Cargando…

Patients First: Toward a Patient-Centered Instrument to Measure Impact of Chronic Pain

BACKGROUND: Numerous instruments are available to measure the impact of chronic pain, yet most have been developed with little or no patient involvement. This study seeks to start bridging that gap by determining which health aspects or attributes (to be included in a future instrument) are consider...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reneman, Michiel F, Brandsema, Kees P D, Schrier, Ernst, Dijkstra, Pieter U, Krabbe, Paul F M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6181955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29939365
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzy040
_version_ 1783362467247685632
author Reneman, Michiel F
Brandsema, Kees P D
Schrier, Ernst
Dijkstra, Pieter U
Krabbe, Paul F M
author_facet Reneman, Michiel F
Brandsema, Kees P D
Schrier, Ernst
Dijkstra, Pieter U
Krabbe, Paul F M
author_sort Reneman, Michiel F
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Numerous instruments are available to measure the impact of chronic pain, yet most have been developed with little or no patient involvement. This study seeks to start bridging that gap by determining which health aspects or attributes (to be included in a future instrument) are considered most important by people with chronic pain. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to reveal which attributes reflecting impact of chronic pain are considered most important by people with chronic pain and to analyze differences in importance according to gender, age categories, diagnostic subgroups, and pain intensity categories. DESIGN: This study used a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design: literature search, focus group meetings, and online survey. METHODS: First, a literature search was performed to identify the attributes in existing instruments. In 68 instruments meeting inclusion criteria, 155 unique attributes were identified, 85 of which remained after applying the exclusion criteria. Second, 2 focus group meetings, with 6 and 4 patients, respectively, were held to verify that no attributes had been missed. Three attributes were subsequently added. Third, individuals with chronic pain were then sent an online survey through several patient organizations. RESULTS: A total of 939 patients were asked to select the 8 attributes they deemed most important, which resulted in the following list: fatigue, social life, cramped muscles, sleeping, housekeeping, concentration, not being understood, and control over pain. The importance assigned to these 8 attributes varied slightly according to age, gender, and diagnostic subgroup. LIMITATIONS: Participation rate could not be established because of the online survey. CONCLUSIONS: Attributes reflecting impact of chronic pain deemed most important by patients are revealed. Importance of impact differs according to subgroups. The “patients-first” methodology used here revealed attributes that were not comprehensively covered in currently available instruments for measuring the impact of chronic pain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6181955
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61819552018-10-18 Patients First: Toward a Patient-Centered Instrument to Measure Impact of Chronic Pain Reneman, Michiel F Brandsema, Kees P D Schrier, Ernst Dijkstra, Pieter U Krabbe, Paul F M Phys Ther Original Research BACKGROUND: Numerous instruments are available to measure the impact of chronic pain, yet most have been developed with little or no patient involvement. This study seeks to start bridging that gap by determining which health aspects or attributes (to be included in a future instrument) are considered most important by people with chronic pain. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to reveal which attributes reflecting impact of chronic pain are considered most important by people with chronic pain and to analyze differences in importance according to gender, age categories, diagnostic subgroups, and pain intensity categories. DESIGN: This study used a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design: literature search, focus group meetings, and online survey. METHODS: First, a literature search was performed to identify the attributes in existing instruments. In 68 instruments meeting inclusion criteria, 155 unique attributes were identified, 85 of which remained after applying the exclusion criteria. Second, 2 focus group meetings, with 6 and 4 patients, respectively, were held to verify that no attributes had been missed. Three attributes were subsequently added. Third, individuals with chronic pain were then sent an online survey through several patient organizations. RESULTS: A total of 939 patients were asked to select the 8 attributes they deemed most important, which resulted in the following list: fatigue, social life, cramped muscles, sleeping, housekeeping, concentration, not being understood, and control over pain. The importance assigned to these 8 attributes varied slightly according to age, gender, and diagnostic subgroup. LIMITATIONS: Participation rate could not be established because of the online survey. CONCLUSIONS: Attributes reflecting impact of chronic pain deemed most important by patients are revealed. Importance of impact differs according to subgroups. The “patients-first” methodology used here revealed attributes that were not comprehensively covered in currently available instruments for measuring the impact of chronic pain. Oxford University Press 2018-07 2018-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6181955/ /pubmed/29939365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzy040 Text en © American Physical Therapy Association 2018. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Research
Reneman, Michiel F
Brandsema, Kees P D
Schrier, Ernst
Dijkstra, Pieter U
Krabbe, Paul F M
Patients First: Toward a Patient-Centered Instrument to Measure Impact of Chronic Pain
title Patients First: Toward a Patient-Centered Instrument to Measure Impact of Chronic Pain
title_full Patients First: Toward a Patient-Centered Instrument to Measure Impact of Chronic Pain
title_fullStr Patients First: Toward a Patient-Centered Instrument to Measure Impact of Chronic Pain
title_full_unstemmed Patients First: Toward a Patient-Centered Instrument to Measure Impact of Chronic Pain
title_short Patients First: Toward a Patient-Centered Instrument to Measure Impact of Chronic Pain
title_sort patients first: toward a patient-centered instrument to measure impact of chronic pain
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6181955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29939365
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzy040
work_keys_str_mv AT renemanmichielf patientsfirsttowardapatientcenteredinstrumenttomeasureimpactofchronicpain
AT brandsemakeespd patientsfirsttowardapatientcenteredinstrumenttomeasureimpactofchronicpain
AT schrierernst patientsfirsttowardapatientcenteredinstrumenttomeasureimpactofchronicpain
AT dijkstrapieteru patientsfirsttowardapatientcenteredinstrumenttomeasureimpactofchronicpain
AT krabbepaulfm patientsfirsttowardapatientcenteredinstrumenttomeasureimpactofchronicpain