Cargando…
A randomised trial of observational learning from 2D and 3D models in robotically assisted surgery
BACKGROUND: Advances in 3D technology mean that both robotic surgical devices and surgical simulators can now incorporate stereoscopic viewing capabilities. While depth information may benefit robotic surgical performance, it is unclear whether 3D viewing also aids skill acquisition when learning fr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6182323/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29761273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6203-3 |
_version_ | 1783362537084944384 |
---|---|
author | Harris, David J. Vine, Samuel J. Wilson, Mark R. McGrath, John S. LeBel, Marie-Eve Buckingham, Gavin |
author_facet | Harris, David J. Vine, Samuel J. Wilson, Mark R. McGrath, John S. LeBel, Marie-Eve Buckingham, Gavin |
author_sort | Harris, David J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Advances in 3D technology mean that both robotic surgical devices and surgical simulators can now incorporate stereoscopic viewing capabilities. While depth information may benefit robotic surgical performance, it is unclear whether 3D viewing also aids skill acquisition when learning from observing others. As observational learning plays a major role in surgical skills training, this study aimed to evaluate whether 3D viewing provides learning benefits in a robotically assisted surgical task. METHODS: 90 medical students were assigned to either (1) 2D or (2) 3D observation of a consultant surgeon performing a training task on the daVinci S robotic system, or (3) a no observation control, in a randomised parallel design. Subsequent performance and instrument movement metrics were assessed immediately following observation and at one-week retention. RESULTS: Both 2D and 3D groups outperformed no observation controls following the observation intervention (ps < 0.05), but there was no difference between 2D and 3D groups at any of the timepoints. There was also no difference in movement parameters between groups. CONCLUSIONS: While 3D viewing systems may have beneficial effects for surgical performance, these results suggest that depth information has limited utility during observational learning of surgical skills in novices. The task constraints and end goals may provide more important information for learning than the relative motion of surgical instruments in 3D space. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6182323 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61823232018-10-22 A randomised trial of observational learning from 2D and 3D models in robotically assisted surgery Harris, David J. Vine, Samuel J. Wilson, Mark R. McGrath, John S. LeBel, Marie-Eve Buckingham, Gavin Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUND: Advances in 3D technology mean that both robotic surgical devices and surgical simulators can now incorporate stereoscopic viewing capabilities. While depth information may benefit robotic surgical performance, it is unclear whether 3D viewing also aids skill acquisition when learning from observing others. As observational learning plays a major role in surgical skills training, this study aimed to evaluate whether 3D viewing provides learning benefits in a robotically assisted surgical task. METHODS: 90 medical students were assigned to either (1) 2D or (2) 3D observation of a consultant surgeon performing a training task on the daVinci S robotic system, or (3) a no observation control, in a randomised parallel design. Subsequent performance and instrument movement metrics were assessed immediately following observation and at one-week retention. RESULTS: Both 2D and 3D groups outperformed no observation controls following the observation intervention (ps < 0.05), but there was no difference between 2D and 3D groups at any of the timepoints. There was also no difference in movement parameters between groups. CONCLUSIONS: While 3D viewing systems may have beneficial effects for surgical performance, these results suggest that depth information has limited utility during observational learning of surgical skills in novices. The task constraints and end goals may provide more important information for learning than the relative motion of surgical instruments in 3D space. Springer US 2018-05-14 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6182323/ /pubmed/29761273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6203-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Harris, David J. Vine, Samuel J. Wilson, Mark R. McGrath, John S. LeBel, Marie-Eve Buckingham, Gavin A randomised trial of observational learning from 2D and 3D models in robotically assisted surgery |
title | A randomised trial of observational learning from 2D and 3D models in robotically assisted surgery |
title_full | A randomised trial of observational learning from 2D and 3D models in robotically assisted surgery |
title_fullStr | A randomised trial of observational learning from 2D and 3D models in robotically assisted surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | A randomised trial of observational learning from 2D and 3D models in robotically assisted surgery |
title_short | A randomised trial of observational learning from 2D and 3D models in robotically assisted surgery |
title_sort | randomised trial of observational learning from 2d and 3d models in robotically assisted surgery |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6182323/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29761273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6203-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT harrisdavidj arandomisedtrialofobservationallearningfrom2dand3dmodelsinroboticallyassistedsurgery AT vinesamuelj arandomisedtrialofobservationallearningfrom2dand3dmodelsinroboticallyassistedsurgery AT wilsonmarkr arandomisedtrialofobservationallearningfrom2dand3dmodelsinroboticallyassistedsurgery AT mcgrathjohns arandomisedtrialofobservationallearningfrom2dand3dmodelsinroboticallyassistedsurgery AT lebelmarieeve arandomisedtrialofobservationallearningfrom2dand3dmodelsinroboticallyassistedsurgery AT buckinghamgavin arandomisedtrialofobservationallearningfrom2dand3dmodelsinroboticallyassistedsurgery AT harrisdavidj randomisedtrialofobservationallearningfrom2dand3dmodelsinroboticallyassistedsurgery AT vinesamuelj randomisedtrialofobservationallearningfrom2dand3dmodelsinroboticallyassistedsurgery AT wilsonmarkr randomisedtrialofobservationallearningfrom2dand3dmodelsinroboticallyassistedsurgery AT mcgrathjohns randomisedtrialofobservationallearningfrom2dand3dmodelsinroboticallyassistedsurgery AT lebelmarieeve randomisedtrialofobservationallearningfrom2dand3dmodelsinroboticallyassistedsurgery AT buckinghamgavin randomisedtrialofobservationallearningfrom2dand3dmodelsinroboticallyassistedsurgery |