Cargando…
Emergency versus Elective Cervical Cerclage: An Audit of Our First Two Years of Service
One of the biggest obstetric challenges is the diagnosis and management of a short cervix as cervical length has an inverse relationship with risk of preterm birth. A cervical cerclage is a surgical procedure to reduce the risk of preterm birth and can be placed in an elective or emergency setting....
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6186325/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30363980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/2065232 |
_version_ | 1783362841130041344 |
---|---|
author | Vasudeva, N. Reddington, C. Bogdanska, M. De Luca, L. |
author_facet | Vasudeva, N. Reddington, C. Bogdanska, M. De Luca, L. |
author_sort | Vasudeva, N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | One of the biggest obstetric challenges is the diagnosis and management of a short cervix as cervical length has an inverse relationship with risk of preterm birth. A cervical cerclage is a surgical procedure to reduce the risk of preterm birth and can be placed in an elective or emergency setting. This is a retrospective review of cervical cerclages inserted at an outer metropolitan hospital from February 2014 to May 2017. Since the introduction of the service, a total of 43 patients were identified as requiring a cervical cerclage. Four of these patients were transferred to tertiary hospitals. Of the 39 cerclages inserted, 26 were elective and 13 were emergency, placed at a mean gestation of 15.6 and 19.6 weeks. In total, there were 35 live births, 2 stillbirths, and 2 neonatal deaths. The maternal demographics (age, gravidity, parity, and preterm risk factors) were not statistically significant between the two groups. The mean pregnancy prolongation and birthweight was greater in the elective than the emergency group (21.4 versus 14.1 weeks; 3148.2 versus 2447.2 grams). There was no obvious pattern with which patients received antibiotics pre-, intra-, or postoperatively or received a vaginal swab. This audit identified the need for improvements to guidelines to standardise the use of antibiotics and progesterone in women with a cervical cerclage. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6186325 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61863252018-10-24 Emergency versus Elective Cervical Cerclage: An Audit of Our First Two Years of Service Vasudeva, N. Reddington, C. Bogdanska, M. De Luca, L. Biomed Res Int Research Article One of the biggest obstetric challenges is the diagnosis and management of a short cervix as cervical length has an inverse relationship with risk of preterm birth. A cervical cerclage is a surgical procedure to reduce the risk of preterm birth and can be placed in an elective or emergency setting. This is a retrospective review of cervical cerclages inserted at an outer metropolitan hospital from February 2014 to May 2017. Since the introduction of the service, a total of 43 patients were identified as requiring a cervical cerclage. Four of these patients were transferred to tertiary hospitals. Of the 39 cerclages inserted, 26 were elective and 13 were emergency, placed at a mean gestation of 15.6 and 19.6 weeks. In total, there were 35 live births, 2 stillbirths, and 2 neonatal deaths. The maternal demographics (age, gravidity, parity, and preterm risk factors) were not statistically significant between the two groups. The mean pregnancy prolongation and birthweight was greater in the elective than the emergency group (21.4 versus 14.1 weeks; 3148.2 versus 2447.2 grams). There was no obvious pattern with which patients received antibiotics pre-, intra-, or postoperatively or received a vaginal swab. This audit identified the need for improvements to guidelines to standardise the use of antibiotics and progesterone in women with a cervical cerclage. Hindawi 2018-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6186325/ /pubmed/30363980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/2065232 Text en Copyright © 2018 N. Vasudeva et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Vasudeva, N. Reddington, C. Bogdanska, M. De Luca, L. Emergency versus Elective Cervical Cerclage: An Audit of Our First Two Years of Service |
title | Emergency versus Elective Cervical Cerclage: An Audit of Our First Two Years of Service |
title_full | Emergency versus Elective Cervical Cerclage: An Audit of Our First Two Years of Service |
title_fullStr | Emergency versus Elective Cervical Cerclage: An Audit of Our First Two Years of Service |
title_full_unstemmed | Emergency versus Elective Cervical Cerclage: An Audit of Our First Two Years of Service |
title_short | Emergency versus Elective Cervical Cerclage: An Audit of Our First Two Years of Service |
title_sort | emergency versus elective cervical cerclage: an audit of our first two years of service |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6186325/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30363980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/2065232 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vasudevan emergencyversuselectivecervicalcerclageanauditofourfirsttwoyearsofservice AT reddingtonc emergencyversuselectivecervicalcerclageanauditofourfirsttwoyearsofservice AT bogdanskam emergencyversuselectivecervicalcerclageanauditofourfirsttwoyearsofservice AT delucal emergencyversuselectivecervicalcerclageanauditofourfirsttwoyearsofservice |