Cargando…

Epiphyte type and sampling height impact mesofauna communities in Douglas-fir trees

Branches and boles of trees in wet forests are often carpeted with lichens and bryophytes capable of providing periodically saturated habitat suitable for microfauna, animals that include tardigrades, rotifers, nematodes, mites, and springtails. Although resident microfauna likely exhibit habitat pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Young, Alexander R., Miller, Jesse E.D., Villella, John, Carey, Greg, Miller, William R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6187993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30345168
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5699
_version_ 1783363133735174144
author Young, Alexander R.
Miller, Jesse E.D.
Villella, John
Carey, Greg
Miller, William R.
author_facet Young, Alexander R.
Miller, Jesse E.D.
Villella, John
Carey, Greg
Miller, William R.
author_sort Young, Alexander R.
collection PubMed
description Branches and boles of trees in wet forests are often carpeted with lichens and bryophytes capable of providing periodically saturated habitat suitable for microfauna, animals that include tardigrades, rotifers, nematodes, mites, and springtails. Although resident microfauna likely exhibit habitat preferences structured by fine-scale environmental factors, previous studies rarely report associations between microfaunal communities and habitat type (e.g., communities that develop in lichens vs. bryophytes). Microfaunal communities were examined across three types of epiphyte and three sampling heights to capture gradients of microenvironment. Tardigrades, rotifers, and nematodes were significantly more abundant in bryophytes than fruticose lichen or foliose lichen. Eight tardigrade species and four tardigrade taxa were found, representing two classes, three orders, six families, and eight genera. Tardigrade community composition was significantly different between bryophytes, foliose lichen, fruticose lichen, and sampling heights. We show that microenvironmental factors including epiphyte type and sampling height shape microfaunal communities and may mirror the environmental preferences of their epiphyte hosts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6187993
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61879932018-10-19 Epiphyte type and sampling height impact mesofauna communities in Douglas-fir trees Young, Alexander R. Miller, Jesse E.D. Villella, John Carey, Greg Miller, William R. PeerJ Biodiversity Branches and boles of trees in wet forests are often carpeted with lichens and bryophytes capable of providing periodically saturated habitat suitable for microfauna, animals that include tardigrades, rotifers, nematodes, mites, and springtails. Although resident microfauna likely exhibit habitat preferences structured by fine-scale environmental factors, previous studies rarely report associations between microfaunal communities and habitat type (e.g., communities that develop in lichens vs. bryophytes). Microfaunal communities were examined across three types of epiphyte and three sampling heights to capture gradients of microenvironment. Tardigrades, rotifers, and nematodes were significantly more abundant in bryophytes than fruticose lichen or foliose lichen. Eight tardigrade species and four tardigrade taxa were found, representing two classes, three orders, six families, and eight genera. Tardigrade community composition was significantly different between bryophytes, foliose lichen, fruticose lichen, and sampling heights. We show that microenvironmental factors including epiphyte type and sampling height shape microfaunal communities and may mirror the environmental preferences of their epiphyte hosts. PeerJ Inc. 2018-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6187993/ /pubmed/30345168 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5699 Text en ©2018 Young et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Biodiversity
Young, Alexander R.
Miller, Jesse E.D.
Villella, John
Carey, Greg
Miller, William R.
Epiphyte type and sampling height impact mesofauna communities in Douglas-fir trees
title Epiphyte type and sampling height impact mesofauna communities in Douglas-fir trees
title_full Epiphyte type and sampling height impact mesofauna communities in Douglas-fir trees
title_fullStr Epiphyte type and sampling height impact mesofauna communities in Douglas-fir trees
title_full_unstemmed Epiphyte type and sampling height impact mesofauna communities in Douglas-fir trees
title_short Epiphyte type and sampling height impact mesofauna communities in Douglas-fir trees
title_sort epiphyte type and sampling height impact mesofauna communities in douglas-fir trees
topic Biodiversity
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6187993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30345168
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5699
work_keys_str_mv AT youngalexanderr epiphytetypeandsamplingheightimpactmesofaunacommunitiesindouglasfirtrees
AT millerjesseed epiphytetypeandsamplingheightimpactmesofaunacommunitiesindouglasfirtrees
AT villellajohn epiphytetypeandsamplingheightimpactmesofaunacommunitiesindouglasfirtrees
AT careygreg epiphytetypeandsamplingheightimpactmesofaunacommunitiesindouglasfirtrees
AT millerwilliamr epiphytetypeandsamplingheightimpactmesofaunacommunitiesindouglasfirtrees