Cargando…

Protection against the overuse and underuse of health care – methodological considerations for establishing prioritization criteria and recommendations in general practice

BACKGROUND: Initiatives such as “Choosing Wisely” in the USA and “Smarter Medicine” in Switzerland have published lists of widely overused health care services. The German initiative “Choosing Wisely Together (Gemeinsam Klug Entscheiden)” follows this example. The goal of our study was to prioritize...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Muche-Borowski, Cathleen, Abiry, Dorit, Wagner, Hans-Otto, Barzel, Anne, Lühmann, Dagmar, Egidi, Günther, Kühlein, Thomas, Scherer, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6180663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30305090
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3569-9
_version_ 1783362253497565184
author Muche-Borowski, Cathleen
Abiry, Dorit
Wagner, Hans-Otto
Barzel, Anne
Lühmann, Dagmar
Egidi, Günther
Kühlein, Thomas
Scherer, Martin
author_facet Muche-Borowski, Cathleen
Abiry, Dorit
Wagner, Hans-Otto
Barzel, Anne
Lühmann, Dagmar
Egidi, Günther
Kühlein, Thomas
Scherer, Martin
author_sort Muche-Borowski, Cathleen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Initiatives such as “Choosing Wisely” in the USA and “Smarter Medicine” in Switzerland have published lists of widely overused health care services. The German initiative “Choosing Wisely Together (Gemeinsam Klug Entscheiden)” follows this example. The goal of our study was to prioritize important recommendations against the overuse and underuse of health care services. The final list of recommendations will be published in the German guideline “Protection against the overuse and underuse of health care”. METHODS: First, a multidisciplinary expert panel established a catalogue of prioritization criteria. Second, we extracted all the recommendations from evidence- and consensus-based German College of General Practice and Family Medicine (DEGAM) guidelines and National Health Care Guidelines (NVL). Third, the recommendations were rated by two independent panels (general practitioners and other health care professionals involved/not involved in guideline development). The prioritization process was finalized in a consensus conference held by DEGAM’s Standing Guideline Committee (SLK). RESULTS: Eleven prioritization criteria were established. A total of 782 recommendations were extracted and rated by 98 physicians and other health care professionals in a survey. In the voting process, more than 80% of the recommendations were eliminated. After the final consensus conference, twelve recommendations from DEGAM guidelines, nine DEGAM addenda and 17 NVL recommendations were chosen for inclusion in the guideline, for a total of 38 recommendations. CONCLUSION: The selection procedure proved helpful in identifying the highest priority recommendations with which to combat the overuse and underuse of health care services. To date, in Germany there has been no attempt to compile such a list by using a systematic and transparent methodology. Hence, the guideline that results from this process can fill an important gap.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6180663
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61806632018-10-18 Protection against the overuse and underuse of health care – methodological considerations for establishing prioritization criteria and recommendations in general practice Muche-Borowski, Cathleen Abiry, Dorit Wagner, Hans-Otto Barzel, Anne Lühmann, Dagmar Egidi, Günther Kühlein, Thomas Scherer, Martin BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Initiatives such as “Choosing Wisely” in the USA and “Smarter Medicine” in Switzerland have published lists of widely overused health care services. The German initiative “Choosing Wisely Together (Gemeinsam Klug Entscheiden)” follows this example. The goal of our study was to prioritize important recommendations against the overuse and underuse of health care services. The final list of recommendations will be published in the German guideline “Protection against the overuse and underuse of health care”. METHODS: First, a multidisciplinary expert panel established a catalogue of prioritization criteria. Second, we extracted all the recommendations from evidence- and consensus-based German College of General Practice and Family Medicine (DEGAM) guidelines and National Health Care Guidelines (NVL). Third, the recommendations were rated by two independent panels (general practitioners and other health care professionals involved/not involved in guideline development). The prioritization process was finalized in a consensus conference held by DEGAM’s Standing Guideline Committee (SLK). RESULTS: Eleven prioritization criteria were established. A total of 782 recommendations were extracted and rated by 98 physicians and other health care professionals in a survey. In the voting process, more than 80% of the recommendations were eliminated. After the final consensus conference, twelve recommendations from DEGAM guidelines, nine DEGAM addenda and 17 NVL recommendations were chosen for inclusion in the guideline, for a total of 38 recommendations. CONCLUSION: The selection procedure proved helpful in identifying the highest priority recommendations with which to combat the overuse and underuse of health care services. To date, in Germany there has been no attempt to compile such a list by using a systematic and transparent methodology. Hence, the guideline that results from this process can fill an important gap. BioMed Central 2018-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6180663/ /pubmed/30305090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3569-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Muche-Borowski, Cathleen
Abiry, Dorit
Wagner, Hans-Otto
Barzel, Anne
Lühmann, Dagmar
Egidi, Günther
Kühlein, Thomas
Scherer, Martin
Protection against the overuse and underuse of health care – methodological considerations for establishing prioritization criteria and recommendations in general practice
title Protection against the overuse and underuse of health care – methodological considerations for establishing prioritization criteria and recommendations in general practice
title_full Protection against the overuse and underuse of health care – methodological considerations for establishing prioritization criteria and recommendations in general practice
title_fullStr Protection against the overuse and underuse of health care – methodological considerations for establishing prioritization criteria and recommendations in general practice
title_full_unstemmed Protection against the overuse and underuse of health care – methodological considerations for establishing prioritization criteria and recommendations in general practice
title_short Protection against the overuse and underuse of health care – methodological considerations for establishing prioritization criteria and recommendations in general practice
title_sort protection against the overuse and underuse of health care – methodological considerations for establishing prioritization criteria and recommendations in general practice
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6180663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30305090
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3569-9
work_keys_str_mv AT mucheborowskicathleen protectionagainsttheoveruseandunderuseofhealthcaremethodologicalconsiderationsforestablishingprioritizationcriteriaandrecommendationsingeneralpractice
AT abirydorit protectionagainsttheoveruseandunderuseofhealthcaremethodologicalconsiderationsforestablishingprioritizationcriteriaandrecommendationsingeneralpractice
AT wagnerhansotto protectionagainsttheoveruseandunderuseofhealthcaremethodologicalconsiderationsforestablishingprioritizationcriteriaandrecommendationsingeneralpractice
AT barzelanne protectionagainsttheoveruseandunderuseofhealthcaremethodologicalconsiderationsforestablishingprioritizationcriteriaandrecommendationsingeneralpractice
AT luhmanndagmar protectionagainsttheoveruseandunderuseofhealthcaremethodologicalconsiderationsforestablishingprioritizationcriteriaandrecommendationsingeneralpractice
AT egidigunther protectionagainsttheoveruseandunderuseofhealthcaremethodologicalconsiderationsforestablishingprioritizationcriteriaandrecommendationsingeneralpractice
AT kuhleinthomas protectionagainsttheoveruseandunderuseofhealthcaremethodologicalconsiderationsforestablishingprioritizationcriteriaandrecommendationsingeneralpractice
AT scherermartin protectionagainsttheoveruseandunderuseofhealthcaremethodologicalconsiderationsforestablishingprioritizationcriteriaandrecommendationsingeneralpractice