Cargando…

Primary Febrile Neutropenia Prophylaxis for Patients Who Receive FEC-D Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE: Despite widespread use of fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, docetaxel (FEC-D) chemotherapy in breast cancer, the optimal strategy for primary febrile neutropenia (FN) prophylaxis remains unknown. A systematic review was therefore performed. METHODS: Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, C...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fernandes, Ricardo, Mazzarello, Sasha, Stober, Carol, Ibrahim, Mohamed F.K., Dudani, Shaan, Perdrizet, Kirstin, Majeed, Habeeb, Vandermeer, Lisa, Shorr, Risa, Hutton, Brian, Fergusson, Dean, Gyawali, Bishal, Clemons, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society of Clinical Oncology 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6180804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30241156
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JGO.2016.008540
_version_ 1783362286140784640
author Fernandes, Ricardo
Mazzarello, Sasha
Stober, Carol
Ibrahim, Mohamed F.K.
Dudani, Shaan
Perdrizet, Kirstin
Majeed, Habeeb
Vandermeer, Lisa
Shorr, Risa
Hutton, Brian
Fergusson, Dean
Gyawali, Bishal
Clemons, Mark
author_facet Fernandes, Ricardo
Mazzarello, Sasha
Stober, Carol
Ibrahim, Mohamed F.K.
Dudani, Shaan
Perdrizet, Kirstin
Majeed, Habeeb
Vandermeer, Lisa
Shorr, Risa
Hutton, Brian
Fergusson, Dean
Gyawali, Bishal
Clemons, Mark
author_sort Fernandes, Ricardo
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Despite widespread use of fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, docetaxel (FEC-D) chemotherapy in breast cancer, the optimal strategy for primary febrile neutropenia (FN) prophylaxis remains unknown. A systematic review was therefore performed. METHODS: Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, and conference proceedings were searched from 1946 to April 2016 for trials that reported the effectiveness of primary FN prophylaxis with FEC-D chemotherapy. Outcome measures were incidence of FN; treatment-related hospitalizations; chemotherapy dose delays, reductions, and discontinuations; and adverse events from prophylaxis. RESULTS: Of 2,205 identified citations, eight studies (n = 1,250) met our eligibility criteria. Three additional studies (n = 293) were identified from a prior systematic review. Three randomized controlled trials (n = 576), one phase IV single-arm trial (n = 69), one prospective observational study (n = 37), and six retrospective studies (n = 861) were identified. Agents investigated were pegfilgrastim (n = 108), filgrastim (n = 1,119), and ciprofloxacin (n = 89). The heterogeneity of studies meant that a narrative synthesis of results was performed. Median FN rates for patients who received FEC-D with and without primary prophylaxis were 10.1% (interquartile range [IQR], 3.9% to 22.6%) and 23.9% (IQR, 9.2% to 27.3%), respectively. In the absence of primary prophylaxis, FN was more common during docetaxel than during FEC. Data from six studies showed a median rate of dose reductions and delays of 6.1% (IQR, 3.1% to 14.3%) and 19.3% (IQR, 10.5% to 32.8%), respectively, that occurred as a consequence of FN. Toxicity from prophylaxis itself was rarely reported. CONCLUSION: Primary FN prophylaxis is effective in patients who receive FEC-D chemotherapy. The paucity of prospective data makes optimal recommendations about the choice and timing of prophylaxis challenging.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6180804
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher American Society of Clinical Oncology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61808042018-11-13 Primary Febrile Neutropenia Prophylaxis for Patients Who Receive FEC-D Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review Fernandes, Ricardo Mazzarello, Sasha Stober, Carol Ibrahim, Mohamed F.K. Dudani, Shaan Perdrizet, Kirstin Majeed, Habeeb Vandermeer, Lisa Shorr, Risa Hutton, Brian Fergusson, Dean Gyawali, Bishal Clemons, Mark J Glob Oncol Review Article PURPOSE: Despite widespread use of fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, docetaxel (FEC-D) chemotherapy in breast cancer, the optimal strategy for primary febrile neutropenia (FN) prophylaxis remains unknown. A systematic review was therefore performed. METHODS: Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, and conference proceedings were searched from 1946 to April 2016 for trials that reported the effectiveness of primary FN prophylaxis with FEC-D chemotherapy. Outcome measures were incidence of FN; treatment-related