Cargando…
Do drugs offering only PFS maintain quality of life sufficiently from a patient’s perspective? Results from AVALPROFS (Assessing the ‘VALue’ to patients of PROgression Free Survival) study
PURPOSE: Trials of novel drugs used in advanced disease often show only progression-free survival or modest overall survival benefits. Hypothetical studies suggest that stabilisation of metastatic disease and/or symptom burden are worth treatment-related side effects. We examined this premise contem...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6182366/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29845422 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4273-3 |
_version_ | 1783362546600771584 |
---|---|
author | Jenkins, V. Farewell, V. May, S. Catt, S. Matthews, L. Shilling, V. Dickson, J. Simcock, R. Fallowfield, L. |
author_facet | Jenkins, V. Farewell, V. May, S. Catt, S. Matthews, L. Shilling, V. Dickson, J. Simcock, R. Fallowfield, L. |
author_sort | Jenkins, V. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Trials of novel drugs used in advanced disease often show only progression-free survival or modest overall survival benefits. Hypothetical studies suggest that stabilisation of metastatic disease and/or symptom burden are worth treatment-related side effects. We examined this premise contemporaneously using qualitative and quantitative methods. METHODS: Patients with metastatic cancers expected to live > 6 months and prescribed drugs aimed at cancer control were interviewed: at baseline, at 6 weeks, at progression, and if treatment was stopped for toxicity. They also completed Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT-G) plus Anti-Angiogenesis (AA) subscale questionnaires at baseline then monthly for 6 months. RESULTS: Ninety out of 120 (75%) eligible patients participated: 41 (45%) remained on study for 6 months, 36 progressed or died, 4 had treatment breaks, and 9 withdrew due to toxicity. By 6 weeks, 66/69 (96%) patients were experiencing side effects which impacted their activities. Low QoL scores at baseline did not predict a higher risk of death or dropout. At 6-week interviews, as the side effect severity increased, patients were significantly less inclined to view the benefit of cancer control as worthwhile (X(2) = 50.7, P < 0.001). Emotional well-being initially improved from baseline by 10 weeks, then gradually returned to baseline levels. CONCLUSION: Maintaining QoL is vital to most patients with advanced cancer so minimising treatment-related side effects is essential. As side effect severity increased, drugs that controlled cancer for short periods were not viewed as worthwhile. Patients need to have the therapeutic aims of further anti-cancer treatment explained honestly and sensitively. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00520-018-4273-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6182366 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61823662018-10-22 Do drugs offering only PFS maintain quality of life sufficiently from a patient’s perspective? Results from AVALPROFS (Assessing the ‘VALue’ to patients of PROgression Free Survival) study Jenkins, V. Farewell, V. May, S. Catt, S. Matthews, L. Shilling, V. Dickson, J. Simcock, R. Fallowfield, L. Support Care Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: Trials of novel drugs used in advanced disease often show only progression-free survival or modest overall survival benefits. Hypothetical studies suggest that stabilisation of metastatic disease and/or symptom burden are worth treatment-related side effects. We examined this premise contemporaneously using qualitative and quantitative methods. METHODS: Patients with metastatic cancers expected to live > 6 months and prescribed drugs aimed at cancer control were interviewed: at baseline, at 6 weeks, at progression, and if treatment was stopped for toxicity. They also completed Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT-G) plus Anti-Angiogenesis (AA) subscale questionnaires at baseline then monthly for 6 months. RESULTS: Ninety out of 120 (75%) eligible patients participated: 41 (45%) remained on study for 6 months, 36 progressed or died, 4 had treatment breaks, and 9 withdrew due to toxicity. By 6 weeks, 66/69 (96%) patients were experiencing side effects which impacted