Cargando…
Validation of the Oncomine(™) focus panel for next-generation sequencing of clinical tumour samples
The clinical utility of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for a diverse range of targets is expanding, increasing the need for multiplexed analysis of both DNA and RNA. However, translation into daily use requires a rigorous and comprehensive validation strategy. The aim of this clinical validation w...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6182325/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30105577 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-018-2411-4 |
_version_ | 1783362537310388224 |
---|---|
author | Williams, Hannah L. Walsh, Kathy Diamond, Austin Oniscu, Anca Deans, Zandra C. |
author_facet | Williams, Hannah L. Walsh, Kathy Diamond, Austin Oniscu, Anca Deans, Zandra C. |
author_sort | Williams, Hannah L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The clinical utility of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for a diverse range of targets is expanding, increasing the need for multiplexed analysis of both DNA and RNA. However, translation into daily use requires a rigorous and comprehensive validation strategy. The aim of this clinical validation was to assess the performance of the Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine (IonPGM(™)) and validate the Oncomine(™) Focus DNA and RNA Fusion panels for clinical application in solid tumour testing of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue. Using a mixture of routine FFPE and reference material across a variety of tissue and specimen types, we sequenced 86 and 31 samples on the Oncomine(™) Focus DNA and RNA Fusion assays, respectively. This validation considered a number of parameters including the clinical robustness of the bioinformatics pipeline for variant detection and interpretation. The Oncomine(™) Focus DNA assay had a sample and variant-based sensitivity of 99.1 and 97.1%, respectively, and an assay specificity of 100%. The Oncomine(™) Focus Fusion panel had a good sensitivity and specificity based upon the samples assessed, however requires further validation to confirm findings due to limited sample numbers. We observed a good sequencing performance based upon amplicon, gene (hotspot variants within gene) and sample specific analysis with 92% of clinical samples obtaining an average amplicon coverage above 500X. Detection of some indels was challenging for the routine IonReporter(™) workflow; however, the addition of NextGENe® software improved indel identification demonstrating the importance of both bench and bioinformatic validation. With an increasing number of clinically actionable targets requiring a variety of methodologies, NGS provides a cost-effective and time-saving methodology to assess multiple targets across different modalities. We suggest the use of multiple analysis software to ensure identification of clinically applicable variants. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00428-018-2411-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6182325 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61823252018-10-22 Validation of the Oncomine(™) focus panel for next-generation sequencing of clinical tumour samples Williams, Hannah L. Walsh, Kathy Diamond, Austin Oniscu, Anca Deans, Zandra C. Virchows Arch Original Article The clinical utility of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for a diverse range of targets is expanding, increasing the need for multiplexed analysis of both DNA and RNA. However, translation into daily use requires a rigorous and comprehensive validation strategy. The aim of this clinical validation was to assess the performance of the Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine (IonPGM(™)) and validate the Oncomine(™) Focus DNA and RNA Fusion panels for clinical application in solid tumour testing of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue. Using a mixture of routine FFPE and reference material across a variety of tissue and specimen types, we sequenced 86 and 31 samples on the Oncomine(™) Focus DNA and RNA Fusion assays, respectively. This validation considered a number of parameters including the clinical robustness of the bioinformatics pipeline for variant detection and interpretation. The Oncomine(™) Focus DNA assay had a sample and variant-based sensitivity of 99.1 and 97.1%, respectively, and an assay specificity of 100%. The Oncomine(™) Focus Fusion panel had a good sensitivity and specificity based upon the samples assessed, however requires further validation to confirm findings due to limited sample numbers. We observed a good sequencing performance based upon amplicon, gene (hotspot variants within gene) and sample specific analysis with 92% of clinical samples obtaining an average amplicon coverage above 500X. Detection of some indels was challenging for the routine IonReporter(™) workflow; however, the addition of NextGENe® software improved indel identification demonstrating the importance of both bench and bioinformatic validation. With an increasing number of clinically actionable targets requiring a variety of methodologies, NGS provides a cost-effective and time-saving methodology to assess multiple targets across different modalities. We suggest the use of multiple analysis software to ensure identification of clinically applicable variants. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00428-018-2411-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-08-13 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6182325/ /pubmed/30105577 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-018-2411-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Williams, Hannah L. Walsh, Kathy Diamond, Austin Oniscu, Anca Deans, Zandra C. Validation of the Oncomine(™) focus panel for next-generation sequencing of clinical tumour samples |
title | Validation of the Oncomine(™) focus panel for next-generation sequencing of clinical tumour samples |
title_full | Validation of the Oncomine(™) focus panel for next-generation sequencing of clinical tumour samples |
title_fullStr | Validation of the Oncomine(™) focus panel for next-generation sequencing of clinical tumour samples |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of the Oncomine(™) focus panel for next-generation sequencing of clinical tumour samples |
title_short | Validation of the Oncomine(™) focus panel for next-generation sequencing of clinical tumour samples |
title_sort | validation of the oncomine(™) focus panel for next-generation sequencing of clinical tumour samples |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6182325/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30105577 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-018-2411-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT williamshannahl validationoftheoncominefocuspanelfornextgenerationsequencingofclinicaltumoursamples AT walshkathy validationoftheoncominefocuspanelfornextgenerationsequencingofclinicaltumoursamples AT diamondaustin validationoftheoncominefocuspanelfornextgenerationsequencingofclinicaltumoursamples AT oniscuanca validationoftheoncominefocuspanelfornextgenerationsequencingofclinicaltumoursamples AT deanszandrac validationoftheoncominefocuspanelfornextgenerationsequencingofclinicaltumoursamples |