Cargando…

A Partnership Model for Improving Service Delivery in Remote Papua New Guinea: A Mixed Methods Evaluation

Background: The Community Mine Continuation Agreement Middle (CMCA) and South Fly Health Program (the Health Program) is a partnership for improving health service delivery in remote Papua New Guinea (PNG). The Health Program is delivered by a private contractor working in partnership with existing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Field, Emma, Abo, Dominica, Samiak, Louis, Vila, Mafu, Dove, Georgina, Rosewell, Alex, Nathan, Sally
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6186460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30316245
http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2018.50
_version_ 1783362859731779584
author Field, Emma
Abo, Dominica
Samiak, Louis
Vila, Mafu
Dove, Georgina
Rosewell, Alex
Nathan, Sally
author_facet Field, Emma
Abo, Dominica
Samiak, Louis
Vila, Mafu
Dove, Georgina
Rosewell, Alex
Nathan, Sally
author_sort Field, Emma
collection PubMed
description Background: The Community Mine Continuation Agreement Middle (CMCA) and South Fly Health Program (the Health Program) is a partnership for improving health service delivery in remote Papua New Guinea (PNG). The Health Program is delivered by a private contractor working in partnership with existing health service providers to improve service delivery using existing government systems, where possible, and aligns with national policies, plans and strategies. A midline evaluation was conducted to determine changes in health service delivery since commencement of the Health Program. Methods: A mixed methods evaluation was undertaken mid-way through implementation of the Health Program, including a pre/post analysis of health service delivery indicators, semi-structured interviews with health workers and assessment of health facility equipment and infrastructure. Results: Improvements in many of the long-term expected outcomes of the Health Program were observed when compared to the pre-program period. The number of outpatient visits per person per year and number of outreach clinics per 1000 children under 5 years increased by 15% and 189% respectively (P<.001). Increases in vaccination coverage for infants aged <1 year were observed: 58 % for pentavalent 1st dose (P<.001) and 75% for 1st dose Sabin (P<.001), 30% for 3rd dose pentavalent (P<.001) and 26% for measles vaccination (P<.001). Family planning coverage remained at similar levels (increasing 5%, P=.095) and antenatal care coverage increased by 26% (P<.001). Supervised deliveries coverage declined by 32% (P<.001), a continuation of the pre-Program trend. The proportion of facilities with standard equipment items, transport and lighting increased. Health worker training, in particular obstetric training, was most commonly cited by health workers as leading to improved services. Conclusion: Following implementation, substantial improvements in health service delivery indicators were observed in the Health Program area as compared with pre-program period and the stagnating or declining national performance. This model could be considered for similar contexts where existing health service providers require external assistance to provide basic health services to the community
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6186460
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Kerman University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61864602018-10-18 A Partnership Model for Improving Service Delivery in Remote Papua New Guinea: A Mixed Methods Evaluation Field, Emma Abo, Dominica Samiak, Louis Vila, Mafu Dove, Georgina Rosewell, Alex Nathan, Sally Int J Health Policy Manag Original Article Background: The Community Mine Continuation Agreement Middle (CMCA) and South Fly Health Program (the Health Program) is a partnership for improving health service delivery in remote Papua New Guinea (PNG). The Health Program is delivered by a private contractor working in partnership with existing health service providers to improve service delivery using existing government systems, where possible, and aligns with national policies, plans and strategies. A midline evaluation was conducted to determine changes in health service delivery since commencement of the Health Program. Methods: A mixed methods evaluation was undertaken mid-way through implementation of the Health Program, including a pre/post analysis of health service delivery indicators, semi-structured interviews with health workers and assessment of health facility equipment and infrastructure. Results: Improvements in many of the long-term expected outcomes of the Health Program were observed when compared to the pre-program period. The number of outpatient visits per person per year and number of outreach clinics per 1000 children under 5 years increased by 15% and 189% respectively (P<.001). Increases in vaccination coverage for infants aged <1 year were observed: 58 % for pentavalent 1st dose (P<.001) and 75% for 1st dose Sabin (P<.001), 30% for 3rd dose pentavalent (P<.001) and 26% for measles vaccination (P<.001). Family planning coverage remained at similar levels (increasing 5%, P=.095) and antenatal care coverage increased by 26% (P<.001). Supervised deliveries coverage declined by 32% (P<.001), a continuation of the pre-Program trend. The proportion of facilities with standard equipment items, transport and lighting increased. Health worker training, in particular obstetric training, was most commonly cited by health workers as leading to improved services. Conclusion: Following implementation, substantial improvements in health service delivery indicators were observed in the Health Program area as compared with pre-program period and the stagnating or declining national performance. This model could be considered for similar contexts where existing health service providers require external assistance to provide basic health services to the community Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2018-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6186460/ /pubmed/30316245 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2018.50 Text en © 2018 The Author(s); Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Field, Emma
Abo, Dominica
Samiak, Louis
Vila, Mafu
Dove, Georgina
Rosewell, Alex
Nathan, Sally
A Partnership Model for Improving Service Delivery in Remote Papua New Guinea: A Mixed Methods Evaluation
title A Partnership Model for Improving Service Delivery in Remote Papua New Guinea: A Mixed Methods Evaluation
title_full A Partnership Model for Improving Service Delivery in Remote Papua New Guinea: A Mixed Methods Evaluation
title_fullStr A Partnership Model for Improving Service Delivery in Remote Papua New Guinea: A Mixed Methods Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed A Partnership Model for Improving Service Delivery in Remote Papua New Guinea: A Mixed Methods Evaluation
title_short A Partnership Model for Improving Service Delivery in Remote Papua New Guinea: A Mixed Methods Evaluation
title_sort partnership model for improving service delivery in remote papua new guinea: a mixed methods evaluation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6186460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30316245
http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2018.50
work_keys_str_mv AT fieldemma apartnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation
AT abodominica apartnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation
AT samiaklouis apartnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation
AT vilamafu apartnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation
AT dovegeorgina apartnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation
AT rosewellalex apartnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation
AT nathansally apartnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation
AT fieldemma partnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation
AT abodominica partnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation
AT samiaklouis partnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation
AT vilamafu partnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation
AT dovegeorgina partnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation
AT rosewellalex partnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation
AT nathansally partnershipmodelforimprovingservicedeliveryinremotepapuanewguineaamixedmethodsevaluation