hospitalizations; chemotherapy dose delays, reductions, and discontinuations; and adverse events from prophylaxis. RESULTS: Of 2,205 identified citations, eight studies (n = 1,250) met our eligibility criteria. Three additional studies (n = 293) were identified from a prior systematic review. Three randomized controlled trials (n = 576), one phase IV single-arm trial (n = 69), one prospective observational study (n = 37), and six retrospective studies (n = 861) were identified. Agents investigated were pegfilgrastim (n = 108), filgrastim (n = 1,119), and ciprofloxacin (n = 89). The heterogeneity of studies meant that a narrative synthesis of results was performed. Median FN rates for patients who received FEC-D with and without primary prophylaxis were 10.1% (interquartile range [IQR], 3.9% to 22.6%) and 23.9% (IQR, 9.2% to 27.3%), respectively. In the absence of primary prophylaxis, FN was more common during docetaxel than during FEC. Data from six studies showed a median rate of dose reductions and delays of 6.1% (IQR, 3.1% to 14.3%) and 19.3% (IQR, 10.5% to 32.8%), respectively, that occurred as a consequence of FN. Toxicity from prophylaxis itself was rarely reported. CONCLUSION: Primary FN prophylaxis is effective in patients who receive FEC-D chemotherapy. The paucity of prospective data makes optimal recommendations about the choice and timing of prophylaxis challenging. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2017-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6180804/ /pubmed/30241156 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JGO.2016.008540 Text en © 2017 by American Society of Clinical Oncology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Review Article
Fernandes, Ricardo
Mazzarello, Sasha
Stober, Carol
Ibrahim, Mohamed F.K.
Dudani, Shaan
Perdrizet, Kirstin
Majeed, Habeeb
Vandermeer, Lisa
Shorr, Risa
Hutton, Brian
Fergusson, Dean
Gyawali, Bishal
Clemons, Mark
Primary Febrile Neutropenia Prophylaxis for Patients Who Receive FEC-D Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review
title Primary Febrile Neutropenia Prophylaxis for Patients Who Receive FEC-D Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review
title_full Primary Febrile Neutropenia Prophylaxis for Patients Who Receive FEC-D Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Primary Febrile Neutropenia Prophylaxis for Patients Who Receive FEC-D Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Primary Febrile Neutropenia Prophylaxis for Patients Who Receive FEC-D Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review
title_short Primary Febrile Neutropenia Prophylaxis for Patients Who Receive FEC-D Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review
title_sort primary febrile neutropenia prophylaxis for patients who receive fec-d chemotherapy for breast cancer: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6180804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30241156
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JGO.2016.008540
work_keys_str_mv AT fernandesricardo primaryfebrileneutropeniaprophylaxisforpatientswhoreceivefecdchemotherapyforbreastcancerasystematicreview
AT mazzarellosasha primaryfebrileneutropeniaprophylaxisforpatientswhoreceivefecdchemotherapyforbreastcancerasystematicreview
AT stobercarol primaryfebrileneutropeniaprophylaxisforpatientswhoreceivefecdchemotherapyforbreastcancerasystematicreview
AT ibrahimmohamedfk primaryfebrileneutropeniaprophylaxisforpatientswhoreceivefecdchemotherapyforbreastcancerasystematicreview
AT dudanishaan primaryfebrileneutropeniaprophylaxisforpatientswhoreceivefecdchemotherapyforbreastcancerasystematicreview
AT perdrizetkirstin primaryfebrileneutropeniaprophylaxisforpatientswhoreceivefecdchemotherapyforbreastcancerasystematicreview
AT majeedhabeeb primaryfebrileneutropeniaprophylaxisforpatientswhoreceivefecdchemotherapyforbreastcancerasystematicreview
AT vandermeerlisa primaryfebrileneutropeniaprophylaxisforpatientswhoreceivefecdchemotherapyforbreastcancerasystematicreview
AT shorrrisa primaryfebrileneutropeniaprophylaxisforpatientswhoreceivefecdchemotherapyforbreastcancerasystematicreview
AT huttonbrian primaryfebrileneutropeniaprophylaxisforpatientswhoreceivefecdchemotherapyforbreastcancerasystematicreview
AT fergussondean primaryfebrileneutropeniaprophylaxisforpatientswhoreceivefecdchemotherapyforbreastcancerasystematicreview
AT gyawalibishal primaryfebrileneutropeniaprophylaxisforpatientswhoreceivefecdchemotherapyforbreastcancerasystematicreview
AT clemonsmark primaryfebrileneutropeniaprophylaxisforpatientswhoreceivefecdchemotherapyforbreastcancerasystematicreview