Cargando…
A Partnership Model for Improving Service Delivery in Remote Papua New Guinea: A Mixed Methods Evaluation
Background: The Community Mine Continuation Agreement Middle (CMCA) and South Fly Health Program (the Health Program) is a partnership for improving health service delivery in remote Papua New Guinea (PNG). The Health Program is delivered by a private contractor working in partnership with existing...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Kerman University of Medical Sciences
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6186460/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30316245 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2018.50 |
_version_ | 1783362859731779584 |
---|---|
author | Field, Emma Abo, Dominica Samiak, Louis Vila, Mafu Dove, Georgina Rosewell, Alex Nathan, Sally |
author_facet | Field, Emma Abo, Dominica Samiak, Louis Vila, Mafu Dove, Georgina Rosewell, Alex Nathan, Sally |
author_sort | Field, Emma |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The Community Mine Continuation Agreement Middle (CMCA) and South Fly Health Program (the Health Program) is a partnership for improving health service delivery in remote Papua New Guinea (PNG). The Health Program is delivered by a private contractor working in partnership with existing health service providers to improve service delivery using existing government systems, where possible, and aligns with national policies, plans and strategies. A midline evaluation was conducted to determine changes in health service delivery since commencement of the Health Program. Methods: A mixed methods evaluation was undertaken mid-way through implementation of the Health Program, including a pre/post analysis of health service delivery indicators, semi-structured interviews with health workers and assessment of health facility equipment and infrastructure. Results: Improvements in many of the long-term expected outcomes of the Health Program were observed when compared to the pre-program period. The number of outpatient visits per person per year and number of outreach clinics per 1000 children under 5 years increased by 15% and 189% respectively (P<.001). Increases in vaccination coverage for infants aged <1 year were observed: 58 % for pentavalent 1st dose (P<.001) and 75% for 1st dose Sabin (P<.001), 30% for 3rd dose pentavalent (P<.001) and 26% for measles vaccination (P<.001). Family planning coverage remained at similar levels (increasing 5%, P=.095) and antenatal care coverage increased by 26% (P<.001). Supervised deliveries coverage declined by 32% (P<.001), a continuation of the pre-Program trend. The proportion of facilities with standard equipment items, transport and lighting increased. Health worker training, in particular obstetric training, was most commonly cited by health workers as leading to improved services. Conclusion: Following implementation, substantial improvements in health service delivery indicators were observed in the Health Program area as compared with pre-program period and the stagnating or declining national performance. This model could be considered for similar contexts where existing health service providers require external assistance to provide basic health services to the community |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6186460 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Kerman University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61864602018-10-18 A Partnership Model for Improving Service Delivery in Remote Papua New Guinea: A Mixed Methods Evaluation Field, Emma Abo, Dominica Samiak, Louis Vila, Mafu Dove, Georgina Rosewell, Alex Nathan, Sally Int J Health Policy Manag Original Article Background: The Community Mine Continuation Agreement Middle (CMCA) and South Fly Health Program (the Health Program) is a partnership for improving health service delivery in remote Papua New Guinea (PNG). The Health Program is delivered by a private contractor working in partnership with existing health service providers to improve service delivery using existing government systems, where possible, and aligns with national policies, plans and strategies. A midline evaluation was conducted to determine changes in health service delivery since commencement of the Health Program. Methods: A mixed methods evaluation was undertaken mid-way through implementation of the Health Program, including a pre/post analysis of health service delivery indicators, semi-structured interviews with health workers and assessment of health facility equipment and infrastructure. Results: Improvements in many of the long-term expected outcomes of the Health Program were observed when compared to the pre-program period. The number of outpatient visits per person per year and number of outreach clinics per 1000 children under 5 years increased by 15% and 189% respectively (P<.001). Increases in vaccination coverage for infants aged <1 year were observed: 58 % for pentavalent 1st dose (P<.001) and 75% for 1st dose Sabin (P<.001), 30% for 3rd dose pentavalent (P<.001) and 26% for measles vaccination (P<.001). Family planning coverage remained at similar levels (increasing 5%, P=.095) and antenatal care coverage increased by 26% (P<.001). Supervised deliveries coverage declined by 32% (P<.001), a continuation of the pre-Program trend. The proportion of facilities with standard equipment items, transport and lighting increased. Health worker training, in particular obstetric training, was most commonly cited by health workers as leading to improved services. Conclusion: Following implementation, substantial improvements in health service delivery indicators were observed in the Health Program area as compared with pre-program period and the stagnating or declining national performance. This model could be considered for similar contexts where existing health service providers require external assistance to provide basic health services to the community Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2018-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6186460/ /pubmed/30316245 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2018.50 Text en © 2018 The Author(s); Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Field, Emma Abo, Dominica Samiak, Louis Vila, Mafu Dove, Georgina Rosewell, Alex Nathan, Sally A Partnership Model for Improving Service Delivery in Remote Papua New Guinea: A Mixed Methods Evaluation |
title | A Partnership Model for Improving Service Delivery in Remote Papua New Guinea: A Mixed Methods Evaluation |
title_full | A Partnership Model for Improving Service Delivery in Remote Papua New Guinea: A Mixed Methods Evaluation |
title_fullStr | A Partnership Model for Improving Service Delivery in Remote Papua New Guinea: A Mixed Methods Evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | A Partnership Model for Improving Service Delivery in Remote Papua New Guinea: A Mixed Methods Evaluation |
title_short | A Partnership Model for Improving Service Delivery in Remote Papua New Guinea: A Mixed Methods Evaluation |
title_sort | partnership model for improving service delivery in remote papua new guinea: a mixed methods evaluation |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6186460/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30316245 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2018.50 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fieldemma apartnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation AT abodominica apartnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation AT samiaklouis apartnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation AT vilamafu apartnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation AT dovegeorgina apartnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation AT rosewellalex apartnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation AT nathansally apartnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation AT fieldemma partnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation AT abodominica partnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation AT samiaklouis partnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation AT vilamafu partnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation AT dovegeorgina partnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation AT rosewellalex partnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation AT nathansally partnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation |