Cargando…

Vonoprazan versus proton pump inhibitors for the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: A protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Vonoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocking agent, is used in the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). We aim to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis for the comparison of the effects of vonoprazan and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in GERD in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kang, Hyun, Kim, Beom Jin, Choi, Geunjoo, Kim, Jae Gyu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6181618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30278564
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000012574
_version_ 1783362439428964352
author Kang, Hyun
Kim, Beom Jin
Choi, Geunjoo
Kim, Jae Gyu
author_facet Kang, Hyun
Kim, Beom Jin
Choi, Geunjoo
Kim, Jae Gyu
author_sort Kang, Hyun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIM: Vonoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocking agent, is used in the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). We aim to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis for the comparison of the effects of vonoprazan and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in GERD in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: A systematic and comprehensive search will be performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Google Scholar, and clinical trial registries, for studies published up to September 2018. Only randomized clinical trials will be included. Primary outcomes of symptoms and esophageal erosion improvement in the intention-to-treat analysis, and secondary outcomes of symptoms and esophageal erosion improvement rate in the per protocol analysis, the comparative efficacy in terms of healing rate of esophageal erosion on endoscopy, the comparative efficacy in terms of improvement of esophageal impedance-pH study, adverse events, long-term safety, and the comparative efficacy in terms of CYP2C19 metabolite levels will be studied. The quality of included studies will be assessed using the modified risk of bias tool. Heterogeneity of estimates across studies as well as publication bias will be assessed. This systematic review and meta-analysis will be performed according to the protocol recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration and reported according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. All statistical analyses will be conducted using Stata SE version 15.0. RESULTS: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this systematic review and meta-analysis will be the first to evaluate existing research comparing Vonoprazan and PPIs in GERD. Our study will provide information about the effect of vonoprazan and PPIs in GERD in RCTs. The review will benefit patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6181618
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61816182018-10-15 Vonoprazan versus proton pump inhibitors for the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: A protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis Kang, Hyun Kim, Beom Jin Choi, Geunjoo Kim, Jae Gyu Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article BACKGROUND AND AIM: Vonoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocking agent, is used in the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). We aim to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis for the comparison of the effects of vonoprazan and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in GERD in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: A systematic and comprehensive search will be performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Google Scholar, and clinical trial registries, for studies published up to September 2018. Only randomized clinical trials will be included. Primary outcomes of symptoms and esophageal erosion improvement in the intention-to-treat analysis, and secondary outcomes of symptoms and esophageal erosion improvement rate in the per protocol analysis, the comparative efficacy in terms of healing rate of esophageal erosion on endoscopy, the comparative efficacy in terms of improvement of esophageal impedance-pH study, adverse events, long-term safety, and the comparative efficacy in terms of CYP2C19 metabolite levels will be studied. The quality of included studies will be assessed using the modified risk of bias tool. Heterogeneity of estimates across studies as well as publication bias will be assessed. This systematic review and meta-analysis will be performed according to the protocol recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration and reported according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. All statistical analyses will be conducted using Stata SE version 15.0. RESULTS: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this systematic review and meta-analysis will be the first to evaluate existing research comparing Vonoprazan and PPIs in GERD. Our study will provide information about the effect of vonoprazan and PPIs in GERD in RCTs. The review will benefit patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6181618/ /pubmed/30278564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000012574 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Kang, Hyun
Kim, Beom Jin
Choi, Geunjoo
Kim, Jae Gyu
Vonoprazan versus proton pump inhibitors for the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: A protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis
title Vonoprazan versus proton pump inhibitors for the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: A protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis
title_full Vonoprazan versus proton pump inhibitors for the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: A protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis
title_fullStr Vonoprazan versus proton pump inhibitors for the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: A protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Vonoprazan versus proton pump inhibitors for the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: A protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis
title_short Vonoprazan versus proton pump inhibitors for the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: A protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis
title_sort vonoprazan versus proton pump inhibitors for the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6181618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30278564
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000012574
work_keys_str_mv AT kanghyun vonoprazanversusprotonpumpinhibitorsforthemanagementofgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseaprotocolforasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT kimbeomjin vonoprazanversusprotonpumpinhibitorsforthemanagementofgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseaprotocolforasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT choigeunjoo vonoprazanversusprotonpumpinhibitorsforthemanagementofgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseaprotocolforasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT kimjaegyu vonoprazanversusprotonpumpinhibitorsforthemanagementofgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseaprotocolforasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis