Cargando…
Prognostic influence of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in IPMN-derived invasive adenocarcinoma
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for mucinous cystic neoplasm of the pancreas carries a potential risk of inducing peritoneal tumor cell dissemination. We investigated the diagnostic yield and safety of EUS-FNA-based cytology of cells obtained from the pancre...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6186033/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30314433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4896-2 |
_version_ | 1783362794033250304 |
---|---|
author | Suzuki, Rei Irie, Hiroki Takagi, Tadayuki Sugimoto, Mitsuru Konno, Naoki Sato, Yuki Watanabe, Ko Nakamura, Jun Marubashi, Shigeru Hikichi, Takuto Ohira, Hiromasa |
author_facet | Suzuki, Rei Irie, Hiroki Takagi, Tadayuki Sugimoto, Mitsuru Konno, Naoki Sato, Yuki Watanabe, Ko Nakamura, Jun Marubashi, Shigeru Hikichi, Takuto Ohira, Hiromasa |
author_sort | Suzuki, Rei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for mucinous cystic neoplasm of the pancreas carries a potential risk of inducing peritoneal tumor cell dissemination. We investigated the diagnostic yield and safety of EUS-FNA-based cytology of cells obtained from the pancreatic invasion site of intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasm-derived adenocarcinoma (IPMC). METHODS: We included 22 surgically resected IPMCs and 84 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs). Among the IPMC cases, 14 did not undergo EUS-FNA before surgical resection. The diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA was compared between IPMC and PDAC. Additionally, prognosis (relapse-free and overall survival time after resection) and the rate of peritoneal dissemination were compared among IPMC with EUS-FNA, IPMC without EUS-FNA, and PDAC. A survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. RESULTS: (EUS-FNA diagnosis) There were no significant differences in the number of needle passages (PDAC 2.5 vs. IPMC 2.0 passages, P = 0.84) or puncture route (stomach/duodenum: 2/6 vs. 45/39, P = 0.29). However, the correct diagnosis rate was significantly higher in PDAC (92.9%) than in IPMC (62.5%) (P = 0.03). No procedure-related adverse events occurred. Peritoneal lavage cytology performed during the operation was negative in all cases. (Prognosis) Among IPMC with EUS-FNA, IPMC without EUS-FNA, and PDAC, there were no significant differences in relapse-free survival (21.0 vs. 22.4 vs. 12.5 months, respectively; P = 0.64) or overall survival time (35.5 vs. 53.1 vs. 35.9 months, respectively; P = 0.42), and peritoneal dissemination was detected during the observation period in 25%, 28.5%, and 21.4% cases, respectively (P = 0.82). CONCLUSION: Even though a correct diagnosis was more difficult to obtain in IPMC than in PDAC, IPMC allows specimens to be obtained without influencing the rate of recurrence and prognosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6186033 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61860332018-10-19 Prognostic influence of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in IPMN-derived invasive adenocarcinoma Suzuki, Rei Irie, Hiroki Takagi, Tadayuki Sugimoto, Mitsuru Konno, Naoki Sato, Yuki Watanabe, Ko Nakamura, Jun Marubashi, Shigeru Hikichi, Takuto Ohira, Hiromasa BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for mucinous cystic neoplasm of the pancreas carries a potential risk of inducing peritoneal tumor cell dissemination. We investigated the diagnostic yield and safety of EUS-FNA-based cytology of cells obtained from the pancreatic invasion site of intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasm-derived adenocarcinoma (IPMC). METHODS: We included 22 surgically resected IPMCs and 84 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs). Among the IPMC cases, 14 did not undergo EUS-FNA before surgical resection. The diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA was compared between IPMC and PDAC. Additionally, prognosis (relapse-free and overall survival time after resection) and the rate of peritoneal dissemination were compared among IPMC with EUS-FNA, IPMC without EUS-FNA, and PDAC. A survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. RESULTS: (EUS-FNA diagnosis) There were no significant differences in the number of needle passages (PDAC 2.5 vs. IPMC 2.0 passages, P = 0.84) or puncture route (stomach/duodenum: 2/6 vs. 45/39, P = 0.29). However, the correct diagnosis rate was significantly higher in PDAC (92.9%) than in IPMC (62.5%) (P = 0.03). No procedure-related adverse events occurred. Peritoneal lavage cytology performed during the operation was negative in all cases. (Prognosis) Among IPMC with EUS-FNA, IPMC without EUS-FNA, and PDAC, there were no significant differences in relapse-free survival (21.0 vs. 22.4 vs. 12.5 months, respectively; P = 0.64) or overall survival time (35.5 vs. 53.1 vs. 35.9 months, respectively; P = 0.42), and peritoneal dissemination was detected during the observation period in 25%, 28.5%, and 21.4% cases, respectively (P = 0.82). CONCLUSION: Even though a correct diagnosis was more difficult to obtain in IPMC than in PDAC, IPMC allows specimens to be obtained without influencing the rate of recurrence and prognosis. BioMed Central 2018-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6186033/ /pubmed/30314433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4896-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Suzuki, Rei Irie, Hiroki Takagi, Tadayuki Sugimoto, Mitsuru Konno, Naoki Sato, Yuki Watanabe, Ko Nakamura, Jun Marubashi, Shigeru Hikichi, Takuto Ohira, Hiromasa Prognostic influence of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in IPMN-derived invasive adenocarcinoma |
title | Prognostic influence of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in IPMN-derived invasive adenocarcinoma |
title_full | Prognostic influence of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in IPMN-derived invasive adenocarcinoma |
title_fullStr | Prognostic influence of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in IPMN-derived invasive adenocarcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic influence of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in IPMN-derived invasive adenocarcinoma |
title_short | Prognostic influence of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in IPMN-derived invasive adenocarcinoma |
title_sort | prognostic influence of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in ipmn-derived invasive adenocarcinoma |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6186033/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30314433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4896-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT suzukirei prognosticinfluenceofendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationinipmnderivedinvasiveadenocarcinoma AT iriehiroki prognosticinfluenceofendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationinipmnderivedinvasiveadenocarcinoma AT takagitadayuki prognosticinfluenceofendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationinipmnderivedinvasiveadenocarcinoma AT sugimotomitsuru prognosticinfluenceofendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationinipmnderivedinvasiveadenocarcinoma AT konnonaoki prognosticinfluenceofendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationinipmnderivedinvasiveadenocarcinoma AT satoyuki prognosticinfluenceofendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationinipmnderivedinvasiveadenocarcinoma AT watanabeko prognosticinfluenceofendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationinipmnderivedinvasiveadenocarcinoma AT nakamurajun prognosticinfluenceofendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationinipmnderivedinvasiveadenocarcinoma AT marubashishigeru prognosticinfluenceofendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationinipmnderivedinvasiveadenocarcinoma AT hikichitakuto prognosticinfluenceofendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationinipmnderivedinvasiveadenocarcinoma AT ohirahiromasa prognosticinfluenceofendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationinipmnderivedinvasiveadenocarcinoma |