Cargando…
Feasibility and Efficacy of Transient Elastography using the XL probe to diagnose liver fibrosis and cirrhosis: A meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Transient elastography (TE) has been validated as an effective noninvasive tool for the assessment of liver fibrosis. The XL probe is a new probe that was initially designed for use in patients with obesity. A meta-analysis was performed to assess the feasibility and efficacy of TE using...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6181481/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30278481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011816 |
_version_ | 1783362408060813312 |
---|---|
author | Xia, Bingqing Wang, Fengyan Friedrich-Rust, Mireen Zhou, Fang Zhu, Jingyu Yang, Hua Ruan, Weishan Zeng, Zhirong |
author_facet | Xia, Bingqing Wang, Fengyan Friedrich-Rust, Mireen Zhou, Fang Zhu, Jingyu Yang, Hua Ruan, Weishan Zeng, Zhirong |
author_sort | Xia, Bingqing |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Transient elastography (TE) has been validated as an effective noninvasive tool for the assessment of liver fibrosis. The XL probe is a new probe that was initially designed for use in patients with obesity. A meta-analysis was performed to assess the feasibility and efficacy of TE using the XL probe. METHODS: In September 2016, we systematically searched the PubMed and Science Direct search engines. The feasibility of TE was evaluated based on the failure rate and the results of the unreliable liver stiffness measurement (LSM). The efficacy of TE was measured using sensitivity, specificity, and summary receiver-operating characteristic as measures/indices assessed in different stages of fibrosis. Heterogeneity was measured using the chi-squared test and the Q-statistic. We used the 95% confidence interval (95% CI) as an effect measure. RESULTS: We included 8 studies in the meta-analysis. When the XL was compared to the M probe, the former showed a lower risk of failure rate [relative risk (RR) 0.24, 95% CI 0.14–0.38]. In patients with a body mass index ≥30 kg/m(2), the XL probe showed a statistically significantly lower risk of failure rate (RR 0.16, 95% CI 0.08–0.32) but no significant improvement (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.50–1.16) in the unreliable LSM result. In patients showing liver fibrosis stage ≥F2, the XL probe showed a sensitivity of 0.56 (95% CI 0.39–0.72), specificity of 0.71 (95% CI 0.61–0.79), and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.71. The results observed in patients with liver fibrosis stage F4 were more promising with a sensitivity of 0.84 (95% CI 0.76–0.90), specificity of 0.78 (95% CI 0.70–0.84), and an AUC of 0.88. CONCLUSION: TE using the XL probe demonstrates significant diagnostic utility in patients with liver fibrosis and is likely to be more reliable than the M probe in patients with obesity. Large prospective multicenter studies are, however, necessary to establish the new cut-off values to be used for the XL probe in patients with obesity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6181481 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61814812018-10-15 Feasibility and Efficacy of Transient Elastography using the XL probe to diagnose liver fibrosis and cirrhosis: A meta-analysis Xia, Bingqing Wang, Fengyan Friedrich-Rust, Mireen Zhou, Fang Zhu, Jingyu Yang, Hua Ruan, Weishan Zeng, Zhirong Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article BACKGROUND: Transient elastography (TE) has been validated as an effective noninvasive tool for the assessment of liver fibrosis. The XL probe is a new probe that was initially designed for use in patients with obesity. A meta-analysis was performed to assess the feasibility and efficacy of TE using the XL probe. METHODS: In September 2016, we systematically searched the PubMed and Science Direct search engines. The feasibility of TE was evaluated based on the failure rate and the results of the unreliable liver stiffness measurement (LSM). The efficacy of TE was measured using sensitivity, specificity, and summary receiver-operating characteristic as measures/indices assessed in different stages of fibrosis. Heterogeneity was measured using the chi-squared test and the Q-statistic. We used the 95% confidence interval (95% CI) as an effect measure. RESULTS: We included 8 studies in the meta-analysis. When the XL was compared to the M probe, the former showed a lower risk of failure rate [relative risk (RR) 0.24, 95% CI 0.14–0.38]. In patients with a body mass index ≥30 kg/m(2), the XL probe showed a statistically significantly lower risk of failure rate (RR 0.16, 95% CI 0.08–0.32) but no significant improvement (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.50–1.16) in the unreliable LSM result. In patients showing liver fibrosis stage ≥F2, the XL probe showed a sensitivity of 0.56 (95% CI 0.39–0.72), specificity of 0.71 (95% CI 0.61–0.79), and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.71. The results observed in patients with liver fibrosis stage F4 were more promising with a sensitivity of 0.84 (95% CI 0.76–0.90), specificity of 0.78 (95% CI 0.70–0.84), and an AUC of 0.88. CONCLUSION: TE using the XL probe demonstrates significant diagnostic utility in patients with liver fibrosis and is likely to be more reliable than the M probe in patients with obesity. Large prospective multicenter studies are, however, necessary to establish the new cut-off values to be used for the XL probe in patients with obesity. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6181481/ /pubmed/30278481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011816 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
spellingShingle | Research Article Xia, Bingqing Wang, Fengyan Friedrich-Rust, Mireen Zhou, Fang Zhu, Jingyu Yang, Hua Ruan, Weishan Zeng, Zhirong Feasibility and Efficacy of Transient Elastography using the XL probe to diagnose liver fibrosis and cirrhosis: A meta-analysis |
title | Feasibility and Efficacy of Transient Elastography using the XL probe to diagnose liver fibrosis and cirrhosis: A meta-analysis |
title_full | Feasibility and Efficacy of Transient Elastography using the XL probe to diagnose liver fibrosis and cirrhosis: A meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Feasibility and Efficacy of Transient Elastography using the XL probe to diagnose liver fibrosis and cirrhosis: A meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Feasibility and Efficacy of Transient Elastography using the XL probe to diagnose liver fibrosis and cirrhosis: A meta-analysis |
title_short | Feasibility and Efficacy of Transient Elastography using the XL probe to diagnose liver fibrosis and cirrhosis: A meta-analysis |
title_sort | feasibility and efficacy of transient elastography using the xl probe to diagnose liver fibrosis and cirrhosis: a meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6181481/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30278481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011816 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xiabingqing feasibilityandefficacyoftransientelastographyusingthexlprobetodiagnoseliverfibrosisandcirrhosisametaanalysis AT wangfengyan feasibilityandefficacyoftransientelastographyusingthexlprobetodiagnoseliverfibrosisandcirrhosisametaanalysis AT friedrichrustmireen feasibilityandefficacyoftransientelastographyusingthexlprobetodiagnoseliverfibrosisandcirrhosisametaanalysis AT zhoufang feasibilityandefficacyoftransientelastographyusingthexlprobetodiagnoseliverfibrosisandcirrhosisametaanalysis AT zhujingyu feasibilityandefficacyoftransientelastographyusingthexlprobetodiagnoseliverfibrosisandcirrhosisametaanalysis AT yanghua feasibilityandefficacyoftransientelastographyusingthexlprobetodiagnoseliverfibrosisandcirrhosisametaanalysis AT ruanweishan feasibilityandefficacyoftransientelastographyusingthexlprobetodiagnoseliverfibrosisandcirrhosisametaanalysis AT zengzhirong feasibilityandefficacyoftransientelastographyusingthexlprobetodiagnoseliverfibrosisandcirrhosisametaanalysis |