Cargando…

A randomised trial of observational learning from 2D and 3D models in robotically assisted surgery

BACKGROUND: Advances in 3D technology mean that both robotic surgical devices and surgical simulators can now incorporate stereoscopic viewing capabilities. While depth information may benefit robotic surgical performance, it is unclear whether 3D viewing also aids skill acquisition when learning fr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harris, David J., Vine, Samuel J., Wilson, Mark R., McGrath, John S., LeBel, Marie-Eve, Buckingham, Gavin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6182323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29761273
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6203-3
_version_ 1783362537084944384
author Harris, David J.
Vine, Samuel J.
Wilson, Mark R.
McGrath, John S.
LeBel, Marie-Eve
Buckingham, Gavin
author_facet Harris, David J.
Vine, Samuel J.
Wilson, Mark R.
McGrath, John S.
LeBel, Marie-Eve
Buckingham, Gavin
author_sort Harris, David J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Advances in 3D technology mean that both robotic surgical devices and surgical simulators can now incorporate stereoscopic viewing capabilities. While depth information may benefit robotic surgical performance, it is unclear whether 3D viewing also aids skill acquisition when learning from observing others. As observational learning plays a major role in surgical skills training, this study aimed to evaluate whether 3D viewing provides learning benefits in a robotically assisted surgical task. METHODS: 90 medical students were assigned to either (1) 2D or (2) 3D observation of a consultant surgeon performing a training task on the daVinci S robotic system, or (3) a no observation control, in a randomised parallel design. Subsequent performance and instrument movement metrics were assessed immediately following observation and at one-week retention. RESULTS: Both 2D and 3D groups outperformed no observation controls following the observation intervention (ps < 0.05), but there was no difference between 2D and 3D groups at any of the timepoints. There was also no difference in movement parameters between groups. CONCLUSIONS: While 3D viewing systems may have beneficial effects for surgical performance, these results suggest that depth information has limited utility during observational learning of surgical skills in novices. The task constraints and end goals may provide more important information for learning than the relative motion of surgical instruments in 3D space.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6182323
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61823232018-10-22 A randomised trial of observational learning from 2D and 3D models in robotically assisted surgery Harris, David J. Vine, Samuel J. Wilson, Mark R. McGrath, John S. LeBel, Marie-Eve Buckingham, Gavin Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUND: Advances in 3D technology mean that both robotic surgical devices and surgical simulators can now incorporate stereoscopic viewing capabilities. While depth information may benefit robotic surgical performance, it is unclear whether 3D viewing also aids skill acquisition when learning from observing others. As observational learning plays a major role in surgical skills training, this study aimed to evaluate whether 3D viewing provides learning benefits in a robotically assisted surgical task. METHODS: 90 medical students were assigned to either (1) 2D or (2) 3D observation of a consultant surgeon performing a training task on the daVinci S robotic system, or (3) a no observation control, in a randomised parallel design. Subsequent performance and instrument movement metrics were assessed immediately following observation and at one-week retention. RESULTS: Both 2D and 3D groups outperformed no observation controls following the observation intervention (ps < 0.05), but there was no difference between 2D and 3D groups at any of the timepoints. There was also no difference in movement parameters between groups. CONCLUSIONS: While 3D viewing systems may have beneficial effects for surgical performance, these results suggest that depth information has limited utility during observational learning of surgical skills in novices. The task constraints and end goals may provide more important information for learning than the relative motion of surgical instruments in 3D space. Springer US 2018-05-14 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6182323/ /pubmed/29761273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6203-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Harris, David J.
Vine, Samuel J.
Wilson, Mark R.
McGrath, John S.
LeBel, Marie-Eve
Buckingham, Gavin
A randomised trial of observational learning from 2D and 3D models in robotically assisted surgery
title A randomised trial of observational learning from 2D and 3D models in robotically assisted surgery
title_full A randomised trial of observational learning from 2D and 3D models in robotically assisted surgery
title_fullStr A randomised trial of observational learning from 2D and 3D models in robotically assisted surgery
title_full_unstemmed A randomised trial of observational learning from 2D and 3D models in robotically assisted surgery
title_short A randomised trial of observational learning from 2D and 3D models in robotically assisted surgery
title_sort randomised trial of observational learning from 2d and 3d models in robotically assisted surgery
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6182323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29761273
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6203-3
work_keys_str_mv AT harrisdavidj arandomisedtrialofobservationallearningfrom2dand3dmodelsinroboticallyassistedsurgery
AT vinesamuelj arandomisedtrialofobservationallearningfrom2dand3dmodelsinroboticallyassistedsurgery
AT wilsonmarkr arandomisedtrialofobservationallearningfrom2dand3dmodelsinroboticallyassistedsurgery
AT mcgrathjohns arandomisedtrialofobservationallearningfrom2dand3dmodelsinroboticallyassistedsurgery
AT lebelmarieeve arandomisedtrialofobservationallearningfrom2dand3dmodelsinroboticallyassistedsurgery
AT buckinghamgavin arandomisedtrialofobservationallearningfrom2dand3dmodelsinroboticallyassistedsurgery
AT harrisdavidj randomisedtrialofobservationallearningfrom2dand3dmodelsinroboticallyassistedsurgery
AT vinesamuelj randomisedtrialofobservationallearningfrom2dand3dmodelsinroboticallyassistedsurgery
AT wilsonmarkr randomisedtrialofobservationallearningfrom2dand3dmodelsinroboticallyassistedsurgery
AT mcgrathjohns randomisedtrialofobservationallearningfrom2dand3dmodelsinroboticallyassistedsurgery
AT lebelmarieeve randomisedtrialofobservationallearningfrom2dand3dmodelsinroboticallyassistedsurgery
AT buckinghamgavin randomisedtrialofobservationallearningfrom2dand3dmodelsinroboticallyassistedsurgery