Cargando…

Utility of ultrasound assessment of diaphragmatic function before and after pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD patients

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) may improve respiratory symptoms and skeletal muscle strength in patients with COPD. We aimed to evaluate changes in ultrasound (US) measurements of diaphragmatic mobility and thickness after PR in COPD patients and to test its correlation with PR outcomes....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Crimi, Claudia, Heffler, Enrico, Augelletti, Teresa, Campisi, Raffaele, Noto, Alberto, Vancheri, Carlo, Crimi, Nunzio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6183592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30349221
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S171134
_version_ 1783362714598375424
author Crimi, Claudia
Heffler, Enrico
Augelletti, Teresa
Campisi, Raffaele
Noto, Alberto
Vancheri, Carlo
Crimi, Nunzio
author_facet Crimi, Claudia
Heffler, Enrico
Augelletti, Teresa
Campisi, Raffaele
Noto, Alberto
Vancheri, Carlo
Crimi, Nunzio
author_sort Crimi, Claudia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) may improve respiratory symptoms and skeletal muscle strength in patients with COPD. We aimed to evaluate changes in ultrasound (US) measurements of diaphragmatic mobility and thickness after PR in COPD patients and to test its correlation with PR outcomes. METHODS: Twenty-five COPD patients were enrolled and underwent a diaphragm US assessment before and after a 12-week PR program. RESULTS: We found a correlation between the intraindividual percentage of change in the diaphragmatic length of zone of apposition at functional residual capacity (ΔLzapp%) and the change in 6-minute walking distance (6MWD) after PR (rho=0.49, P=0.02). ΔLzapp% was significantly higher in patients with improved 6MWD and COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score (mean rank=12.03±2.57 vs 6.88±4.37; P=0.02). A ΔLzapp% of ≥10% was able to discriminate among patients with improved 6MWD, with a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 74%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for ΔLzapp% was 0.83. A cutoff value of ≥9% of ΔLzapp% had a positive predictive value in discriminating a reduction in ≥2 points of CAT score after PR, with a sensitivity and a specificity of 80% and 62%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Diaphragm US assessment represents a useful prognostic marker of PR outcomes in COPD patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6183592
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61835922018-10-22 Utility of ultrasound assessment of diaphragmatic function before and after pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD patients Crimi, Claudia Heffler, Enrico Augelletti, Teresa Campisi, Raffaele Noto, Alberto Vancheri, Carlo Crimi, Nunzio Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Original Research BACKGROUND: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) may improve respiratory symptoms and skeletal muscle strength in patients with COPD. We aimed to evaluate changes in ultrasound (US) measurements of diaphragmatic mobility and thickness after PR in COPD patients and to test its correlation with PR outcomes. METHODS: Twenty-five COPD patients were enrolled and underwent a diaphragm US assessment before and after a 12-week PR program. RESULTS: We found a correlation between the intraindividual percentage of change in the diaphragmatic length of zone of apposition at functional residual capacity (ΔLzapp%) and the change in 6-minute walking distance (6MWD) after PR (rho=0.49, P=0.02). ΔLzapp% was significantly higher in patients with improved 6MWD and COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score (mean rank=12.03±2.57 vs 6.88±4.37; P=0.02). A ΔLzapp% of ≥10% was able to discriminate among patients with improved 6MWD, with a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 74%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for ΔLzapp% was 0.83. A cutoff value of ≥9% of ΔLzapp% had a positive predictive value in discriminating a reduction in ≥2 points of CAT score after PR, with a sensitivity and a specificity of 80% and 62%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Diaphragm US assessment represents a useful prognostic marker of PR outcomes in COPD patients. Dove Medical Press 2018-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6183592/ /pubmed/30349221 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S171134 Text en © 2018 Crimi et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Crimi, Claudia
Heffler, Enrico
Augelletti, Teresa
Campisi, Raffaele
Noto, Alberto
Vancheri, Carlo
Crimi, Nunzio
Utility of ultrasound assessment of diaphragmatic function before and after pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD patients
title Utility of ultrasound assessment of diaphragmatic function before and after pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD patients
title_full Utility of ultrasound assessment of diaphragmatic function before and after pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD patients
title_fullStr Utility of ultrasound assessment of diaphragmatic function before and after pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD patients
title_full_unstemmed Utility of ultrasound assessment of diaphragmatic function before and after pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD patients
title_short Utility of ultrasound assessment of diaphragmatic function before and after pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD patients
title_sort utility of ultrasound assessment of diaphragmatic function before and after pulmonary rehabilitation in copd patients
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6183592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30349221
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S171134
work_keys_str_mv AT crimiclaudia utilityofultrasoundassessmentofdiaphragmaticfunctionbeforeandafterpulmonaryrehabilitationincopdpatients
AT hefflerenrico utilityofultrasoundassessmentofdiaphragmaticfunctionbeforeandafterpulmonaryrehabilitationincopdpatients
AT augellettiteresa utilityofultrasoundassessmentofdiaphragmaticfunctionbeforeandafterpulmonaryrehabilitationincopdpatients
AT campisiraffaele utilityofultrasoundassessmentofdiaphragmaticfunctionbeforeandafterpulmonaryrehabilitationincopdpatients
AT notoalberto utilityofultrasoundassessmentofdiaphragmaticfunctionbeforeandafterpulmonaryrehabilitationincopdpatients
AT vanchericarlo utilityofultrasoundassessmentofdiaphragmaticfunctionbeforeandafterpulmonaryrehabilitationincopdpatients
AT criminunzio utilityofultrasoundassessmentofdiaphragmaticfunctionbeforeandafterpulmonaryrehabilitationincopdpatients