Cargando…
Applying Gini coefficient to evaluate the author research domains associated with the ordering of author names: A bibliometric study
BACKGROUND: Team science research includes the number of coauthors in publications. Many papers have discussed the ordering of author names and the contributions of authors to a paper. However, no paper addresses the relation between authors’ research domains and personal impact factors (PIF) with t...
Autores principales: | Chien, Tsair-Wei, Chow, Julie Chi, Chang, Yu, Chou, Willy |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6181458/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30278518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000012418 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The 10 top-cited authors who published papers in journal medicine since 2000 using the betweenness centrality to identify unique names: Bibliometric analysis
por: Chang, Chi-Sheng, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
A leading author of meta-analysis does not have a dominant contribution to research based on the CJAL score: Bibliometric analysis
por: Chow, Julie Chi, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Comparison of Ferguson’s δ and the Gini coefficient used for measuring the inequality of data related to health quality of life outcomes
por: Wang, Hsien-Yi, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Evaluating the research domain and achievement for a productive researcher who published 114 sole-author articles: A bibliometric analysis
por: Liu, Mei-Yuan, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
A leading bibliometric author does not have a dominant contribution to research based on the CJAL score: Bibliometric analysis
por: Tam, Hon-Pheng, et al.
Publicado: (2023)