Cargando…

Emergency versus Elective Cervical Cerclage: An Audit of Our First Two Years of Service

One of the biggest obstetric challenges is the diagnosis and management of a short cervix as cervical length has an inverse relationship with risk of preterm birth. A cervical cerclage is a surgical procedure to reduce the risk of preterm birth and can be placed in an elective or emergency setting....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vasudeva, N., Reddington, C., Bogdanska, M., De Luca, L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6186325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30363980
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/2065232
_version_ 1783362841130041344
author Vasudeva, N.
Reddington, C.
Bogdanska, M.
De Luca, L.
author_facet Vasudeva, N.
Reddington, C.
Bogdanska, M.
De Luca, L.
author_sort Vasudeva, N.
collection PubMed
description One of the biggest obstetric challenges is the diagnosis and management of a short cervix as cervical length has an inverse relationship with risk of preterm birth. A cervical cerclage is a surgical procedure to reduce the risk of preterm birth and can be placed in an elective or emergency setting. This is a retrospective review of cervical cerclages inserted at an outer metropolitan hospital from February 2014 to May 2017. Since the introduction of the service, a total of 43 patients were identified as requiring a cervical cerclage. Four of these patients were transferred to tertiary hospitals. Of the 39 cerclages inserted, 26 were elective and 13 were emergency, placed at a mean gestation of 15.6 and 19.6 weeks. In total, there were 35 live births, 2 stillbirths, and 2 neonatal deaths. The maternal demographics (age, gravidity, parity, and preterm risk factors) were not statistically significant between the two groups. The mean pregnancy prolongation and birthweight was greater in the elective than the emergency group (21.4 versus 14.1 weeks; 3148.2 versus 2447.2 grams). There was no obvious pattern with which patients received antibiotics pre-, intra-, or postoperatively or received a vaginal swab. This audit identified the need for improvements to guidelines to standardise the use of antibiotics and progesterone in women with a cervical cerclage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6186325
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61863252018-10-24 Emergency versus Elective Cervical Cerclage: An Audit of Our First Two Years of Service Vasudeva, N. Reddington, C. Bogdanska, M. De Luca, L. Biomed Res Int Research Article One of the biggest obstetric challenges is the diagnosis and management of a short cervix as cervical length has an inverse relationship with risk of preterm birth. A cervical cerclage is a surgical procedure to reduce the risk of preterm birth and can be placed in an elective or emergency setting. This is a retrospective review of cervical cerclages inserted at an outer metropolitan hospital from February 2014 to May 2017. Since the introduction of the service, a total of 43 patients were identified as requiring a cervical cerclage. Four of these patients were transferred to tertiary hospitals. Of the 39 cerclages inserted, 26 were elective and 13 were emergency, placed at a mean gestation of 15.6 and 19.6 weeks. In total, there were 35 live births, 2 stillbirths, and 2 neonatal deaths. The maternal demographics (age, gravidity, parity, and preterm risk factors) were not statistically significant between the two groups. The mean pregnancy prolongation and birthweight was greater in the elective than the emergency group (21.4 versus 14.1 weeks; 3148.2 versus 2447.2 grams). There was no obvious pattern with which patients received antibiotics pre-, intra-, or postoperatively or received a vaginal swab. This audit identified the need for improvements to guidelines to standardise the use of antibiotics and progesterone in women with a cervical cerclage. Hindawi 2018-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6186325/ /pubmed/30363980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/2065232 Text en Copyright © 2018 N. Vasudeva et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vasudeva, N.
Reddington, C.
Bogdanska, M.
De Luca, L.
Emergency versus Elective Cervical Cerclage: An Audit of Our First Two Years of Service
title Emergency versus Elective Cervical Cerclage: An Audit of Our First Two Years of Service
title_full Emergency versus Elective Cervical Cerclage: An Audit of Our First Two Years of Service
title_fullStr Emergency versus Elective Cervical Cerclage: An Audit of Our First Two Years of Service
title_full_unstemmed Emergency versus Elective Cervical Cerclage: An Audit of Our First Two Years of Service
title_short Emergency versus Elective Cervical Cerclage: An Audit of Our First Two Years of Service
title_sort emergency versus elective cervical cerclage: an audit of our first two years of service
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6186325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30363980
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/2065232
work_keys_str_mv AT vasudevan emergencyversuselectivecervicalcerclageanauditofourfirsttwoyearsofservice
AT reddingtonc emergencyversuselectivecervicalcerclageanauditofourfirsttwoyearsofservice
AT bogdanskam emergencyversuselectivecervicalcerclageanauditofourfirsttwoyearsofservice
AT delucal emergencyversuselectivecervicalcerclageanauditofourfirsttwoyearsofservice