their activities. Low QoL scores at baseline did not predict a higher risk of death or dropout. At 6-week interviews, as the side effect severity increased, patients were significantly less inclined to view the benefit of cancer control as worthwhile (X(2) = 50.7, P < 0.001). Emotional well-being initially improved from baseline by 10 weeks, then gradually returned to baseline levels. CONCLUSION: Maintaining QoL is vital to most patients with advanced cancer so minimising treatment-related side effects is essential. As side effect severity increased, drugs that controlled cancer for short periods were not viewed as worthwhile. Patients need to have the therapeutic aims of further anti-cancer treatment explained honestly and sensitively. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00520-018-4273-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-05-29 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6182366/ /pubmed/29845422 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4273-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Jenkins, V. Farewell, V. May, S. Catt, S. Matthews, L. Shilling, V. Dickson, J. Simcock, R. Fallowfield, L. Do drugs offering only PFS maintain quality of life sufficiently from a patient’s perspective? Results from AVALPROFS (Assessing the ‘VALue’ to patients of PROgression Free Survival) study |
title | Do drugs offering only PFS maintain quality of life sufficiently from a patient’s perspective? Results from AVALPROFS (Assessing the ‘VALue’ to patients of PROgression Free Survival) study |
title_full | Do drugs offering only PFS maintain quality of life sufficiently from a patient’s perspective? Results from AVALPROFS (Assessing the ‘VALue’ to patients of PROgression Free Survival) study |
title_fullStr | Do drugs offering only PFS maintain quality of life sufficiently from a patient’s perspective? Results from AVALPROFS (Assessing the ‘VALue’ to patients of PROgression Free Survival) study |
title_full_unstemmed | Do drugs offering only PFS maintain quality of life sufficiently from a patient’s perspective? Results from AVALPROFS (Assessing the ‘VALue’ to patients of PROgression Free Survival) study |
title_short | Do drugs offering only PFS maintain quality of life sufficiently from a patient’s perspective? Results from AVALPROFS (Assessing the ‘VALue’ to patients of PROgression Free Survival) study |
title_sort | do drugs offering only pfs maintain quality of life sufficiently from a patient’s perspective? results from avalprofs (assessing the ‘value’ to patients of progression free survival) study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6182366/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29845422 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4273-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jenkinsv dodrugsofferingonlypfsmaintainqualityoflifesufficientlyfromapatientsperspectiveresultsfromavalprofsassessingthevaluetopatientsofprogressionfreesurvivalstudy AT farewellv dodrugsofferingonlypfsmaintainqualityoflifesufficientlyfromapatientsperspectiveresultsfromavalprofsassessingthevaluetopatientsofprogressionfreesurvivalstudy AT mays dodrugsofferingonlypfsmaintainqualityoflifesufficientlyfromapatientsperspectiveresultsfromavalprofsassessingthevaluetopatientsofprogressionfreesurvivalstudy AT catts dodrugsofferingonlypfsmaintainqualityoflifesufficientlyfromapatientsperspectiveresultsfromavalprofsassessingthevaluetopatientsofprogressionfreesurvivalstudy AT matthewsl dodrugsofferingonlypfsmaintainqualityoflifesufficientlyfromapatientsperspectiveresultsfromavalprofsassessingthevaluetopatientsofprogressionfreesurvivalstudy AT shillingv dodrugsofferingonlypfsmaintainqualityoflifesufficientlyfromapatientsperspectiveresultsfromavalprofsassessingthevaluetopatientsofprogressionfreesurvivalstudy AT dicksonj dodrugsofferingonlypfsmaintainqualityoflifesufficientlyfromapatientsperspectiveresultsfromavalprofsassessingthevaluetopatientsofprogressionfreesurvivalstudy AT simcockr dodrugsofferingonlypfsmaintainqualityoflifesufficientlyfromapatientsperspectiveresultsfromavalprofsassessingthevaluetopatientsofprogressionfreesurvivalstudy AT fallowfieldl dodrugsofferingonlypfsmaintainqualityoflifesufficientlyfromapatientsperspectiveresultsfromavalprofsassessingthevaluetopatientsofprogressionfreesurvivalstudy |