Cargando…

Data on spot–kits versus titration method for iodine determination in salt: Performance and validity

The aim of this data is comparison of achieved data from salt iodine measurement by titration method with using sodium thiosulfate in presence of lugol׳s reagent and commercial spot- kit. Titration measurement was carried out in two different laboratories using standard samples. 437 samples includin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shamsollahi, Hamid Reza, Rastkari, Noushin, Nadarloo, Maryam, Hosseini, Sara Sadat, sheikhi, Razieh, Nabizadeh, Ramin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6187014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30338281
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2018.10.001
Descripción
Sumario:The aim of this data is comparison of achieved data from salt iodine measurement by titration method with using sodium thiosulfate in presence of lugol׳s reagent and commercial spot- kit. Titration measurement was carried out in two different laboratories using standard samples. 437 samples including 20 commercial brands were collected throughout Iran. The iodine contents of the samples were measured by both the titration method and two most frequently used spot-kit brands in Iran. There is no significant differences between the results obtained from the two brands of spot-kits (ICC = 0.797). The kits sensitivity for determination of negative samples was high (more than 0.9) but by increasing the iodine concentration up to 15 ppm, the kits’ sensitivity was decreased. These findings indicate that the titration method is necessary for quantitative purposes, especially for concentrations higher than 30 ppm. However, spot-kits are suitable for qualitative and semi-quantitative measurements.