Cargando…
Modeling cumulative overall prevention efficacy for the VRC01 phase 2b efficacy trials
The Antibody Mediated Prevention trials are assessing whether intravenously-administered VRC01 (10 mg/kg or 30 mg/kg vs placebo) can prevent HIV infection. In a modeling exercise, we used two models to predict the overall prevention efficacy (PE) of each VRC01 dose in preventing HIV infection. For t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6183277/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29683765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2018.1462640 |
_version_ | 1783362695652704256 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Yunda Karuna, Shelly Carpp, Lindsay N. Reeves, Daniel Pegu, Amarendra Seaton, Kelly Mayer, Kenneth Schiffer, Joshua Mascola, John Gilbert, Peter B. |
author_facet | Huang, Yunda Karuna, Shelly Carpp, Lindsay N. Reeves, Daniel Pegu, Amarendra Seaton, Kelly Mayer, Kenneth Schiffer, Joshua Mascola, John Gilbert, Peter B. |
author_sort | Huang, Yunda |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Antibody Mediated Prevention trials are assessing whether intravenously-administered VRC01 (10 mg/kg or 30 mg/kg vs placebo) can prevent HIV infection. In a modeling exercise, we used two models to predict the overall prevention efficacy (PE) of each VRC01 dose in preventing HIV infection. For the first per-exposure PE model, parameters were estimated from studies where nonhuman primates (NHPs) were administered high-dose intra-rectal simian-human immunodeficiency virus challenge two days post-VRC01 infusion at various dosages (“NHP model”). To account for the fact that humans may require greater VRC01 concentration to achieve the same level of protection, we next assumed that a 5-fold greater VRC01 serum concentration would be needed to provide the same level of per-exposure PE as seen in the NHP data (“5-fold model”). For the 10 mg/kg regimen, the 5-fold and NHP models predict an overall PE of 37% and 64%, respectively; for the 30 mg/kg regimen, the two models predict an overall PE of 53% and 82%, respectively. Our results support that VRC01 may plausibly confer positive PE in the AMP trials. Given the lack of available knowledge and data to verify the assumptions undergirding our modeling framework, its quantitative predictions of overall PE are preliminary. Its current main applications are to supplement decisions to advance mAb regimens to efficacy trials, and to enable mAb regimen ranking by their potential for PE in humans. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6183277 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61832772018-10-19 Modeling cumulative overall prevention efficacy for the VRC01 phase 2b efficacy trials Huang, Yunda Karuna, Shelly Carpp, Lindsay N. Reeves, Daniel Pegu, Amarendra Seaton, Kelly Mayer, Kenneth Schiffer, Joshua Mascola, John Gilbert, Peter B. Hum Vaccin Immunother Research Paper The Antibody Mediated Prevention trials are assessing whether intravenously-administered VRC01 (10 mg/kg or 30 mg/kg vs placebo) can prevent HIV infection. In a modeling exercise, we used two models to predict the overall prevention efficacy (PE) of each VRC01 dose in preventing HIV infection. For the first per-exposure PE model, parameters were estimated from studies where nonhuman primates (NHPs) were administered high-dose intra-rectal simian-human immunodeficiency virus challenge two days post-VRC01 infusion at various dosages (“NHP model”). To account for the fact that humans may require greater VRC01 concentration to achieve the same level of protection, we next assumed that a 5-fold greater VRC01 serum concentration would be needed to provide the same level of per-exposure PE as seen in the NHP data (“5-fold model”). For the 10 mg/kg regimen, the 5-fold and NHP models predict an overall PE of 37% and 64%, respectively; for the 30 mg/kg regimen, the two models predict an overall PE of 53% and 82%, respectively. Our results support that VRC01 may plausibly confer positive PE in the AMP trials. Given the lack of available knowledge and data to verify the assumptions undergirding our modeling framework, its quantitative predictions of overall PE are preliminary. Its current main applications are to supplement decisions to advance mAb regimens to efficacy trials, and to enable mAb regimen ranking by their potential for PE in humans. Taylor & Francis 2018-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6183277/ /pubmed/29683765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2018.1462640 Text en © 2018 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Huang, Yunda Karuna, Shelly Carpp, Lindsay N. Reeves, Daniel Pegu, Amarendra Seaton, Kelly Mayer, Kenneth Schiffer, Joshua Mascola, John Gilbert, Peter B. Modeling cumulative overall prevention efficacy for the VRC01 phase 2b efficacy trials |
title | Modeling cumulative overall prevention efficacy for the VRC01 phase 2b efficacy trials |
title_full | Modeling cumulative overall prevention efficacy for the VRC01 phase 2b efficacy trials |
title_fullStr | Modeling cumulative overall prevention efficacy for the VRC01 phase 2b efficacy trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Modeling cumulative overall prevention efficacy for the VRC01 phase 2b efficacy trials |
title_short | Modeling cumulative overall prevention efficacy for the VRC01 phase 2b efficacy trials |
title_sort | modeling cumulative overall prevention efficacy for the vrc01 phase 2b efficacy trials |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6183277/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29683765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2018.1462640 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangyunda modelingcumulativeoverallpreventionefficacyforthevrc01phase2befficacytrials AT karunashelly modelingcumulativeoverallpreventionefficacyforthevrc01phase2befficacytrials AT carpplindsayn modelingcumulativeoverallpreventionefficacyforthevrc01phase2befficacytrials AT reevesdaniel modelingcumulativeoverallpreventionefficacyforthevrc01phase2befficacytrials AT peguamarendra modelingcumulativeoverallpreventionefficacyforthevrc01phase2befficacytrials AT seatonkelly modelingcumulativeoverallpreventionefficacyforthevrc01phase2befficacytrials AT mayerkenneth modelingcumulativeoverallpreventionefficacyforthevrc01phase2befficacytrials AT schifferjoshua modelingcumulativeoverallpreventionefficacyforthevrc01phase2befficacytrials AT mascolajohn modelingcumulativeoverallpreventionefficacyforthevrc01phase2befficacytrials AT gilbertpeterb modelingcumulativeoverallpreventionefficacyforthevrc01phase2befficacytrials |