Cargando…

Comparison of periprosthetic bone remodeling after implantation of anatomic and tapered cementless femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty: A prospective cohort study protocol

INTRODUCTION: Current total hip arthroplasty (THA) implant usage trends favor cementless fixation, and plenty studies have demonstrated that numbers of cementless femoral stems are associated with excellent long-term survivorship and functional outcomes. Various types of cementless femoral stems hav...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Xiang-Dong, Chen, Yu, Wang, Zhang-Yu, Li, Yu-Jian, Zhu, Zheng-Lin, Tao, Yu-Zhang, Chen, Hong, Cheng, Qiang, Huang, Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6181628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30278556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000012560
_version_ 1783362441863757824
author Wu, Xiang-Dong
Chen, Yu
Wang, Zhang-Yu
Li, Yu-Jian
Zhu, Zheng-Lin
Tao, Yu-Zhang
Chen, Hong
Cheng, Qiang
Huang, Wei
author_facet Wu, Xiang-Dong
Chen, Yu
Wang, Zhang-Yu
Li, Yu-Jian
Zhu, Zheng-Lin
Tao, Yu-Zhang
Chen, Hong
Cheng, Qiang
Huang, Wei
author_sort Wu, Xiang-Dong
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Current total hip arthroplasty (THA) implant usage trends favor cementless fixation, and plenty studies have demonstrated that numbers of cementless femoral stems are associated with excellent long-term survivorship and functional outcomes. Various types of cementless femoral stems have been developed and utilized in multiple applications, including straight, tapered, anatomic, customized, short, and even neck stems. All of these designs aimed to achieve maximal primary stability and promote osseointegration. Nevertheless, stress-shielding and periprosthetic bone loss continue to occur and remain critical issues in promoting long-term survivorship of THA. Considering anatomic and tapered stems are the most popular cementless designs today, this prospective cohort study aimed to investigate the effect of stem design on stress-shielding and periprosthetic bone remodeling after implantation of an anatomic stem with proximal fixation (Ribbed Hip system; Waldemar Link, Hamburg, Germany) and the direct comparison to a fully coated tapered stem (LCU Hip system; Waldemar Link). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective cohort study will comprise patients who receive primary unilateral THA with the Ribbed anatomic hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated stem or LCU tapered fully HA-coated stem. The changes in periprosthetic bone mineral density after insertion of Ribbed and LCU stem prostheses will be assessed by means of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the periprosthetic region of interest according to Gruen and colleagues. Standard anteroposterior and lateral plain radiography will be performed for qualitative assessment of the periprosthetic bone remodeling. The following items will be analyzed or measured on follow-up radiographs to compare with the initial appearance on the radiographs taken immediately postoperatively: cortical thickness in each Gruen zone, fitness of the distal stem within the isthmus, femoral stem alignment, radiolucent line, reactive line, periosteal bone reactions, and subsidence. Biologic fixation and stability of the cementless implant will be evaluated using Engh grading scale, and heterotopic ossification will be graded according to Brooker classification. Furthermore, Harris hip score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Score will also be assessed for postoperative functional evaluation. These radiologic and clinical assessments will be taken postoperatively, at 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years after surgery. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Ethics Committee. The study results will be disseminated at national and international conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals. STUDY REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (http://www.chictr.org.cn): ChiCTR1800017841.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6181628
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61816282018-10-15 Comparison of periprosthetic bone remodeling after implantation of anatomic and tapered cementless femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty: A prospective cohort study protocol Wu, Xiang-Dong Chen, Yu Wang, Zhang-Yu Li, Yu-Jian Zhu, Zheng-Lin Tao, Yu-Zhang Chen, Hong Cheng, Qiang Huang, Wei Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article INTRODUCTION: Current total hip arthroplasty (THA) implant usage trends favor cementless fixation, and plenty studies have demonstrated that numbers of cementless femoral stems are associated with excellent long-term survivorship and functional outcomes. Various types of cementless femoral stems have been developed and utilized in multiple applications, including straight, tapered, anatomic, customized, short, and even neck stems. All of these designs aimed to achieve maximal primary stability and promote osseointegration. Nevertheless, stress-shielding and periprosthetic bone loss continue to occur and remain critical issues in promoting long-term survivorship of THA. Considering anatomic and tapered stems are the most popular cementless designs today, this prospective cohort study aimed to investigate the effect of stem design on stress-shielding and periprosthetic bone remodeling after implantation of an anatomic stem with proximal fixation (Ribbed Hip system; Waldemar Link, Hamburg, Germany) and the direct comparison to a fully coated tapered stem (LCU Hip system; Waldemar Link). