Cargando…
Accurate Coil Positioning is Important for Single and Paired Pulse TMS on the Subject Level
Function-guided navigation is commonly used when assessing cortical excitability using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). However, the required accuracy, stability and the effect of a change in coil positioning are not entirely known. This study investigates the accuracy of function-guided nav...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6182440/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29943242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10548-018-0655-6 |
_version_ | 1783362564512546816 |
---|---|
author | de Goede, Annika A. ter Braack, Esther M. van Putten, Michel J. A. M. |
author_facet | de Goede, Annika A. ter Braack, Esther M. van Putten, Michel J. A. M. |
author_sort | de Goede, Annika A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Function-guided navigation is commonly used when assessing cortical excitability using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). However, the required accuracy, stability and the effect of a change in coil positioning are not entirely known. This study investigates the accuracy of function-guided navigation for determining the hotspot. Furthermore, it evaluates the effect of a change in coil location on the single and paired pulse excitability measures: motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude, TMS evoked potential (TEP) and long intracortical inhibition (LICI), and of a change in coil orientation on LICI. Eight healthy subjects participated in the single pulse study, and ten in the paired pulse study. A robot-guided navigation system was used to ensure accurate and stable coil positioning at the motor hotspot as determined using function-guided navigation. In addition, we targeted four locations at 2 mm and four at 5 mm distance around the initially defined hotspot, and we increased and decreased the coil orientation by 10°. In none of the subjects, the largest MEP amplitudes were evoked at the originally determined hotspot, resulting in a poor accuracy of function-guided navigation. At the group level, a change in coil location had no significant effect on the MEP amplitude, TEP, or LICI, and a change in coil orientation did not significantly affected LICI. However, at the subject level significant effects on MEP amplitude, TEP, and LICI were found for changes in coil location or orientation, although absolute differences were relatively small and did not show a consistent pattern. This study indicates that a high accuracy in coil positioning is especially required to measure cortical excitability reliably in individual subjects using single or paired pulse TMS. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10548-018-0655-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6182440 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61824402018-10-22 Accurate Coil Positioning is Important for Single and Paired Pulse TMS on the Subject Level de Goede, Annika A. ter Braack, Esther M. van Putten, Michel J. A. M. Brain Topogr Original Paper Function-guided navigation is commonly used when assessing cortical excitability using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). However, the required accuracy, stability and the effect of a change in coil positioning are not entirely known. This study investigates the accuracy of function-guided navigation for determining the hotspot. Furthermore, it evaluates the effect of a change in coil location on the single and paired pulse excitability measures: motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude, TMS evoked potential (TEP) and long intracortical inhibition (LICI), and of a change in coil orientation on LICI. Eight healthy subjects participated in the single pulse study, and ten in the paired pulse study. A robot-guided navigation system was used to ensure accurate and stable coil positioning at the motor hotspot as determined using function-guided navigation. In addition, we targeted four locations at 2 mm and four at 5 mm distance around the initially defined hotspot, and we increased and decreased the coil orientation by 10°. In none of the subjects, the largest MEP amplitudes were evoked at the originally determined hotspot, resulting in a poor accuracy of function-guided navigation. At the group level, a change in coil location had no significant effect on the MEP amplitude, TEP, or LICI, and a change in coil orientation did not significantly affected LICI. However, at the subject level significant effects on MEP amplitude, TEP, and LICI were found for changes in coil location or orientation, although absolute differences were relatively small and did not show a consistent pattern. This study indicates that a high accuracy in coil positioning is especially required to measure cortical excitability reliably in individual subjects using single or paired pulse TMS. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10548-018-0655-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2018-06-25 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6182440/ /pubmed/29943242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10548-018-0655-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper de Goede, Annika A. ter Braack, Esther M. van Putten, Michel J. A. M. Accurate Coil Positioning is Important for Single and Paired Pulse TMS on the Subject Level |
title | Accurate Coil Positioning is Important for Single and Paired Pulse TMS on the Subject Level |
title_full | Accurate Coil Positioning is Important for Single and Paired Pulse TMS on the Subject Level |
title_fullStr | Accurate Coil Positioning is Important for Single and Paired Pulse TMS on the Subject Level |
title_full_unstemmed | Accurate Coil Positioning is Important for Single and Paired Pulse TMS on the Subject Level |
title_short | Accurate Coil Positioning is Important for Single and Paired Pulse TMS on the Subject Level |
title_sort | accurate coil positioning is important for single and paired pulse tms on the subject level |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6182440/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29943242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10548-018-0655-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT degoedeannikaa accuratecoilpositioningisimportantforsingleandpairedpulsetmsonthesubjectlevel AT terbraackestherm accuratecoilpositioningisimportantforsingleandpairedpulsetmsonthesubjectlevel AT vanputtenmicheljam accuratecoilpositioningisimportantforsingleandpairedpulsetmsonthesubjectlevel |