Cargando…

Radiation exposure of adrenal vein sampling: a German Multicenter Study

OBJECTIVE: Adrenal vein sampling (AVS) represents the current diagnostic standard for subtype differentiation in primary aldosteronism (PA). However, AVS has its drawbacks. It is invasive, expensive, requires an experienced interventional radiologist and comes with radiation exposure. However, exact...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fuss, C T, Treitl, M, Rayes, N, Podrabsky, P, Fenske, W K, Heinrich, D A, Reincke, M, Petersen, T-O, Fassnacht, M, Quinkler, M, Kickuth, R, Hahner, S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bioscientifica Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6182189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30299899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/EJE-18-0328
_version_ 1783362509923680256
author Fuss, C T
Treitl, M
Rayes, N
Podrabsky, P
Fenske, W K
Heinrich, D A
Reincke, M
Petersen, T-O
Fassnacht, M
Quinkler, M
Kickuth, R
Hahner, S
author_facet Fuss, C T
Treitl, M
Rayes, N
Podrabsky, P
Fenske, W K
Heinrich, D A
Reincke, M
Petersen, T-O
Fassnacht, M
Quinkler, M
Kickuth, R
Hahner, S
author_sort Fuss, C T
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Adrenal vein sampling (AVS) represents the current diagnostic standard for subtype differentiation in primary aldosteronism (PA). However, AVS has its drawbacks. It is invasive, expensive, requires an experienced interventional radiologist and comes with radiation exposure. However, exact radiation exposure of patients undergoing AVS has never been examined. DESIGN AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed radiation exposure of 656 AVS performed between 1999 and 2017 at four university hospitals. The primary outcomes were dose area product (DAP) and fluoroscopy time (FT). Consecutively the effective dose (ED) was approximately calculated. RESULTS: Median DAP was found to be 32.5 Gy*cm(2) (0.3–3181) and FT 18 min (0.3–184). The calculated ED was 6.4 mSv (0.1–636). Remarkably, values between participating centers highly varied: Median DAP ranged from 16 to 147 Gy*cm(2), FT from 16 to 27 min, and ED from 3.2 to 29 mSv. As main reason for this variation, differences regarding AVS protocols between centers could be identified, such as number of sampling locations, frames per second and the use of digital subtraction angiographies. CONCLUSION: This first systematic assessment of radiation exposure in AVS not only shows fairly high values for patients, but also states notable differences among the centers. Thus, we not only recommend taking into account the risk of radiation exposure, when referring patients to undergo AVS, but also to establish improved standard operating procedures to prevent unnecessary radiation exposure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6182189
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Bioscientifica Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61821892018-10-18 Radiation exposure of adrenal vein sampling: a German Multicenter Study Fuss, C T Treitl, M Rayes, N Podrabsky, P Fenske, W K Heinrich, D A Reincke, M Petersen, T-O Fassnacht, M Quinkler, M Kickuth, R Hahner, S Eur J Endocrinol Clinical Study OBJECTIVE: Adrenal vein sampling (AVS) represents the current diagnostic standard for subtype differentiation in primary aldosteronism (PA). However, AVS has its drawbacks. It is invasive, expensive, requires an experienced interventional radiologist and comes with radiation exposure. However, exact radiation exposure of patients undergoing AVS has never been examined. DESIGN AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed radiation exposure of 656 AVS performed between 1999 and 2017 at four university hospitals. The primary outcomes were dose area product (DAP) and fluoroscopy time (FT). Consecutively the effective dose (ED) was approximately calculated. RESULTS: Median DAP was found to be 32.5 Gy*cm(2) (0.3–3181) and FT 18 min (0.3–184). The calculated ED was 6.4 mSv (0.1–636). Remarkably, values between participating centers highly varied: Median DAP ranged from 16 to 147 Gy*cm(2), FT from 16 to 27 min, and ED from 3.2 to 29 mSv. As main reason for this variation, differences regarding AVS protocols between centers could be identified, such as number of sampling locations, frames per second and the use of digital subtraction angiographies. CONCLUSION: This first systematic assessment of radiation exposure in AVS not only shows fairly high values for patients, but also states notable differences among the centers. Thus, we not only recommend taking into account the risk of radiation exposure, when referring patients to undergo AVS, but also to establish improved standard operating procedures to prevent unnecessary radiation exposure. Bioscientifica Ltd 2018-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6182189/ /pubmed/30299899 http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/EJE-18-0328 Text en © 2018 The authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Fuss, C T
Treitl, M
Rayes, N
Podrabsky, P
Fenske, W K
Heinrich, D A
Reincke, M
Petersen, T-O
Fassnacht, M
Quinkler, M
Kickuth, R
Hahner, S
Radiation exposure of adrenal vein sampling: a German Multicenter Study
title Radiation exposure of adrenal vein sampling: a German Multicenter Study
title_full Radiation exposure of adrenal vein sampling: a German Multicenter Study
title_fullStr Radiation exposure of adrenal vein sampling: a German Multicenter Study
title_full_unstemmed Radiation exposure of adrenal vein sampling: a German Multicenter Study
title_short Radiation exposure of adrenal vein sampling: a German Multicenter Study
title_sort radiation exposure of adrenal vein sampling: a german multicenter study
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6182189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30299899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/EJE-18-0328
work_keys_str_mv AT fussct radiationexposureofadrenalveinsamplingagermanmulticenterstudy
AT treitlm radiationexposureofadrenalveinsamplingagermanmulticenterstudy
AT rayesn radiationexposureofadrenalveinsamplingagermanmulticenterstudy
AT podrabskyp radiationexposureofadrenalveinsamplingagermanmulticenterstudy
AT fenskewk radiationexposureofadrenalveinsamplingagermanmulticenterstudy
AT heinrichda radiationexposureofadrenalveinsamplingagermanmulticenterstudy
AT reinckem radiationexposureofadrenalveinsamplingagermanmulticenterstudy
AT petersento radiationexposureofadrenalveinsamplingagermanmulticenterstudy
AT fassnachtm radiationexposureofadrenalveinsamplingagermanmulticenterstudy
AT quinklerm radiationexposureofadrenalveinsamplingagermanmulticenterstudy
AT kickuthr radiationexposureofadrenalveinsamplingagermanmulticenterstudy
AT hahners radiationexposureofadrenalveinsamplingagermanmulticenterstudy