Cargando…
CT colonography: size reduction of submerged colorectal polyps due to electronic cleansing and CT-window settings
OBJECTIVES: To assess whether electronic cleansing (EC) of tagged residue and different computed tomography (CT) windows influence the size of colorectal polyps in CT colonography (CTC). METHODS: A database of 894 colonoscopy-validated CTC datasets of a low-prevalence cohort was retrospectively revi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6182748/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29761359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5416-0 |
_version_ | 1783362638254702592 |
---|---|
author | Bräuer, Christian Lefere, Philippe Gryspeerdt, Stefaan Ringl, Helmut Al-Mukhtar, Ali Apfaltrer, Paul Berzaczy, Dominik Füger, Barbara Furtner, Julia Müller-Mang, Christina Pones, Matthias Scharitzer, Martina Woitek, Ramona Graser, Anno Weber, Michael Mang, Thomas |
author_facet | Bräuer, Christian Lefere, Philippe Gryspeerdt, Stefaan Ringl, Helmut Al-Mukhtar, Ali Apfaltrer, Paul Berzaczy, Dominik Füger, Barbara Furtner, Julia Müller-Mang, Christina Pones, Matthias Scharitzer, Martina Woitek, Ramona Graser, Anno Weber, Michael Mang, Thomas |
author_sort | Bräuer, Christian |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To assess whether electronic cleansing (EC) of tagged residue and different computed tomography (CT) windows influence the size of colorectal polyps in CT colonography (CTC). METHODS: A database of 894 colonoscopy-validated CTC datasets of a low-prevalence cohort was retrospectively reviewed to identify patients with polyps ≥6 mm that were entirely submerged in tagged residue. Ten radiologists independently measured the largest diameter of each polyp, two-dimensionally, before and after EC in colon, bone, and soft-tissue-windows, in randomised order. Differences in size and polyp count before and after EC were calculated for size categories ≥6 mm and ≥10 mm. Statistical testing involved 95% confidence interval, intraclass correlation and mixed-model ANOVA. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients with 48 polyps were included. Mean polyp size before EC was 9.8 mm in colon, 9.9 mm in bone and 8.2 mm in soft-tissue windows. After EC, the mean polyp size decreased significantly to 9.4 mm in colon, 9.1 mm in bone and 7.1 mm in soft-tissue windows. Compared to unsubtracted colon windows, EC, performed in colon, bone and soft-tissue windows, led to a shift of 6 (12,5%), 10 (20.8%) and 25 (52.1%) polyps ≥6 mm into the next smaller size category, thus affecting patient risk stratification. CONCLUSIONS: EC and narrow CT windows significantly reduce the size of polyps submerged in tagged residue. Polyp measurements should be performed in unsubtracted colon windows. KEY POINTS: • EC significantly reduces the size of polyps submerged in tagged residue. • Abdominal CT-window settings significantly underestimate 2D sizes of submerged polyps. • Size reduction in EC is significantly greater in narrow than wide windows. • Underestimation of polyp size due to EC may lead to inadequate treatment. • Polyp measurements should be performed in unsubtracted images using a colon window. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-018-5416-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6182748 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61827482018-10-24 CT colonography: size reduction of submerged colorectal polyps due to electronic cleansing and CT-window settings Bräuer, Christian Lefere, Philippe Gryspeerdt, Stefaan Ringl, Helmut Al-Mukhtar, Ali Apfaltrer, Paul Berzaczy, Dominik Füger, Barbara Furtner, Julia Müller-Mang, Christina Pones, Matthias Scharitzer, Martina Woitek, Ramona Graser, Anno Weber, Michael Mang, Thomas Eur Radiol Gastrointestinal OBJECTIVES: To assess whether electronic cleansing (EC) of tagged residue and different computed tomography (CT) windows influence the size of colorectal polyps in CT colonography (CTC). METHODS: A database of 894 colonoscopy-validated CTC datasets of a low-prevalence cohort was retrospectively reviewed to identify patients with polyps ≥6 mm that were entirely submerged in tagged residue. Ten radiologists independently measured the largest diameter of each polyp, two-dimensionally, before and after EC in colon, bone, and soft-tissue-windows, in randomised order. Differences in size and polyp count before and after EC were calculated for size categories ≥6 mm and ≥10 mm. Statistical testing involved 95% confidence interval, intraclass correlation and mixed-model ANOVA. