Cargando…

The acceptance of the clinical photographic posture assessment tool (CPPAT)

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of evidence-based quantitative clinical methods to adequately assess posture. Our team developed a clinical photographic posture assessment tool (CPPAT) and implemented this tool in clinical practice to standardize posture assessment. The objectives were to determine the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fortin, Carole, van Schaik, Paul, Aubin-Fournier, Jean-François, Bettany-Saltikov, Josette, Bernard, Jean-Claude, Ehrmann Feldman, Debbie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6182862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30309332
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2272-7
_version_ 1783362659562815488
author Fortin, Carole
van Schaik, Paul
Aubin-Fournier, Jean-François
Bettany-Saltikov, Josette
Bernard, Jean-Claude
Ehrmann Feldman, Debbie
author_facet Fortin, Carole
van Schaik, Paul
Aubin-Fournier, Jean-François
Bettany-Saltikov, Josette
Bernard, Jean-Claude
Ehrmann Feldman, Debbie
author_sort Fortin, Carole
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is a lack of evidence-based quantitative clinical methods to adequately assess posture. Our team developed a clinical photographic posture assessment tool (CPPAT) and implemented this tool in clinical practice to standardize posture assessment. The objectives were to determine the level of acceptance of the CPPAT and to document predictors as well as facilitators of and barriers to the acceptance of this tool by clinicians doing posture re-education. METHODS: This is a prospective study focussing on technology acceptance. Thirty-two clinician participants (physical therapists and sport therapists) received a 3–5 h training workshop explaining how to use the CPPAT. Over a three-month trial, they recorded time-on-task for a complete posture evaluation (photo - and photo-processing). Subsequently, participants rated their acceptance of the tool and commented on facilitators and barriers of the clinical method. RESULTS: Twenty-three clinician participants completed the trial. They took 22 (mean) ± 10 min (SD) for photo acquisition and 36 min ± 19 min for photo-processing. Acceptance of the CPPAT was high. Perceived ease of use was an indirect predictor of intention to use, mediated by perceived usefulness. Analysis time was an indirect predictor, mediated by perceived usefulness, and a marginally significant direct predictor. Principal facilitators were objective measurements, visualization, utility, and ease of use. Barriers were time to do a complete analysis of posture, quality of human-computer interaction, non-automation of posture index calculation and photo transfer, and lack of versatility. CONCLUSION: The CPPAT is perceived as useful and easy to use by clinicians and may facilitate the quantitative analysis of posture. Adapting the user-interface and functionality to quantify posture may facilitate a wider adoption of the tool. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12891-018-2272-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6182862
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61828622018-10-18 The acceptance of the clinical photographic posture assessment tool (CPPAT) Fortin, Carole van Schaik, Paul Aubin-Fournier, Jean-François Bettany-Saltikov, Josette Bernard, Jean-Claude Ehrmann Feldman, Debbie BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: There is a lack of evidence-based quantitative clinical methods to adequately assess posture. Our team developed a clinical photographic posture assessment tool (CPPAT) and implemented this tool in clinical practice to standardize posture assessment. The objectives were to determine the level of acceptance of the CPPAT and to document predictors as well as facilitators of and barriers to the acceptance of this tool by clinicians doing posture re-education. METHODS: This is a prospective study focussing on technology acceptance. Thirty-two clinician participants (physical therapists and sport therapists) received a 3–5 h training workshop explaining how to use the CPPAT. Over a three-month trial, they recorded time-on-task for a complete posture evaluation (photo - and photo-processing). Subsequently, participants rated their acceptance of the tool and commented on facilitators and barriers of the clinical method. RESULTS: Twenty-three clinician participants completed the trial. They took 22 (mean) ± 10 min (SD) for photo acquisition and 36 min ± 19 min for photo-processing. Acceptance of the CPPAT was high. Perceived ease of use was an indirect predictor of intention to use, mediated by perceived usefulness. Analysis time was an indirect predictor, mediated by perceived usefulness, and a marginally significant direct predictor. Principal facilitators were objective measurements, visualization, utility, and ease of use. Barriers were time to do a complete analysis of posture, quality of human-computer interaction, non-automation of posture index calculation and photo transfer, and lack of versatility. CONCLUSION: The CPPAT is perceived as useful and easy to use by clinicians and may facilitate the quantitative analysis of posture. Adapting the user-interface and functionality to quantify posture may facilitate a wider adoption of the tool. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12891-018-2272-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6182862/ /pubmed/30309332 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2272-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fortin, Carole
van Schaik, Paul
Aubin-Fournier, Jean-François
Bettany-Saltikov, Josette
Bernard, Jean-Claude
Ehrmann Feldman, Debbie
The acceptance of the clinical photographic posture assessment tool (CPPAT)
title The acceptance of the clinical photographic posture assessment tool (CPPAT)
title_full The acceptance of the clinical photographic posture assessment tool (CPPAT)
title_fullStr The acceptance of the clinical photographic posture assessment tool (CPPAT)
title_full_unstemmed The acceptance of the clinical photographic posture assessment tool (CPPAT)
title_short The acceptance of the clinical photographic posture assessment tool (CPPAT)
title_sort acceptance of the clinical photographic posture assessment tool (cppat)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6182862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30309332
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2272-7
work_keys_str_mv AT fortincarole theacceptanceoftheclinicalphotographicpostureassessmenttoolcppat
AT vanschaikpaul theacceptanceoftheclinicalphotographicpostureassessmenttoolcppat
AT aubinfournierjeanfrancois theacceptanceoftheclinicalphotographicpostureassessmenttoolcppat
AT bettanysaltikovjosette theacceptanceoftheclinicalphotographicpostureassessmenttoolcppat
AT bernardjeanclaude theacceptanceoftheclinicalphotographicpostureassessmenttoolcppat
AT ehrmannfeldmandebbie theacceptanceoftheclinicalphotographicpostureassessmenttoolcppat
AT fortincarole acceptanceoftheclinicalphotographicpostureassessmenttoolcppat
AT vanschaikpaul acceptanceoftheclinicalphotographicpostureassessmenttoolcppat
AT aubinfournierjeanfrancois acceptanceoftheclinicalphotographicpostureassessmenttoolcppat
AT bettanysaltikovjosette acceptanceoftheclinicalphotographicpostureassessmenttoolcppat
AT bernardjeanclaude acceptanceoftheclinicalphotographicpostureassessmenttoolcppat
AT ehrmannfeldmandebbie acceptanceoftheclinicalphotographicpostureassessmenttoolcppat