Cargando…

Efficacy of Monotherapy with Biologics and JAK Inhibitors for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review

Despite recommendations suggesting that biological and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) should be used in combination with methotrexate in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), up to one-third of patients with RA are treated with monotherapy. The objective...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Emery, Paul, Pope, Janet E., Kruger, Klaus, Lippe, Ralph, DeMasi, Ryan, Lula, Sadiq, Kola, Blerina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6182623/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30128641
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-018-0757-2
_version_ 1783362608542253056
author Emery, Paul
Pope, Janet E.
Kruger, Klaus
Lippe, Ralph
DeMasi, Ryan
Lula, Sadiq
Kola, Blerina
author_facet Emery, Paul
Pope, Janet E.
Kruger, Klaus
Lippe, Ralph
DeMasi, Ryan
Lula, Sadiq
Kola, Blerina
author_sort Emery, Paul
collection PubMed
description Despite recommendations suggesting that biological and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) should be used in combination with methotrexate in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), up to one-third of patients with RA are treated with monotherapy. The objective of the systematic literature review reported here was to evaluate the clinical evidence regarding the efficacy of b/tsDMARDs as monotherapy in the treatment of RA. MEDLINE(®), Embase(®), and the Cochrane Central Trials Register (to April 11, 2017) and the American College of Rheumatology and European League Against Rheumatism conference proceedings (2010–2016) were searched for randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of b/tsDMARDs as monotherapy for RA in adults. Forty-four monotherapy studies of abatacept, adalimumab, baricitinib, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, sarilumab, sirukumab, tocilizumab, and tofacitinib reported in 71 publications were identified. Tocilizumab had the most studies (14), followed by etanercept (10) and adalimumab (9). These b/tsDMARDs were consistently shown to be efficacious treatments, regardless of whether patients were intolerant of or had never used conventional synthetic (cs) DMARDs. However, better treatment outcomes were usually achieved with combination therapy, and this was observed for all b/tsDMARDs assessed by this review. Only a few studies provided a head-to-head comparison between b/tsDMARD treatments or between b/tsDMARD monotherapy and combination therapy, and as many were initial RA treatments they were not generalizable to usual care. In conclusion, evidence from randomized trials suggests that the b/tsDMARDs studied are effective as monotherapy. In general, some patient responses seem better with combination therapy and the durability of monotherapy is less than combination therapy. There is, however, a need for longer-term head-to-head trials to establish positioning of these interventions in the treatment algorithm for RA. Funding: Pfizer. Plain Language Summary: Plain language summary available on the journal website. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-018-0757-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6182623
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61826232018-10-24 Efficacy of Monotherapy with Biologics and JAK Inhibitors for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review Emery, Paul Pope, Janet E. Kruger, Klaus Lippe, Ralph DeMasi, Ryan Lula, Sadiq Kola, Blerina Adv Ther Review Despite recommendations suggesting that biological and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) should be used in combination with methotrexate in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), up to one-third of patients with RA are treated with monotherapy. The objective of the systematic literature review reported here was to evaluate the clinical evidence regarding the efficacy of b/tsDMARDs as monotherapy in the treatment of RA. MEDLINE(®), Embase(®), and the Cochrane Central Trials Register (to April 11, 2017) and the American College of Rheumatology and European League Against Rheumatism conference proceedings (2010–2016) were searched for randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of b/tsDMARDs as monotherapy for RA in adults. Forty-four monotherapy studies of abatacept, adalimumab, baricitinib, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, sarilumab, sirukumab, tocilizumab, and tofacitinib reported in 71 publications were identified. Tocilizumab had the most studies (14), followed by etanercept (10) and adalimumab (9). These b/tsDMARDs were consistently shown to be efficacious treatments, regardless of whether patients were intolerant of or had never used conventional synthetic (cs) DMARDs. However, better treatment outcomes were usually achieved with combination therapy, and this was observed for all b/tsDMARDs assessed by this review. Only a few studies provided a head-to-head comparison between b/tsDMARD treatments or between b/tsDMARD monotherapy and combination therapy, and as many were initial RA treatments they were not generalizable to usual care. In conclusion, evidence from randomized trials suggests that the b/tsDMARDs studied are effective as monotherapy. In general, some patient responses seem better with combination therapy and the durability of monotherapy is less than combination therapy. There is, however, a need for longer-term head-to-head trials to establish positioning of these interventions in the treatment algorithm for RA. Funding: Pfizer. Plain Language Summary: Plain language summary available on the journal website. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-018-0757-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2018-08-20 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6182623/ /pubmed/30128641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-018-0757-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
Emery, Paul
Pope, Janet E.
Kruger, Klaus
Lippe, Ralph
DeMasi, Ryan
Lula, Sadiq
Kola, Blerina
Efficacy of Monotherapy with Biologics and JAK Inhibitors for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review
title Efficacy of Monotherapy with Biologics and JAK Inhibitors for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review
title_full Efficacy of Monotherapy with Biologics and JAK Inhibitors for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Efficacy of Monotherapy with Biologics and JAK Inhibitors for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Monotherapy with Biologics and JAK Inhibitors for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review
title_short Efficacy of Monotherapy with Biologics and JAK Inhibitors for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review
title_sort efficacy of monotherapy with biologics and jak inhibitors for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6182623/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30128641
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-018-0757-2
work_keys_str_mv AT emerypaul efficacyofmonotherapywithbiologicsandjakinhibitorsforthetreatmentofrheumatoidarthritisasystematicreview
AT popejanete efficacyofmonotherapywithbiologicsandjakinhibitorsforthetreatmentofrheumatoidarthritisasystematicreview
AT krugerklaus efficacyofmonotherapywithbiologicsandjakinhibitorsforthetreatmentofrheumatoidarthritisasystematicreview
AT lipperalph efficacyofmonotherapywithbiologicsandjakinhibitorsforthetreatmentofrheumatoidarthritisasystematicreview
AT demasiryan efficacyofmonotherapywithbiologicsandjakinhibitorsforthetreatmentofrheumatoidarthritisasystematicreview
AT lulasadiq efficacyofmonotherapywithbiologicsandjakinhibitorsforthetreatmentofrheumatoidarthritisasystematicreview
AT kolablerina efficacyofmonotherapywithbiologicsandjakinhibitorsforthetreatmentofrheumatoidarthritisasystematicreview