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients with 48 polyps were included. Mean polyp size before EC was 9.8 mm in colon, 9.9 mm in bone and 8.2 mm in soft-tissue windows. After EC, the mean polyp size decreased significantly to 9.4 mm in colon, 9.1 mm in bone and 7.1 mm in soft-tissue windows. Compared to unsubtracted colon windows, EC, performed in colon, bone and soft-tissue windows, led to a shift of 6 (12,5%), 10 (20.8%) and 25 (52.1%) polyps ≥6 mm into the next smaller size category, thus affecting patient risk stratification. CONCLUSIONS: EC and narrow CT windows significantly reduce the size of polyps submerged in tagged residue. Polyp measurements should be performed in unsubtracted colon windows. KEY POINTS: • EC significantly reduces the size of polyps submerged in tagged residue. • Abdominal CT-window settings significantly underestimate 2D sizes of submerged polyps. • Size reduction in EC is significantly greater in narrow than wide windows. • Underestimation of polyp size due to EC may lead to inadequate treatment. • Polyp measurements should be performed in unsubtracted images using a colon window. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-018-5416-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-05-14 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6182748/ /pubmed/29761359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5416-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Gastrointestinal Bräuer, Christian Lefere, Philippe Gryspeerdt, Stefaan Ringl, Helmut Al-Mukhtar, Ali Apfaltrer, Paul Berzaczy, Dominik Füger, Barbara Furtner, Julia Müller-Mang, Christina Pones, Matthias Scharitzer, Martina Woitek, Ramona Graser, Anno Weber, Michael Mang, Thomas CT colonography: size reduction of submerged colorectal polyps due to electronic cleansing and CT-window settings |
title | CT colonography: size reduction of submerged colorectal polyps due to electronic cleansing and CT-window settings |
title_full | CT colonography: size reduction of submerged colorectal polyps due to electronic cleansing and CT-window settings |
title_fullStr | CT colonography: size reduction of submerged colorectal polyps due to electronic cleansing and CT-window settings |
title_full_unstemmed | CT colonography: size reduction of submerged colorectal polyps due to electronic cleansing and CT-window settings |
title_short | CT colonography: size reduction of submerged colorectal polyps due to electronic cleansing and CT-window settings |
title_sort | ct colonography: size reduction of submerged colorectal polyps due to electronic cleansing and ct-window settings |
topic | Gastrointestinal |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6182748/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29761359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5416-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brauerchristian ctcolonographysizereductionofsubmergedcolorectalpolypsduetoelectroniccleansingandctwindowsettings AT leferephilippe ctcolonographysizereductionofsubmergedcolorectalpolypsduetoelectroniccleansingandctwindowsettings AT gryspeerdtstefaan ctcolonographysizereductionofsubmergedcolorectalpolypsduetoelectroniccleansingandctwindowsettings AT ringlhelmut ctcolonographysizereductionofsubmergedcolorectalpolypsduetoelectroniccleansingandctwindowsettings AT almukhtarali ctcolonographysizereductionofsubmergedcolorectalpolypsduetoelectroniccleansingandctwindowsettings AT apfaltrerpaul ctcolonographysizereductionofsubmergedcolorectalpolypsduetoelectroniccleansingandctwindowsettings AT berzaczydominik ctcolonographysizereductionofsubmergedcolorectalpolypsduetoelectroniccleansingandctwindowsettings AT fugerbarbara ctcolonographysizereductionofsubmergedcolorectalpolypsduetoelectroniccleansingandctwindowsettings AT furtnerjulia ctcolonographysizereductionofsubmergedcolorectalpolypsduetoelectroniccleansingandctwindowsettings AT mullermangchristina ctcolonographysizereductionofsubmergedcolorectalpolypsduetoelectroniccleansingandctwindowsettings AT ponesmatthias ctcolonographysizereductionofsubmergedcolorectalpolypsduetoelectroniccleansingandctwindowsettings AT scharitzermartina ctcolonographysizereductionofsubmergedcolorectalpolypsduetoelectroniccleansingandctwindowsettings AT woitekramona ctcolonographysizereductionofsubmergedcolorectalpolypsduetoelectroniccleansingandctwindowsettings AT graseranno ctcolonographysizereductionofsubmergedcolorectalpolypsduetoelectroniccleansingandctwindowsettings AT webermichael ctcolonographysizereductionofsubmergedcolorectalpolypsduetoelectroniccleansingandctwindowsettings AT mangthomas ctcolonographysizereductionofsubmergedcolorectalpolypsduetoelectroniccleansingandctwindowsettings |