Cargando…

Comparative Effectiveness of nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine vs FOLFIRINOX in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: A Retrospective Nationwide Chart Review in the United States

INTRODUCTION: nab-Paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (nab-P + G) and FOLFIRINOX (FFX) are among the most common first-line (1L) therapies for metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas (MPAC), but real-world data on their comparative effectiveness are limited. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study compar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Sunnie, Signorovitch, James E., Yang, Hongbo, Patterson-Lomba, Oscar, Xiang, Cheryl Q., Ung, Brian, Parisi, Monika, Marshall, John L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6182639/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30209750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-018-0784-z
_version_ 1783362612631699456
author Kim, Sunnie
Signorovitch, James E.
Yang, Hongbo
Patterson-Lomba, Oscar
Xiang, Cheryl Q.
Ung, Brian
Parisi, Monika
Marshall, John L.
author_facet Kim, Sunnie
Signorovitch, James E.
Yang, Hongbo
Patterson-Lomba, Oscar
Xiang, Cheryl Q.
Ung, Brian
Parisi, Monika
Marshall, John L.
author_sort Kim, Sunnie
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: nab-Paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (nab-P + G) and FOLFIRINOX (FFX) are among the most common first-line (1L) therapies for metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas (MPAC), but real-world data on their comparative effectiveness are limited. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study compared the efficacy and safety of 1L nab-P + G versus FFX, overall and under specific treatment sequences. Medical records were reviewed by 215 US physicians who provided information on MPAC patients who initiated 1L therapy with nab-P + G or FFX between April 1, 2015 and December 31, 2015. Study outcomes were overall survival (OS) and tolerability. OS was compared using Kaplan–Meier curves and adjusted Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: In total, 654 medical records were reviewed, including those of 337 and 317 patients initiated on nab-P + G and FFX as 1L MPAC therapy, respectively. nab-P + G-initiated patients were older, less likely to have ECOG ≤ 1, and had more comorbidities than FFX-initiated patients. Median OS (mOS) was 12.1 and 13.8 months for nab-P + G- and FFX-initiated patients, respectively (HR = 0.99, P = 0.96). Among patients with ECOG ≤ 1, mOS was 14.1 and 13.7 months, respectively (HR = 1.00, P = 0.99). Among patients with 1L nab-P + G and FFX, 36.1% and 41.3% received 2L therapy and experienced mOS of 16.3 and 16.6 months, respectively (HR = 1.04, P = 0.76). The rates of diarrhea, fatigue, mucositis, and nausea and vomiting were significantly higher in the FFX than nab-P + G cohort. CONCLUSION: The real-world survival was similar between patients receiving 1L nab-P + G or FFX both overall and among patients who received active 2L treatments. In addition, nab-P + G was associated with significantly lower rates of common AEs compared with FFX. FUNDING: Celgene. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-018-0784-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6182639
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61826392018-10-24 Comparative Effectiveness of nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine vs FOLFIRINOX in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: A Retrospective Nationwide Chart Review in the United States Kim, Sunnie Signorovitch, James E. Yang, Hongbo Patterson-Lomba, Oscar Xiang, Cheryl Q. Ung, Brian Parisi, Monika Marshall, John L. Adv Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: nab-Paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (nab-P + G) and FOLFIRINOX (FFX) are among the most common first-line (1L) therapies for metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas (MPAC), but real-world data on their comparative effectiveness are limited. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study compared the efficacy and safety of 1L nab-P + G versus FFX, overall and under specific treatment sequences. Medical records were reviewed by 215 US physicians who provided information on MPAC patients who initiated 1L therapy with nab-P + G or FFX between April 1, 2015 and December 31, 2015. Study outcomes were overall survival (OS) and tolerability. OS was compared using Kaplan–Meier curves and adjusted Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: In total, 654 medical records were reviewed, including those of 337 and 317 patients initiated on nab-P + G and FFX as 1L MPAC therapy, respectively. nab-P + G-initiated patients were older, less likely to have ECOG ≤ 1, and had more comorbidities than FFX-initiated patients. Median OS (mOS) was 12.1 and 13.8 months for nab-P + G- and FFX-initiated patients, respectively (HR = 0.99, P = 0.96). Among patients with ECOG ≤ 1, mOS was 14.1 and 13.7 months, respectively (HR = 1.00, P = 0.99). Among patients with 1L nab-P + G and FFX, 36.1% and 41.3% received 2L therapy and experienced mOS of 16.3 and 16.6 months, respectively (HR = 1.04, P = 0.76). The rates of diarrhea, fatigue, mucositis, and nausea and vomiting were significantly higher in the FFX than nab-P + G cohort. CONCLUSION: The real-world survival was similar between patients receiving 1L nab-P + G or FFX both overall and among patients who received active 2L treatments. In addition, nab-P + G was associated with significantly lower rates of common AEs compared with FFX. FUNDING: Celgene. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-018-0784-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2018-09-12 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6182639/ /pubmed/30209750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-018-0784-z Text en © The Author(s) 2018 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Kim, Sunnie
Signorovitch, James E.
