Cargando…

Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Father Engagement Questionnaire

While there has been increasing interest in promoting father engagement in parenting interventions for child wellbeing, both research and practice endeavors have been hindered by a lack of a measure of father engagement practices. This paper reports the development and evaluation of a comprehensive,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jiang, Yixin, Tully, Lucy A., Burn, Matthew T., Piotrowska, Patrycja, Collins, Daniel A. J., Moul, Caroline, Frick, Paul J., Hawes, David J., Kimonis, Eva R., Lenroot, Rhoshel K., Anderson, Vicki, Dadds, Mark R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6182713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30369777
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1195-0
_version_ 1783362629957320704
author Jiang, Yixin
Tully, Lucy A.
Burn, Matthew T.
Piotrowska, Patrycja
Collins, Daniel A. J.
Moul, Caroline
Frick, Paul J.
Hawes, David J.
Kimonis, Eva R.
Lenroot, Rhoshel K.
Anderson, Vicki
Dadds, Mark R.
author_facet Jiang, Yixin
Tully, Lucy A.
Burn, Matthew T.
Piotrowska, Patrycja
Collins, Daniel A. J.
Moul, Caroline
Frick, Paul J.
Hawes, David J.
Kimonis, Eva R.
Lenroot, Rhoshel K.
Anderson, Vicki
Dadds, Mark R.
author_sort Jiang, Yixin
collection PubMed
description While there has been increasing interest in promoting father engagement in parenting interventions for child wellbeing, both research and practice endeavors have been hindered by a lack of a measure of father engagement practices. This paper reports the development and evaluation of a comprehensive, practitioner-report measure of father engagement practices–—the Father Engagement Questionnaire (FEQ). Practitioners (N = 589; 84.5% females; mean age = 38.56) involved in delivering parenting interventions in Australia completed the FEQ, along with background demographics and questions regarding their own and organization’s practice. A separate sample of 28 practitioners completed the FEQ twice, with a two-week interim, to assess test–retest stability of the measure. Exploratory factor analysis revealed five factors corresponding to the measure’s five intended content areas: Confidence in Working with Fathers, Competence in Using Engagement Strategies, Perceived Effectiveness of Engagement Strategies, Frequency of Strategy Use, and Organizational Practices for Father Engagement. Each of these scales demonstrated adequate internal consistency reliability and test–retest stability. As the five scales appear to be related but distinct, it is recommended that the FEQ is used as a multidimensional measure of father engagement. In terms of predictive validity, higher scores on the Confidence in Working with Fathers, Frequency of Strategy Use, and Organizational Practices for Father Engagement scales were associated with a higher likelihood of practitioner-reported father attendance. The results provide support for adequate psychometric properties of the FEQ as a research and clinical tool for assessing and monitoring father engagement practices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6182713
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61827132018-10-24 Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Father Engagement Questionnaire Jiang, Yixin Tully, Lucy A. Burn, Matthew T. Piotrowska, Patrycja Collins, Daniel A. J. Moul, Caroline Frick, Paul J. Hawes, David J. Kimonis, Eva R. Lenroot, Rhoshel K. Anderson, Vicki Dadds, Mark R. J Child Fam Stud Original Paper While there has been increasing interest in promoting father engagement in parenting interventions for child wellbeing, both research and practice endeavors have been hindered by a lack of a measure of father engagement practices. This paper reports the development and evaluation of a comprehensive, practitioner-report measure of father engagement practices–—the Father Engagement Questionnaire (FEQ). Practitioners (N = 589; 84.5% females; mean age = 38.56) involved in delivering parenting interventions in Australia completed the FEQ, along with background demographics and questions regarding their own and organization’s practice. A separate sample of 28 practitioners completed the FEQ twice, with a two-week interim, to assess test–retest stability of the measure. Exploratory factor analysis revealed five factors corresponding to the measure’s five intended content areas: Confidence in Working with Fathers, Competence in Using Engagement Strategies, Perceived Effectiveness of Engagement Strategies, Frequency of Strategy Use, and Organizational Practices for Father Engagement. Each of these scales demonstrated adequate internal consistency reliability and test–retest stability. As the five scales appear to be related but distinct, it is recommended that the FEQ is used as a multidimensional measure of father engagement. In terms of predictive validity, higher scores on the Confidence in Working with Fathers, Frequency of Strategy Use, and Organizational Practices for Father Engagement scales were associated with a higher likelihood of practitioner-reported father attendance. The results provide support for adequate psychometric properties of the FEQ as a research and clinical tool for assessing and monitoring father engagement practices. Springer US 2018-07-20 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6182713/ /pubmed/30369777 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1195-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Jiang, Yixin
Tully, Lucy A.
Burn, Matthew T.
Piotrowska, Patrycja
Collins, Daniel A. J.
Moul, Caroline
Frick, Paul J.
Hawes, David J.
Kimonis, Eva R.
Lenroot, Rhoshel K.
Anderson, Vicki
Dadds, Mark R.
Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Father Engagement Questionnaire
title Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Father Engagement Questionnaire
title_full Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Father Engagement Questionnaire
title_fullStr Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Father Engagement Questionnaire
title_full_unstemmed Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Father Engagement Questionnaire
title_short Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Father Engagement Questionnaire
title_sort development and psychometric evaluation of the father engagement questionnaire
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6182713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30369777
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1195-0
work_keys_str_mv AT jiangyixin developmentandpsychometricevaluationofthefatherengagementquestionnaire
AT tullylucya developmentandpsychometricevaluationofthefatherengagementquestionnaire
AT burnmatthewt developmentandpsychometricevaluationofthefatherengagementquestionnaire
AT piotrowskapatrycja developmentandpsychometricevaluationofthefatherengagementquestionnaire
AT collinsdanielaj developmentandpsychometricevaluationofthefatherengagementquestionnaire
AT moulcaroline developmentandpsychometricevaluationofthefatherengagementquestionnaire
AT frickpaulj developmentandpsychometricevaluationofthefatherengagementquestionnaire
AT hawesdavidj developmentandpsychometricevaluationofthefatherengagementquestionnaire
AT kimonisevar developmentandpsychometricevaluationofthefatherengagementquestionnaire
AT lenrootrhoshelk developmentandpsychometricevaluationofthefatherengagementquestionnaire
AT andersonvicki developmentandpsychometricevaluationofthefatherengagementquestionnaire
AT daddsmarkr developmentandpsychometricevaluationofthefatherengagementquestionnaire