Cargando…
Evaluation of methods to detect in vitro biofilm formation by staphylococcal clinical isolates
OBJECTIVE: Staphylococcus genus comprising both Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase negative staphylococci (CoNS) are widely distributed in nature and can infect diversity of hosts. Indeed, staphylococci are the major pathogens causing biofilm associated infections caused by contaminated hospital in...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6180658/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30305150 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3820-9 |
_version_ | 1783362252308480000 |
---|---|
author | Manandhar, Sarita Singh, Anjana Varma, Ajit Pandey, Shanti Shrivastava, Neeraj |
author_facet | Manandhar, Sarita Singh, Anjana Varma, Ajit Pandey, Shanti Shrivastava, Neeraj |
author_sort | Manandhar, Sarita |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Staphylococcus genus comprising both Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase negative staphylococci (CoNS) are widely distributed in nature and can infect diversity of hosts. Indeed, staphylococci are the major pathogens causing biofilm associated infections caused by contaminated hospital indwelling devices. These infections are persistent in nature being highly refractory to various stresses including antibiotics. Implementation of efficient diagnostic techniques for the biofilm production would help minimize the disease burden. Thus, early detection of pathogenic strains producing biofilms warrant the utmost importance in diagnostic laboratories especially in resource limited settings. RESULT: Among 375 isolates collected from different clinical specimens, 214 (57%) were identified as coagulase negative staphylococci and 161 (43%) S. aureus. Detection of In-vitro biofilm formation in these isolates were carried out by three commonly used phenotypic assays and a genotypic assay. While evaluating the results, tissue-culture method with supplemented glucose and sucrose showed the best correlation with the results of genotypic assay. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13104-018-3820-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6180658 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61806582018-10-18 Evaluation of methods to detect in vitro biofilm formation by staphylococcal clinical isolates Manandhar, Sarita Singh, Anjana Varma, Ajit Pandey, Shanti Shrivastava, Neeraj BMC Res Notes Research Note OBJECTIVE: Staphylococcus genus comprising both Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase negative staphylococci (CoNS) are widely distributed in nature and can infect diversity of hosts. Indeed, staphylococci are the major pathogens causing biofilm associated infections caused by contaminated hospital indwelling devices. These infections are persistent in nature being highly refractory to various stresses including antibiotics. Implementation of efficient diagnostic techniques for the biofilm production would help minimize the disease burden. Thus, early detection of pathogenic strains producing biofilms warrant the utmost importance in diagnostic laboratories especially in resource limited settings. RESULT: Among 375 isolates collected from different clinical specimens, 214 (57%) were identified as coagulase negative staphylococci and 161 (43%) S. aureus. Detection of In-vitro biofilm formation in these isolates were carried out by three commonly used phenotypic assays and a genotypic assay. While evaluating the results, tissue-culture method with supplemented glucose and sucrose showed the best correlation with the results of genotypic assay. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13104-018-3820-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6180658/ /pubmed/30305150 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3820-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Note Manandhar, Sarita Singh, Anjana Varma, Ajit Pandey, Shanti Shrivastava, Neeraj Evaluation of methods to detect in vitro biofilm formation by staphylococcal clinical isolates |
title | Evaluation of methods to detect in vitro biofilm formation by staphylococcal clinical isolates |
title_full | Evaluation of methods to detect in vitro biofilm formation by staphylococcal clinical isolates |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of methods to detect in vitro biofilm formation by staphylococcal clinical isolates |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of methods to detect in vitro biofilm formation by staphylococcal clinical isolates |
title_short | Evaluation of methods to detect in vitro biofilm formation by staphylococcal clinical isolates |
title_sort | evaluation of methods to detect in vitro biofilm formation by staphylococcal clinical isolates |
topic | Research Note |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6180658/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30305150 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3820-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT manandharsarita evaluationofmethodstodetectinvitrobiofilmformationbystaphylococcalclinicalisolates AT singhanjana evaluationofmethodstodetectinvitrobiofilmformationbystaphylococcalclinicalisolates AT varmaajit evaluationofmethodstodetectinvitrobiofilmformationbystaphylococcalclinicalisolates AT pandeyshanti evaluationofmethodstodetectinvitrobiofilmformationbystaphylococcalclinicalisolates AT shrivastavaneeraj evaluationofmethodstodetectinvitrobiofilmformationbystaphylococcalclinicalisolates |