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective cohort study will comprise patients who receive primary unilateral THA with the Ribbed anatomic hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated stem or LCU tapered fully HA-coated stem. The changes in periprosthetic bone mineral density after insertion of Ribbed and LCU stem prostheses will be assessed by means of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the periprosthetic region of interest according to Gruen and colleagues. Standard anteroposterior and lateral plain radiography will be performed for qualitative assessment of the periprosthetic bone remodeling. The following items will be analyzed or measured on follow-up radiographs to compare with the initial appearance on the radiographs taken immediately postoperatively: cortical thickness in each Gruen zone, fitness of the distal stem within the isthmus, femoral stem alignment, radiolucent line, reactive line, periosteal bone reactions, and subsidence. Biologic fixation and stability of the cementless implant will be evaluated using Engh grading scale, and heterotopic ossification will be graded according to Brooker classification. Furthermore, Harris hip score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Score will also be assessed for postoperative functional evaluation. These radiologic and clinical assessments will be taken postoperatively, at 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years after surgery. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Ethics Committee. The study results will be disseminated at national and international conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals. STUDY REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (http://www.chictr.org.cn): ChiCTR1800017841. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6181628/ /pubmed/30278556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000012560 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Wu, Xiang-Dong
Chen, Yu
Wang, Zhang-Yu
Li, Yu-Jian
Zhu, Zheng-Lin
Tao, Yu-Zhang
Chen, Hong
Cheng, Qiang
Huang, Wei
Comparison of periprosthetic bone remodeling after implantation of anatomic and tapered cementless femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty: A prospective cohort study protocol
title Comparison of periprosthetic bone remodeling after implantation of anatomic and tapered cementless femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty: A prospective cohort study protocol
title_full Comparison of periprosthetic bone remodeling after implantation of anatomic and tapered cementless femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty: A prospective cohort study protocol
title_fullStr Comparison of periprosthetic bone remodeling after implantation of anatomic and tapered cementless femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty: A prospective cohort study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of periprosthetic bone remodeling after implantation of anatomic and tapered cementless femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty: A prospective cohort study protocol
title_short Comparison of periprosthetic bone remodeling after implantation of anatomic and tapered cementless femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty: A prospective cohort study protocol
title_sort comparison of periprosthetic bone remodeling after implantation of anatomic and tapered cementless femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study protocol
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6181628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30278556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000012560
work_keys_str_mv AT wuxiangdong comparisonofperiprostheticboneremodelingafterimplantationofanatomicandtaperedcementlessfemoralstemsintotalhiparthroplastyaprospectivecohortstudyprotocol
AT chenyu comparisonofperiprostheticboneremodelingafterimplantationofanatomicandtaperedcementlessfemoralstemsintotalhiparthroplastyaprospectivecohortstudyprotocol
AT wangzhangyu comparisonofperiprostheticboneremodelingafterimplantationofanatomicandtaperedcementlessfemoralstemsintotalhiparthroplastyaprospectivecohortstudyprotocol
AT liyujian comparisonofperiprostheticboneremodelingafterimplantationofanatomicandtaperedcementlessfemoralstemsintotalhiparthroplastyaprospectivecohortstudyprotocol
AT zhuzhenglin comparisonofperiprostheticboneremodelingafterimplantationofanatomicandtaperedcementlessfemoralstemsintotalhiparthroplastyaprospectivecohortstudyprotocol
AT taoyuzhang comparisonofperiprostheticboneremodelingafterimplantationofanatomicandtaperedcementlessfemoralstemsintotalhiparthroplastyaprospectivecohortstudyprotocol
AT chenhong comparisonofperiprostheticboneremodelingafterimplantationofanatomicandtaperedcementlessfemoralstemsintotalhiparthroplastyaprospectivecohortstudyprotocol
AT chengqiang comparisonofperiprostheticboneremodelingafterimplantationofanatomicandtaperedcementlessfemoralstemsintotalhiparthroplastyaprospectivecohortstudyprotocol
AT huangwei comparisonofperiprostheticboneremodelingafterimplantationofanatomicandtaperedcementlessfemoralstemsintotalhiparthroplastyaprospectivecohortstudyprotocol