Cargando…
Epiphyte type and sampling height impact mesofauna communities in Douglas-fir trees
Branches and boles of trees in wet forests are often carpeted with lichens and bryophytes capable of providing periodically saturated habitat suitable for microfauna, animals that include tardigrades, rotifers, nematodes, mites, and springtails. Although resident microfauna likely exhibit habitat pr...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6187993/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30345168 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5699 |
_version_ | 1783363133735174144 |
---|---|
author | Young, Alexander R. Miller, Jesse E.D. Villella, John Carey, Greg Miller, William R. |
author_facet | Young, Alexander R. Miller, Jesse E.D. Villella, John Carey, Greg Miller, William R. |
author_sort | Young, Alexander R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Branches and boles of trees in wet forests are often carpeted with lichens and bryophytes capable of providing periodically saturated habitat suitable for microfauna, animals that include tardigrades, rotifers, nematodes, mites, and springtails. Although resident microfauna likely exhibit habitat preferences structured by fine-scale environmental factors, previous studies rarely report associations between microfaunal communities and habitat type (e.g., communities that develop in lichens vs. bryophytes). Microfaunal communities were examined across three types of epiphyte and three sampling heights to capture gradients of microenvironment. Tardigrades, rotifers, and nematodes were significantly more abundant in bryophytes than fruticose lichen or foliose lichen. Eight tardigrade species and four tardigrade taxa were found, representing two classes, three orders, six families, and eight genera. Tardigrade community composition was significantly different between bryophytes, foliose lichen, fruticose lichen, and sampling heights. We show that microenvironmental factors including epiphyte type and sampling height shape microfaunal communities and may mirror the environmental preferences of their epiphyte hosts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6187993 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61879932018-10-19 Epiphyte type and sampling height impact mesofauna communities in Douglas-fir trees Young, Alexander R. Miller, Jesse E.D. Villella, John Carey, Greg Miller, William R. PeerJ Biodiversity Branches and boles of trees in wet forests are often carpeted with lichens and bryophytes capable of providing periodically saturated habitat suitable for microfauna, animals that include tardigrades, rotifers, nematodes, mites, and springtails. Although resident microfauna likely exhibit habitat preferences structured by fine-scale environmental factors, previous studies rarely report associations between microfaunal communities and habitat type (e.g., communities that develop in lichens vs. bryophytes). Microfaunal communities were examined across three types of epiphyte and three sampling heights to capture gradients of microenvironment. Tardigrades, rotifers, and nematodes were significantly more abundant in bryophytes than fruticose lichen or foliose lichen. Eight tardigrade species and four tardigrade taxa were found, representing two classes, three orders, six families, and eight genera. Tardigrade community composition was significantly different between bryophytes, foliose lichen, fruticose lichen, and sampling heights. We show that microenvironmental factors including epiphyte type and sampling height shape microfaunal communities and may mirror the environmental preferences of their epiphyte hosts. PeerJ Inc. 2018-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6187993/ /pubmed/30345168 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5699 Text en ©2018 Young et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Biodiversity Young, Alexander R. Miller, Jesse E.D. Villella, John Carey, Greg Miller, William R. Epiphyte type and sampling height impact mesofauna communities in Douglas-fir trees |
title | Epiphyte type and sampling height impact mesofauna communities in Douglas-fir trees |
title_full | Epiphyte type and sampling height impact mesofauna communities in Douglas-fir trees |
title_fullStr | Epiphyte type and sampling height impact mesofauna communities in Douglas-fir trees |
title_full_unstemmed | Epiphyte type and sampling height impact mesofauna communities in Douglas-fir trees |
title_short | Epiphyte type and sampling height impact mesofauna communities in Douglas-fir trees |
title_sort | epiphyte type and sampling height impact mesofauna communities in douglas-fir trees |
topic | Biodiversity |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6187993/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30345168 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5699 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT youngalexanderr epiphytetypeandsamplingheightimpactmesofaunacommunitiesindouglasfirtrees AT millerjesseed epiphytetypeandsamplingheightimpactmesofaunacommunitiesindouglasfirtrees AT villellajohn epiphytetypeandsamplingheightimpactmesofaunacommunitiesindouglasfirtrees AT careygreg epiphytetypeandsamplingheightimpactmesofaunacommunitiesindouglasfirtrees AT millerwilliamr epiphytetypeandsamplingheightimpactmesofaunacommunitiesindouglasfirtrees |