both Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase negative staphylococci (CoNS) are widely distributed in nature and can infect diversity of hosts. Indeed, staphylococci are the major pathogens causing biofilm associated infections caused by contaminated hospital indwelling devices. These infections are persistent in nature being highly refractory to various stresses including antibiotics. Implementation of efficient diagnostic techniques for the biofilm production would help minimize the disease burden. Thus, early detection of pathogenic strains producing biofilms warrant the utmost importance in diagnostic laboratories especially in resource limited settings. RESULT: Among 375 isolates collected from different clinical specimens, 214 (57%) were identified as coagulase negative staphylococci and 161 (43%) S. aureus. Detection of In-vitro biofilm formation in these isolates were carried out by three commonly used phenotypic assays and a genotypic assay. While evaluating the results, tissue-culture method with supplemented glucose and sucrose showed the best correlation with the results of genotypic assay. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13104-018-3820-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6180658
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61806582018-10-18 Evaluation of methods to detect in vitro biofilm formation by staphylococcal clinical isolates Manandhar, Sarita Singh, Anjana Varma, Ajit Pandey, Shanti Shrivastava, Neeraj BMC Res Notes Research Note OBJECTIVE: Staphylococcus genus comprising both Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase negative staphylococci (CoNS) are widely distributed in nature and can infect diversity of hosts. Indeed, staphylococci are the major pathogens causing biofilm associated infections caused by contaminated hospital indwelling devices. These infections are persistent in nature being highly refractory to various stresses including antibiotics. Implementation of efficient diagnostic techniques for the biofilm production would help minimize the disease burden. Thus, early detection of pathogenic strains producing biofilms warrant the utmost importance in diagnostic laboratories especially in resource limited settings. RESULT: Among 375 isolates collected from different clinical specimens, 214 (57%) were identified as coagulase negative staphylococci and 161 (43%) S. aureus. Detection of In-vitro biofilm formation in these isolates were carried out by three commonly used phenotypic assays and a genotypic assay. While evaluating the results, tissue-culture method with supplemented glucose and sucrose showed the best correlation with the results of genotypic assay. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13104-018-3820-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6180658/ /pubmed/30305150 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3820-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Note
Manandhar, Sarita
Singh, Anjana
Varma, Ajit
Pandey, Shanti
Shrivastava, Neeraj
Evaluation of methods to detect in vitro biofilm formation by staphylococcal clinical isolates
title Evaluation of methods to detect in vitro biofilm formation by staphylococcal clinical isolates
title_full Evaluation of methods to detect in vitro biofilm formation by staphylococcal clinical isolates
title_fullStr Evaluation of methods to detect in vitro biofilm formation by staphylococcal clinical isolates
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of methods to detect in vitro biofilm formation by staphylococcal clinical isolates
title_short Evaluation of methods to detect in vitro biofilm formation by staphylococcal clinical isolates
title_sort evaluation of methods to detect in vitro biofilm formation by staphylococcal clinical isolates
topic Research Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6180658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30305150
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3820-9
work_keys_str_mv AT manandharsarita evaluationofmethodstodetectinvitrobiofilmformationbystaphylococcalclinicalisolates
AT singhanjana evaluationofmethodstodetectinvitrobiofilmformationbystaphylococcalclinicalisolates
AT varmaajit evaluationofmethodstodetectinvitrobiofilmformationbystaphylococcalclinicalisolates
AT pandeyshanti evaluationofmethodstodetectinvitrobiofilmformationbystaphylococcalclinicalisolates
AT shrivastavaneeraj evaluationofmethodstodetectinvitrobiofilmformationbystaphylococcalclinicalisolates