Cargando…

Clinical significance of prognostic score based on age, tumor size, and grade in gastric cancer after gastrectomy

BACKGROUND: Postoperative management and survival of gastric cancer is mainly determined by pathologic TNM stage. However, gastric cancer is a heterogeneity group, and the survival is quite different even when they are in the same TNM stage. Moreover, TNM stage system does not grasp other important...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lu, Jingfeng, Chen, Yi, Liu, Yanxia, Ding, Junbin, Piao, Zhenhao, Liu, Weiyan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6183590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30349362
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S171663
_version_ 1783362714127564800
author Lu, Jingfeng
Chen, Yi
Liu, Yanxia
Ding, Junbin
Piao, Zhenhao
Liu, Weiyan
author_facet Lu, Jingfeng
Chen, Yi
Liu, Yanxia
Ding, Junbin
Piao, Zhenhao
Liu, Weiyan
author_sort Lu, Jingfeng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Postoperative management and survival of gastric cancer is mainly determined by pathologic TNM stage. However, gastric cancer is a heterogeneity group, and the survival is quite different even when they are in the same TNM stage. Moreover, TNM stage system does not grasp other important clinicopathologic factors to determine the survival. The aim of the present study is to propose and validate prognostic score based on age, tumor size, and grade. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients diagnosed with gastric cancer in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 1988 to 2012 were included in the present study. Kaplan–Meier methods were adopted and multivariable Cox regression models were built for the analysis of long-term survival outcomes and risk factors. RESULTS: A total of 26,091 eligible patients diagnosed with noncardia gastric cancer were included in the study. In the univariate and multivariate survival analysis, age at diagnosis, tumor grade, and tumor size were validated as independent prognostic factors (P<0.05). Then, we proposed a prognostic score calculated from the number of risk factors, with 0, 1, and 2 points each given for favorable, intermediate, and poor prognostic categories of age (≤50, 50–70, and >70), grade (well, moderate, and poor differentiation), and size (≤3, 3–6, ≥7 cm). The prognostic score was verified as independent predictor in both univariate and multivariate survival analyses (P<0.001). In addition, nomograms on cause-specific survival were established according to prognostic factor and all other significant factors, and c-index was 0.715 (95% CI: 0.706–0.725). CONCLUSION: Prognostic score based on age, tumor size, and grade is an independent predictor of survival after gastrectomy. The novel prognostic score can improve the accuracy of prediction for current TNM stage system. Patients who are with a high prognostic score should undergo extensive follow-up after surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6183590
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61835902018-10-22 Clinical significance of prognostic score based on age, tumor size, and grade in gastric cancer after gastrectomy Lu, Jingfeng Chen, Yi Liu, Yanxia Ding, Junbin Piao, Zhenhao Liu, Weiyan Cancer Manag Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Postoperative management and survival of gastric cancer is mainly determined by pathologic TNM stage. However, gastric cancer is a heterogeneity group, and the survival is quite different even when they are in the same TNM stage. Moreover, TNM stage system does not grasp other important clinicopathologic factors to determine the survival. The aim of the present study is to propose and validate prognostic score based on age, tumor size, and grade. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients diagnosed with gastric cancer in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 1988 to 2012 were included in the present study. Kaplan–Meier methods were adopted and multivariable Cox regression models were built for the analysis of long-term survival outcomes and risk factors. RESULTS: A total of 26,091 eligible patients diagnosed with noncardia gastric cancer were included in the study. In the univariate and multivariate survival analysis, age at diagnosis, tumor grade, and tumor size were validated as independent prognostic factors (P<0.05). Then, we proposed a prognostic score calculated from the number of risk factors, with 0, 1, and 2 points each given for favorable, intermediate, and poor prognostic categories of age (≤50, 50–70, and >70), grade (well, moderate, and poor differentiation), and size (≤3, 3–6, ≥7 cm). The prognostic score was verified as independent predictor in both univariate and multivariate survival analyses (P<0.001). In addition, nomograms on cause-specific survival were established according to prognostic factor and all other significant factors, and c-index was 0.715 (95% CI: 0.706–0.725). CONCLUSION: Prognostic score based on age, tumor size, and grade is an independent predictor of survival after gastrectomy. The novel prognostic score can improve the accuracy of prediction for current TNM stage system. Patients who are with a high prognostic score should undergo extensive follow-up after surgery. Dove Medical Press 2018-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6183590/ /pubmed/30349362 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S171663 Text en © 2018 Lu et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Lu, Jingfeng
Chen, Yi
Liu, Yanxia
Ding, Junbin
Piao, Zhenhao
Liu, Weiyan
Clinical significance of prognostic score based on age, tumor size, and grade in gastric cancer after gastrectomy
title Clinical significance of prognostic score based on age, tumor size, and grade in gastric cancer after gastrectomy
title_full Clinical significance of prognostic score based on age, tumor size, and grade in gastric cancer after gastrectomy
title_fullStr Clinical significance of prognostic score based on age, tumor size, and grade in gastric cancer after gastrectomy
title_full_unstemmed Clinical significance of prognostic score based on age, tumor size, and grade in gastric cancer after gastrectomy
title_short Clinical significance of prognostic score based on age, tumor size, and grade in gastric cancer after gastrectomy
title_sort clinical significance of prognostic score based on age, tumor size, and grade in gastric cancer after gastrectomy
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6183590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30349362
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S171663
work_keys_str_mv AT lujingfeng clinicalsignificanceofprognosticscorebasedonagetumorsizeandgradeingastriccanceraftergastrectomy
AT chenyi clinicalsignificanceofprognosticscorebasedonagetumorsizeandgradeingastriccanceraftergastrectomy
AT liuyanxia clinicalsignificanceofprognosticscorebasedonagetumorsizeandgradeingastriccanceraftergastrectomy
AT dingjunbin clinicalsignificanceofprognosticscorebasedonagetumorsizeandgradeingastriccanceraftergastrectomy
AT piaozhenhao clinicalsignificanceofprognosticscorebasedonagetumorsizeandgradeingastriccanceraftergastrectomy
AT liuweiyan clinicalsignificanceofprognosticscorebasedonagetumorsizeandgradeingastriccanceraftergastrectomy