Cargando…

CT colonography: size reduction of submerged colorectal polyps due to electronic cleansing and CT-window settings

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether electronic cleansing (EC) of tagged residue and different computed tomography (CT) windows influence the size of colorectal polyps in CT colonography (CTC). METHODS: A database of 894 colonoscopy-validated CTC datasets of a low-prevalence cohort was retrospectively revi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bräuer, Christian, Lefere, Philippe, Gryspeerdt, Stefaan, Ringl, Helmut, Al-Mukhtar, Ali, Apfaltrer, Paul, Berzaczy, Dominik, Füger, Barbara, Furtner, Julia, Müller-Mang, Christina, Pones, Matthias, Scharitzer, Martina, Woitek, Ramona, Graser, Anno, Weber, Michael, Mang, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6182748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29761359
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5416-0
_version_ 1783362638254702592
author Bräuer, Christian
Lefere, Philippe
Gryspeerdt, Stefaan
Ringl, Helmut
Al-Mukhtar, Ali
Apfaltrer, Paul
Berzaczy, Dominik
Füger, Barbara
Furtner, Julia
Müller-Mang, Christina
Pones, Matthias
Scharitzer, Martina
Woitek, Ramona
Graser, Anno
Weber, Michael
Mang, Thomas
author_facet Bräuer, Christian
Lefere, Philippe
Gryspeerdt, Stefaan
Ringl, Helmut
Al-Mukhtar, Ali
Apfaltrer, Paul
Berzaczy, Dominik
Füger, Barbara
Furtner, Julia
Müller-Mang, Christina
Pones, Matthias
Scharitzer, Martina
Woitek, Ramona
Graser, Anno
Weber, Michael
Mang, Thomas
author_sort Bräuer, Christian
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To assess whether electronic cleansing (EC) of tagged residue and different computed tomography (CT) windows influence the size of colorectal polyps in CT colonography (CTC). METHODS: A database of 894 colonoscopy-validated CTC datasets of a low-prevalence cohort was retrospectively reviewed to identify patients with polyps ≥6 mm that were entirely submerged in tagged residue. Ten radiologists independently measured the largest diameter of each polyp, two-dimensionally, before and after EC in colon, bone, and soft-tissue-windows, in randomised order. Differences in size and polyp count before and after EC were calculated for size categories ≥6 mm and ≥10 mm. Statistical testing involved 95% confidence interval, intraclass correlation and mixed-model ANOVA. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients with 48 polyps were included. Mean polyp size before EC was 9.8 mm in colon, 9.9 mm in bone and 8.2 mm in soft-tissue windows. After EC, the mean polyp size decreased significantly to 9.4 mm in colon, 9.1 mm in bone and 7.1 mm in soft-tissue windows. Compared to unsubtracted colon windows, EC, performed in colon, bone and soft-tissue windows, led to a shift of 6 (12,5%), 10 (20.8%) and 25 (52.1%) polyps ≥6 mm into the next smaller size category, thus affecting patient risk stratification. CONCLUSIONS: EC and narrow CT windows significantly reduce the size of polyps submerged in tagged residue. Polyp measurements should be performed in unsubtracted colon windows. KEY POINTS: • EC significantly reduces the size of polyps submerged in tagged residue. • Abdominal CT-window settings significantly underestimate 2D sizes of submerged polyps. • Size reduction in EC is significantly greater in narrow than wide windows. • Underestimation of polyp size due to EC may lead to inadequate treatment. • Polyp measurements should be performed in unsubtracted images using a colon window. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-018-5416-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6182748
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61827482018-10-24 CT colonography: size reduction of submerged colorectal polyps due to electronic cleansing and CT-window settings Bräuer, Christian Lefere, Philippe Gryspeerdt, Stefaan Ringl, Helmut Al-Mukhtar, Ali Apfaltrer, Paul Berzaczy, Dominik Füger, Barbara Furtner, Julia Müller-Mang, Christina Pones, Matthias Scharitzer, Martina Woitek, Ramona Graser, Anno Weber, Michael Mang, Thomas Eur Radiol Gastrointestinal OBJECTIVES: To assess whether electronic cleansing (EC) of tagged residue and different computed tomography (CT) windows influence the size of colorectal polyps in CT colonography (CTC). METHODS: A database of 894 colonoscopy-validated CTC datasets of a low-prevalence cohort was retrospectively reviewed to identify patients with polyps ≥6 mm that were entirely submerged in tagged residue. Ten radiologists independently measured the largest diameter of each polyp, two-dimensionally, before and after EC in colon, bone, and soft-tissue-windows, in randomised order. Differences in size and polyp count before and after EC were calculated for size categories ≥6 mm and ≥10 mm. Statistical testing involved 95% confidence interval, intraclass correlation and mixed-model ANOVA. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients with 48 polyps were included. Mean polyp size before EC was 9.8 mm in colon, 9.9 mm in bone and 8.2 mm in soft-tissue windows. After EC, the mean polyp size decreased significantly to 9.4 mm in colon, 9.1 mm in bone and 7.1 mm in soft-tissue windows. Compared to unsubtracted colon windows, EC, performed in colon, bone and soft-tissue windows, led to a shift of 6 (12,5%), 10 (20.8%) and 25 (52.1%) polyps ≥6 mm into the next smaller size category, thus affecting patient risk stratification. CONCLUSIONS: EC and narrow CT windows significantly reduce the size of polyps submerged in tagged residue. Polyp measurements should be performed in unsubtracted colon windows. KEY POINTS: • EC significantly reduces the size of polyps submerged in tagged residue. • Abdominal CT-window settings significantly underestimate 2D sizes of submerged polyps. • Size reduction in EC is significantly greater in narrow than wide windows. • Underestimation of polyp size due to EC may lead to inadequate treatment. • Polyp measurements should be performed in unsubtracted images using a colon window. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-018-5416-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-05-14 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6182748/ /pubmed/29761359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5416-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Gastrointestinal
Bräuer, Christian
Lefere, Philippe
Gryspeerdt, Stefaan
Ringl, Helmut
Al-Mukhtar, Ali
Apfaltrer, Paul
Berzaczy, Dominik
Füger, Barbara
Furtner, Julia
Müller-Mang, Christina
Pones, Matthias
Scharitzer, Martina
Woitek, Ramona
Graser, Anno
Weber, Michael
Mang, Thomas
CT colonography: size reduction of submerged colorectal polyps due to electronic cleansing and CT-window settings
title CT colonography: size reduction of submerged colorectal polyps due to electronic cleansing and CT-window settings
title_full CT colonography: size reduction of submerged colorectal polyps due to electronic cleansing and CT-window settings
title_fullStr CT colonography: size reduction of submerged colorectal polyps due to electronic cleansing and CT-window settings
title_full_unstemmed CT colonography: size reduction of submerged colorectal polyps due to electronic cleansing and CT-window settings
title_short CT colonography: size reduction of submerged colorectal polyps due to electronic cleansing and CT-window settings
title_sort ct colonography: size reduction of submerged colorectal polyps due to electronic cleansing and ct-window settings
topic Gastrointestinal
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6182748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29761359
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5416-0
work_keys_str_mv AT brauerchristian ctcolonographysizereductionofsubmergedcolorectalpolypsduetoelectroniccleansingandctwindowsettings
AT leferephilippe ctcolonographysizereductionofsubmergedcolorectalpolypsduetoelectroniccleansingandctwindowsettings
AT gryspeerdtstefaan ctcolonographysizereductionofsubmergedcolorectalpolypsduetoelectroniccleansingandctwindowsettings
AT ringlhelmut ctcolonographysizereductionofsubmergedcolorectalpolypsduetoelectroniccleansingandctwindowsettings
AT almukhtarali ctcolonographysizereductionofsubmergedcolorectalpolypsduetoelectroniccleansingandctwindowsettings
AT apfaltrerpaul ctcolonographysizereductionofsubmergedcolorectalpolypsduetoelectroniccleansingandctwindowsettings
AT berzaczydominik ctcolonographysizereductionofsubmergedcolorectalpolypsduetoelectroniccleansingandctwindowsettings
AT fugerbarbara ctcolonographysizereductionofsubmergedcolorectalpolypsduetoelectroniccleansingandctwindowsettings
AT furtnerjulia ctcolonographysizereductionofsubmergedcolorectalpolypsduetoelectroniccleansingandctwindowsettings
AT mullermangchristina ctcolonographysizereductionofsubmergedcolorectalpolypsduetoelectroniccleansingandctwindowsettings
AT ponesmatthias ctcolonographysizereductionofsubmergedcolorectalpolypsduetoelectroniccleansingandctwindowsettings
AT scharitzermartina ctcolonographysizereductionofsubmergedcolorectalpolypsduetoelectroniccleansingandctwindowsettings
AT woitekramona ctcolonographysizereductionofsubmergedcolorectalpolypsduetoelectroniccleansingandctwindowsettings
AT graseranno ctcolonographysizereductionofsubmergedcolorectalpolypsduetoelectroniccleansingandctwindowsettings
AT webermichael ctcolonographysizereductionofsubmergedcolorectalpolypsduetoelectroniccleansingandctwindowsettings
AT mangthomas ctcolonographysizereductionofsubmergedcolorectalpolypsduetoelectroniccleansingandctwindowsettings