Cargando…
2% lidocaine versus 3% prilocaine for oral and maxillofacial surgery
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the speed of action and injection discomfort of 2% lidocaine and 3% prilocaine for upper teeth extractions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-six patients were included in the prilocaine 3% group, and 46 in the lidocaine 2% control group. After all injections, soft and hard tiss...
Autores principales: | Alsharif, Ali, Omar, Esam, Alolayan, Al-Braa Badr, Bahabri, Rayan, Gazal, Giath |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6180686/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30429739 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_259_18 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Is prilocaine safe and potent enough for use in the oral surgery of medically compromised patients
por: Gazal, Giath
Publicado: (2019) -
Impact of maxillary teeth morphology on the failure rate of local anesthesia
por: Gazal, Giath, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Does articaine, rather than prilocaine, increase the success rate of anaesthesia for extraction of maxillary teeth
por: Gazal, Giath
Publicado: (2020) -
How Successful is Supplemental Intraseptal and Buccal Infiltration Anaesthesia in the Mandibular Molars of Patients Undergoing Root Canal Treatment or Tooth Extraction?
por: Gazal, Giath, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Comparison of onset anesthesia time and injection discomfort of 4% articaine and 2% mepivacaine during teeth extractions
por: Gazal, Giath, et al.
Publicado: (2017)