Cargando…

Modeling cumulative overall prevention efficacy for the VRC01 phase 2b efficacy trials

The Antibody Mediated Prevention trials are assessing whether intravenously-administered VRC01 (10 mg/kg or 30 mg/kg vs placebo) can prevent HIV infection. In a modeling exercise, we used two models to predict the overall prevention efficacy (PE) of each VRC01 dose in preventing HIV infection. For t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Yunda, Karuna, Shelly, Carpp, Lindsay N., Reeves, Daniel, Pegu, Amarendra, Seaton, Kelly, Mayer, Kenneth, Schiffer, Joshua, Mascola, John, Gilbert, Peter B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6183277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29683765
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2018.1462640
_version_ 1783362695652704256
author Huang, Yunda
Karuna, Shelly
Carpp, Lindsay N.
Reeves, Daniel
Pegu, Amarendra
Seaton, Kelly
Mayer, Kenneth
Schiffer, Joshua
Mascola, John
Gilbert, Peter B.
author_facet Huang, Yunda
Karuna, Shelly
Carpp, Lindsay N.
Reeves, Daniel
Pegu, Amarendra
Seaton, Kelly
Mayer, Kenneth
Schiffer, Joshua
Mascola, John
Gilbert, Peter B.
author_sort Huang, Yunda
collection PubMed
description The Antibody Mediated Prevention trials are assessing whether intravenously-administered VRC01 (10 mg/kg or 30 mg/kg vs placebo) can prevent HIV infection. In a modeling exercise, we used two models to predict the overall prevention efficacy (PE) of each VRC01 dose in preventing HIV infection. For the first per-exposure PE model, parameters were estimated from studies where nonhuman primates (NHPs) were administered high-dose intra-rectal simian-human immunodeficiency virus challenge two days post-VRC01 infusion at various dosages (“NHP model”). To account for the fact that humans may require greater VRC01 concentration to achieve the same level of protection, we next assumed that a 5-fold greater VRC01 serum concentration would be needed to provide the same level of per-exposure PE as seen in the NHP data (“5-fold model”). For the 10 mg/kg regimen, the 5-fold and NHP models predict an overall PE of 37% and 64%, respectively; for the 30 mg/kg regimen, the two models predict an overall PE of 53% and 82%, respectively. Our results support that VRC01 may plausibly confer positive PE in the AMP trials. Given the lack of available knowledge and data to verify the assumptions undergirding our modeling framework, its quantitative predictions of overall PE are preliminary. Its current main applications are to supplement decisions to advance mAb regimens to efficacy trials, and to enable mAb regimen ranking by their potential for PE in humans.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6183277
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61832772018-10-19 Modeling cumulative overall prevention efficacy for the VRC01 phase 2b efficacy trials Huang, Yunda Karuna, Shelly Carpp, Lindsay N. Reeves, Daniel Pegu, Amarendra Seaton, Kelly Mayer, Kenneth Schiffer, Joshua Mascola, John Gilbert, Peter B. Hum Vaccin Immunother Research Paper The Antibody Mediated Prevention trials are assessing whether intravenously-administered VRC01 (10 mg/kg or 30 mg/kg vs placebo) can prevent HIV infection. In a modeling exercise, we used two models to predict the overall prevention efficacy (PE) of each VRC01 dose in preventing HIV infection. For the first per-exposure PE model, parameters were estimated from studies where nonhuman primates (NHPs) were administered high-dose intra-rectal simian-human immunodeficiency virus challenge two days post-VRC01 infusion at various dosages (“NHP model”). To account for the fact that humans may require greater VRC01 concentration to achieve the same level of protection, we next assumed that a 5-fold greater VRC01 serum concentration would be needed to provide the same level of per-exposure PE as seen in the NHP data (“5-fold model”). For the 10 mg/kg regimen, the 5-fold and NHP models predict an overall PE of 37% and 64%, respectively; for the 30 mg/kg regimen, the two models predict an overall PE of 53% and 82%, respectively. Our results support that VRC01 may plausibly confer positive PE in the AMP trials. Given the lack of available knowledge and data to verify the assumptions undergirding our modeling framework, its quantitative predictions of overall PE are preliminary. Its current main applications are to supplement decisions to advance mAb regimens to efficacy trials, and to enable mAb regimen ranking by their potential for PE in humans. Taylor & Francis 2018-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6183277/ /pubmed/29683765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2018.1462640 Text en © 2018 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Huang, Yunda
Karuna, Shelly
Carpp, Lindsay N.
Reeves, Daniel
Pegu, Amarendra
Seaton, Kelly
Mayer, Kenneth
Schiffer, Joshua
Mascola, John
Gilbert, Peter B.
Modeling cumulative overall prevention efficacy for the VRC01 phase 2b efficacy trials
title Modeling cumulative overall prevention efficacy for the VRC01 phase 2b efficacy trials
title_full Modeling cumulative overall prevention efficacy for the VRC01 phase 2b efficacy trials
title_fullStr Modeling cumulative overall prevention efficacy for the VRC01 phase 2b efficacy trials
title_full_unstemmed Modeling cumulative overall prevention efficacy for the VRC01 phase 2b efficacy trials
title_short Modeling cumulative overall prevention efficacy for the VRC01 phase 2b efficacy trials
title_sort modeling cumulative overall prevention efficacy for the vrc01 phase 2b efficacy trials
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6183277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29683765
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2018.1462640
work_keys_str_mv AT huangyunda modelingcumulativeoverallpreventionefficacyforthevrc01phase2befficacytrials
AT karunashelly modelingcumulativeoverallpreventionefficacyforthevrc01phase2befficacytrials
AT carpplindsayn modelingcumulativeoverallpreventionefficacyforthevrc01phase2befficacytrials
AT reevesdaniel modelingcumulativeoverallpreventionefficacyforthevrc01phase2befficacytrials
AT peguamarendra modelingcumulativeoverallpreventionefficacyforthevrc01phase2befficacytrials
AT seatonkelly modelingcumulativeoverallpreventionefficacyforthevrc01phase2befficacytrials
AT mayerkenneth modelingcumulativeoverallpreventionefficacyforthevrc01phase2befficacytrials
AT schifferjoshua modelingcumulativeoverallpreventionefficacyforthevrc01phase2befficacytrials
AT mascolajohn modelingcumulativeoverallpreventionefficacyforthevrc01phase2befficacytrials
AT gilbertpeterb modelingcumulativeoverallpreventionefficacyforthevrc01phase2befficacytrials