Yang, Hongbo
Patterson-Lomba, Oscar
Xiang, Cheryl Q.
Ung, Brian
Parisi, Monika
Marshall, John L.
Comparative Effectiveness of nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine vs FOLFIRINOX in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: A Retrospective Nationwide Chart Review in the United States
title Comparative Effectiveness of nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine vs FOLFIRINOX in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: A Retrospective Nationwide Chart Review in the United States
title_full Comparative Effectiveness of nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine vs FOLFIRINOX in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: A Retrospective Nationwide Chart Review in the United States
title_fullStr Comparative Effectiveness of nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine vs FOLFIRINOX in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: A Retrospective Nationwide Chart Review in the United States
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Effectiveness of nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine vs FOLFIRINOX in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: A Retrospective Nationwide Chart Review in the United States
title_short Comparative Effectiveness of nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine vs FOLFIRINOX in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: A Retrospective Nationwide Chart Review in the United States
title_sort comparative effectiveness of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine vs folfirinox in metastatic pancreatic cancer: a retrospective nationwide chart review in the united states
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6182639/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30209750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-018-0784-z
work_keys_str_mv AT kimsunnie comparativeeffectivenessofnabpaclitaxelplusgemcitabinevsfolfirinoxinmetastaticpancreaticcanceraretrospectivenationwidechartreviewintheunitedstates
AT signorovitchjamese comparativeeffectivenessofnabpaclitaxelplusgemcitabinevsfolfirinoxinmetastaticpancreaticcanceraretrospectivenationwidechartreviewintheunitedstates
AT yanghongbo comparativeeffectivenessofnabpaclitaxelplusgemcitabinevsfolfirinoxinmetastaticpancreaticcanceraretrospectivenationwidechartreviewintheunitedstates
AT pattersonlombaoscar comparativeeffectivenessofnabpaclitaxelplusgemcitabinevsfolfirinoxinmetastaticpancreaticcanceraretrospectivenationwidechartreviewintheunitedstates
AT xiangcherylq comparativeeffectivenessofnabpaclitaxelplusgemcitabinevsfolfirinoxinmetastaticpancreaticcanceraretrospectivenationwidechartreviewintheunitedstates
AT ungbrian comparativeeffectivenessofnabpaclitaxelplusgemcitabinevsfolfirinoxinmetastaticpancreaticcanceraretrospectivenationwidechartreviewintheunitedstates
AT parisimonika comparativeeffectivenessofnabpaclitaxelplusgemcitabinevsfolfirinoxinmetastaticpancreaticcanceraretrospectivenationwidechartreviewintheunitedstates
AT marshalljohnl comparativeeffectivenessofnabpaclitaxelplusgemcitabinevsfolfirinoxinmetastaticpancreaticcanceraretrospectivenationwidechartreviewintheunitedstates