Cargando…
Efficacy of Gastric Electrical Stimulation for Gastroparesis: US/European Comparison
BACKGROUND: Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) is used in both the US and Europe, but little research has investigated the demographics of gastroparesis patients receiving GES by geographic location. METHODS: We compared data from 380 patients, 296 female and 84 males, mean age 42 years, 246 idiop...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elmer Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6188037/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30344806 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/gr1061w |
_version_ | 1783363144370880512 |
---|---|
author | Burlen, Jordan Runnels, Matt Mehta, Minesh Andersson, Stina Ducrotte, Philippe Gourcerol, Guillaume Lindberg, Greger Fullarton, Greg Abrahamsson, Hasse Al-Juburi, Amar Lahr, Chris Rashed, Hani Abell, Thomas |
author_facet | Burlen, Jordan Runnels, Matt Mehta, Minesh Andersson, Stina Ducrotte, Philippe Gourcerol, Guillaume Lindberg, Greger Fullarton, Greg Abrahamsson, Hasse Al-Juburi, Amar Lahr, Chris Rashed, Hani Abell, Thomas |
author_sort | Burlen, Jordan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) is used in both the US and Europe, but little research has investigated the demographics of gastroparesis patients receiving GES by geographic location. METHODS: We compared data from 380 patients, 296 female and 84 males, mean age 42 years, 246 idiopathic (ID), 107 diabetic (DM), and 27 post-surgical (PS). The statistical significance was calculated by Chi-square test and a P-value obtained for ID, DM, and PS. The statistical significance was calculated by Fischer exact test and a P-value obtained comparing male vs. female. RESULTS: European centers had 61 GES patients compared to 319 from the US. In Europe, 100% of patients had gastric emptying test (GET) values available; in the US, it was 75% of patients. European centers had more DM patients (59%) than the US (22%), and a smaller proportion of ID patients (25%) than the US (72%). There was a statistical difference between the causes of gastroparesis in the patients receiving GES (P-value < 0.00001). There was also significant difference in the gender of the patients receiving GES, with a greater proportion of women in the US (P value = 0.0023). CONCLUSIONS: Comparing GES in US vs. Europe demonstrated significant differences in gastroparesis demographics and percentage of patients with GET data. After analyzing the previously discussed results and reviewing recent updates in evidence-based medicine guidelines, the discrepancy and variance in patient populations in the US and Europe emphasizes the need for a database that allows better analysis and treatment of gastroparesis patients worldwide including stimulation therapies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6188037 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Elmer Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61880372018-10-19 Efficacy of Gastric Electrical Stimulation for Gastroparesis: US/European Comparison Burlen, Jordan Runnels, Matt Mehta, Minesh Andersson, Stina Ducrotte, Philippe Gourcerol, Guillaume Lindberg, Greger Fullarton, Greg Abrahamsson, Hasse Al-Juburi, Amar Lahr, Chris Rashed, Hani Abell, Thomas Gastroenterology Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) is used in both the US and Europe, but little research has investigated the demographics of gastroparesis patients receiving GES by geographic location. METHODS: We compared data from 380 patients, 296 female and 84 males, mean age 42 years, 246 idiopathic (ID), 107 diabetic (DM), and 27 post-surgical (PS). The statistical significance was calculated by Chi-square test and a P-value obtained for ID, DM, and PS. The statistical significance was calculated by Fischer exact test and a P-value obtained comparing male vs. female. RESULTS: European centers had 61 GES patients compared to 319 from the US. In Europe, 100% of patients had gastric emptying test (GET) values available; in the US, it was 75% of patients. European centers had more DM patients (59%) than the US (22%), and a smaller proportion of ID patients (25%) than the US (72%). There was a statistical difference between the causes of gastroparesis in the patients receiving GES (P-value < 0.00001). There was also significant difference in the gender of the patients receiving GES, with a greater proportion of women in the US (P value = 0.0023). CONCLUSIONS: Comparing GES in US vs. Europe demonstrated significant differences in gastroparesis demographics and percentage of patients with GET data. After analyzing the previously discussed results and reviewing recent updates in evidence-based medicine guidelines, the discrepancy and variance in patient populations in the US and Europe emphasizes the need for a database that allows better analysis and treatment of gastroparesis patients worldwide including stimulation therapies. Elmer Press 2018-10 2018-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6188037/ /pubmed/30344806 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/gr1061w Text en Copyright 2018, Burlen et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Burlen, Jordan Runnels, Matt Mehta, Minesh Andersson, Stina Ducrotte, Philippe Gourcerol, Guillaume Lindberg, Greger Fullarton, Greg Abrahamsson, Hasse Al-Juburi, Amar Lahr, Chris Rashed, Hani Abell, Thomas Efficacy of Gastric Electrical Stimulation for Gastroparesis: US/European Comparison |
title | Efficacy of Gastric Electrical Stimulation for Gastroparesis: US/European Comparison |
title_full | Efficacy of Gastric Electrical Stimulation for Gastroparesis: US/European Comparison |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of Gastric Electrical Stimulation for Gastroparesis: US/European Comparison |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of Gastric Electrical Stimulation for Gastroparesis: US/European Comparison |
title_short | Efficacy of Gastric Electrical Stimulation for Gastroparesis: US/European Comparison |
title_sort | efficacy of gastric electrical stimulation for gastroparesis: us/european comparison |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6188037/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30344806 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/gr1061w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT burlenjordan efficacyofgastricelectricalstimulationforgastroparesisuseuropeancomparison AT runnelsmatt efficacyofgastricelectricalstimulationforgastroparesisuseuropeancomparison AT mehtaminesh efficacyofgastricelectricalstimulationforgastroparesisuseuropeancomparison AT anderssonstina efficacyofgastricelectricalstimulationforgastroparesisuseuropeancomparison AT ducrottephilippe efficacyofgastricelectricalstimulationforgastroparesisuseuropeancomparison AT gourcerolguillaume efficacyofgastricelectricalstimulationforgastroparesisuseuropeancomparison AT lindberggreger efficacyofgastricelectricalstimulationforgastroparesisuseuropeancomparison AT fullartongreg efficacyofgastricelectricalstimulationforgastroparesisuseuropeancomparison AT abrahamssonhasse efficacyofgastricelectricalstimulationforgastroparesisuseuropeancomparison AT aljuburiamar efficacyofgastricelectricalstimulationforgastroparesisuseuropeancomparison AT lahrchris efficacyofgastricelectricalstimulationforgastroparesisuseuropeancomparison AT rashedhani efficacyofgastricelectricalstimulationforgastroparesisuseuropeancomparison AT abellthomas efficacyofgastricelectricalstimulationforgastroparesisuseuropeancomparison |