Cargando…

Effects of neurofeedback versus methylphenidate for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of head-to-head trials

INTRODUCTION: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is developmental disorder characterized by inattention and/or hyperactivity/impulsivity. Psychostimulants, including methylphenidate (MPH), are recommended as a first-line pharmacological intervention, whereas neurofeedback (NF) has been...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yan, Lixia, Zhang, Junhua, Yuan, Yang, Cortese, Samuele
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6181550/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30278582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000012623
_version_ 1783362424565399552
author Yan, Lixia
Zhang, Junhua
Yuan, Yang
Cortese, Samuele
author_facet Yan, Lixia
Zhang, Junhua
Yuan, Yang
Cortese, Samuele
author_sort Yan, Lixia
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is developmental disorder characterized by inattention and/or hyperactivity/impulsivity. Psychostimulants, including methylphenidate (MPH), are recommended as a first-line pharmacological intervention, whereas neurofeedback (NF) has been proposed as a nonpharmacological option. The comparative effects of MPH and NF need further exploration. We will conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of head-to-head randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy and/or tolerability of MPH and NF in children/adolescents and adults with ADHD. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: We will include published as well as unpublished data. Two investigators will independently search PubMed, OVID, ERIC, Web of Science, ClinialTrials.gov, and a set of Chinese databases, including CNKI, CQVIP, and WanFang for head-to-head RCTs comparing MPH and NF. Experts will be contacted for unpublished data. The primary outcome will be the efficacy on ADHD core symptoms, measured by the change in the severity of ADHD symptoms, from baseline to endpoint and, if available, at follow-up (at any available time point). Secondary outcomes will be: dropouts for any reasons; efficacy on neuropsychological measures (working memory, inattention, and inhibition). We will conduct subgroup analyses to assess the impact of the following variables: age; type of NF; language of publication; comorbidities. Additionally, we will carry out meta-regression analyses to investigate the effect of sponsorship, year of publication, duration of intervention, and age of participants. Sensitivity analyses will be conducted to test the robustness of the findings. Risk of bias of individual studies will be assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Analyses will be performed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical issues are foreseen. Results from this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant national and international conferences. TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42018090256.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6181550
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61815502018-10-15 Effects of neurofeedback versus methylphenidate for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of head-to-head trials Yan, Lixia Zhang, Junhua Yuan, Yang Cortese, Samuele Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article INTRODUCTION: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is developmental disorder characterized by inattention and/or hyperactivity/impulsivity. Psychostimulants, including methylphenidate (MPH), are recommended as a first-line pharmacological intervention, whereas neurofeedback (NF) has been proposed as a nonpharmacological option. The comparative effects of MPH and NF need further exploration. We will conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of head-to-head randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy and/or tolerability of MPH and NF in children/adolescents and adults with ADHD. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: We will include published as well as unpublished data. Two investigators will independently search PubMed, OVID, ERIC, Web of Science, ClinialTrials.gov, and a set of Chinese databases, including CNKI, CQVIP, and WanFang for head-to-head RCTs comparing MPH and NF. Experts will be contacted for unpublished data. The primary outcome will be the efficacy on ADHD core symptoms, measured by the change in the severity of ADHD symptoms, from baseline to endpoint and, if available, at follow-up (at any available time point). Secondary outcomes will be: dropouts for any reasons; efficacy on neuropsychological measures (working memory, inattention, and inhibition). We will conduct subgroup analyses to assess the impact of the following variables: age; type of NF; language of publication; comorbidities. Additionally, we will carry out meta-regression analyses to investigate the effect of sponsorship, year of publication, duration of intervention, and age of participants. Sensitivity analyses will be conducted to test the robustness of the findings. Risk of bias of individual studies will be assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Analyses will be performed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical issues are foreseen. Results from this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant national and international conferences. TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42018090256. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6181550/ /pubmed/30278582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000012623 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Yan, Lixia
Zhang, Junhua
Yuan, Yang
Cortese, Samuele
Effects of neurofeedback versus methylphenidate for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of head-to-head trials
title Effects of neurofeedback versus methylphenidate for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of head-to-head trials
title_full Effects of neurofeedback versus methylphenidate for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of head-to-head trials
title_fullStr Effects of neurofeedback versus methylphenidate for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of head-to-head trials
title_full_unstemmed Effects of neurofeedback versus methylphenidate for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of head-to-head trials
title_short Effects of neurofeedback versus methylphenidate for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of head-to-head trials
title_sort effects of neurofeedback versus methylphenidate for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of head-to-head trials
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6181550/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30278582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000012623
work_keys_str_mv AT yanlixia effectsofneurofeedbackversusmethylphenidateforthetreatmentofattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofheadtoheadtrials
AT zhangjunhua effectsofneurofeedbackversusmethylphenidateforthetreatmentofattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofheadtoheadtrials
AT yuanyang effectsofneurofeedbackversusmethylphenidateforthetreatmentofattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofheadtoheadtrials
AT cortesesamuele effectsofneurofeedbackversusmethylphenidateforthetreatmentofattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofheadtoheadtrials