Cargando…

AB078. Does the interval from prostate biopsy to robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) influence the difficulty of the operation? —a retrospective single-surgeon analysis based on segmented operative time

BACKGROUND: To evaluate whether the interval from prostate biopsy to radical prostatectomy (interval), number of biopsy cores and biopsy approach affect the difficulty of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP). METHODS: A total of 209 patients with localized and locally advanced pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Rui, Sun, Yinghao, Feng, Xiang, Lv, Chen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6186742/
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2018.AB078
_version_ 1783362893784285184
author Chen, Rui
Sun, Yinghao
Feng, Xiang
Lv, Chen
author_facet Chen, Rui
Sun, Yinghao
Feng, Xiang
Lv, Chen
author_sort Chen, Rui
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To evaluate whether the interval from prostate biopsy to radical prostatectomy (interval), number of biopsy cores and biopsy approach affect the difficulty of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP). METHODS: A total of 209 patients with localized and locally advanced prostate cancer who underwent RALP from January 2016 to September 2017 in Shanghai Changhai hospital were enrolled. All surgeries were performed by a single surgeon with experience of over 300 cases. The operative time was divided into seven periods based on eight relatively stable checkpoints based on prospectively recorded surgical videos. Total operative time and segmented operative time were recorded. Interval was categorized as <2, 2 to 4, 4 to 6, 6 to 8, and >8 weeks. Univariate analysis and multivariate linear regression analysis were applied. RESULTS: Higher body mass index (BMI), larger prostate volume and lymph node dissection (all P≤0.05) were independent predictors of longer total operative time. There was no clinically significant difference of operative time among Interval groups by multivariate linear regression analysis. But Interval was associated with operative time of step 5 in univariate analysis, in which operative time of the group with Interval less than 2 weeks was significantly longer than that of the other groups (P=0.010). CONCLUSIONS: For an experienced surgeon, the interval from biopsy to RALP was not clinically associated with segmented operative time. Our results indicated that experienced surgeons may perform the operation before the traditionally recommend interval of 6 to 8 weeks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6186742
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61867422018-10-26 AB078. Does the interval from prostate biopsy to robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) influence the difficulty of the operation? —a retrospective single-surgeon analysis based on segmented operative time Chen, Rui Sun, Yinghao Feng, Xiang Lv, Chen Transl Androl Urol Printed Abstract BACKGROUND: To evaluate whether the interval from prostate biopsy to radical prostatectomy (interval), number of biopsy cores and biopsy approach affect the difficulty of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP). METHODS: A total of 209 patients with localized and locally advanced prostate cancer who underwent RALP from January 2016 to September 2017 in Shanghai Changhai hospital were enrolled. All surgeries were performed by a single surgeon with experience of over 300 cases. The operative time was divided into seven periods based on eight relatively stable checkpoints based on prospectively recorded surgical videos. Total operative time and segmented operative time were recorded. Interval was categorized as <2, 2 to 4, 4 to 6, 6 to 8, and >8 weeks. Univariate analysis and multivariate linear regression analysis were applied. RESULTS: Higher body mass index (BMI), larger prostate volume and lymph node dissection (all P≤0.05) were independent predictors of longer total operative time. There was no clinically significant difference of operative time among Interval groups by multivariate linear regression analysis. But Interval was associated with operative time of step 5 in univariate analysis, in which operative time of the group with Interval less than 2 weeks was significantly longer than that of the other groups (P=0.010). CONCLUSIONS: For an experienced surgeon, the interval from biopsy to RALP was not clinically associated with segmented operative time. Our results indicated that experienced surgeons may perform the operation before the traditionally recommend interval of 6 to 8 weeks. AME Publishing Company 2018-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6186742/ http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2018.AB078 Text en 2018 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved.
spellingShingle Printed Abstract
Chen, Rui
Sun, Yinghao
Feng, Xiang
Lv, Chen
AB078. Does the interval from prostate biopsy to robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) influence the difficulty of the operation? —a retrospective single-surgeon analysis based on segmented operative time
title AB078. Does the interval from prostate biopsy to robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) influence the difficulty of the operation? —a retrospective single-surgeon analysis based on segmented operative time
title_full AB078. Does the interval from prostate biopsy to robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) influence the difficulty of the operation? —a retrospective single-surgeon analysis based on segmented operative time
title_fullStr AB078. Does the interval from prostate biopsy to robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) influence the difficulty of the operation? —a retrospective single-surgeon analysis based on segmented operative time
title_full_unstemmed AB078. Does the interval from prostate biopsy to robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) influence the difficulty of the operation? —a retrospective single-surgeon analysis based on segmented operative time
title_short AB078. Does the interval from prostate biopsy to robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) influence the difficulty of the operation? —a retrospective single-surgeon analysis based on segmented operative time
title_sort ab078. does the interval from prostate biopsy to robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (ralp) influence the difficulty of the operation? —a retrospective single-surgeon analysis based on segmented operative time
topic Printed Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6186742/
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2018.AB078
work_keys_str_mv AT chenrui ab078doestheintervalfromprostatebiopsytorobotassistedlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomyralpinfluencethedifficultyoftheoperationaretrospectivesinglesurgeonanalysisbasedonsegmentedoperativetime
AT sunyinghao ab078doestheintervalfromprostatebiopsytorobotassistedlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomyralpinfluencethedifficultyoftheoperationaretrospectivesinglesurgeonanalysisbasedonsegmentedoperativetime
AT fengxiang ab078doestheintervalfromprostatebiopsytorobotassistedlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomyralpinfluencethedifficultyoftheoperationaretrospectivesinglesurgeonanalysisbasedonsegmentedoperativetime
AT lvchen ab078doestheintervalfromprostatebiopsytorobotassistedlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomyralpinfluencethedifficultyoftheoperationaretrospectivesinglesurgeonanalysisbasedonsegmentedoperativetime