Cargando…
The costs of being consequentialist: Social inference from instrumental harm and impartial beneficence
Previous work has demonstrated that people are more likely to trust “deontological” agents who reject harming one person to save many others than “consequentialist” agents who endorse such instrumental harms, which could explain the higher prevalence of non-consequentialist moral intuitions. Yet con...
Autores principales: | Everett, Jim A.C., Faber, Nadira S., Savulescu, Julian, Crockett, Molly J. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Academic Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6185873/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30393392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.07.004 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Impartiality and infectious disease: Prioritizing individuals versus the collective in antibiotic prescription
por: Dao, Bernadine, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
‘Utilitarian’ judgments in sacrificial moral dilemmas do not reflect impartial concern for the greater good
por: Kahane, Guy, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Beyond Sacrificial Harm: A Two-Dimensional Model of Utilitarian Psychology
por: Kahane, Guy, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Preferences and beliefs in ingroup favoritism
por: Everett, Jim A. C., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
The intuition of neutrality and consequentialist thinking: potential antinatalist implications
por: Pettersson, Karl
Publicado: (2013)