Cargando…
Biased Inference of Selection Due to GC-Biased Gene Conversion and the Rate of Protein Evolution in Flycatchers When Accounting for It
The rate of recombination impacts on rates of protein evolution for at least two reasons: it affects the efficacy of selection due to linkage and influences sequence evolution through the process of GC-biased gene conversion (gBGC). We studied how recombination, via gBGC, affects inferences of selec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6188562/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30085180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy149 |
_version_ | 1783363203372154880 |
---|---|
author | Bolívar, Paulina Mugal, Carina F Rossi, Matteo Nater, Alexander Wang, Mi Dutoit, Ludovic Ellegren, Hans |
author_facet | Bolívar, Paulina Mugal, Carina F Rossi, Matteo Nater, Alexander Wang, Mi Dutoit, Ludovic Ellegren, Hans |
author_sort | Bolívar, Paulina |
collection | PubMed |
description | The rate of recombination impacts on rates of protein evolution for at least two reasons: it affects the efficacy of selection due to linkage and influences sequence evolution through the process of GC-biased gene conversion (gBGC). We studied how recombination, via gBGC, affects inferences of selection in gene sequences using comparative genomic and population genomic data from the collared flycatcher (Ficedula albicollis). We separately analyzed different mutation categories (“strong”-to-“weak,” “weak-to-strong,” and GC-conservative changes) and found that gBGC impacts on the distribution of fitness effects of new mutations, and leads to that the rate of adaptive evolution and the proportion of adaptive mutations among nonsynonymous substitutions are underestimated by 22–33%. It also biases inferences of demographic history based on the site frequency spectrum. In light of this impact, we suggest that inferences of selection (and demography) in lineages with pronounced gBGC should be based on GC-conservative changes only. Doing so, we estimate that 10% of nonsynonymous mutations are effectively neutral and that 27% of nonsynonymous substitutions have been fixed by positive selection in the flycatcher lineage. We also find that gene expression level, sex-bias in expression, and the number of protein–protein interactions, but not Hill–Robertson interference (HRI), are strong determinants of selective constraint and rate of adaptation of collared flycatcher genes. This study therefore illustrates the importance of disentangling the effects of different evolutionary forces and genetic factors in interpretation of sequence data, and from that infer the role of natural selection in DNA sequence evolution. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6188562 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61885622018-10-22 Biased Inference of Selection Due to GC-Biased Gene Conversion and the Rate of Protein Evolution in Flycatchers When Accounting for It Bolívar, Paulina Mugal, Carina F Rossi, Matteo Nater, Alexander Wang, Mi Dutoit, Ludovic Ellegren, Hans Mol Biol Evol Discoveries The rate of recombination impacts on rates of protein evolution for at least two reasons: it affects the efficacy of selection due to linkage and influences sequence evolution through the process of GC-biased gene conversion (gBGC). We studied how recombination, via gBGC, affects inferences of selection in gene sequences using comparative genomic and population genomic data from the collared flycatcher (Ficedula albicollis). We separately analyzed different mutation categories (“strong”-to-“weak,” “weak-to-strong,” and GC-conservative changes) and found that gBGC impacts on the distribution of fitness effects of new mutations, and leads to that the rate of adaptive evolution and the proportion of adaptive mutations among nonsynonymous substitutions are underestimated by 22–33%. It also biases inferences of demographic history based on the site frequency spectrum. In light of this impact, we suggest that inferences of selection (and demography) in lineages with pronounced gBGC should be based on GC-conservative changes only. Doing so, we estimate that 10% of nonsynonymous mutations are effectively neutral and that 27% of nonsynonymous substitutions have been fixed by positive selection in the flycatcher lineage. We also find that gene expression level, sex-bias in expression, and the number of protein–protein interactions, but not Hill–Robertson interference (HRI), are strong determinants of selective constraint and rate of adaptation of collared flycatcher genes. This study therefore illustrates the importance of disentangling the effects of different evolutionary forces and genetic factors in interpretation of sequence data, and from that infer the role of natural selection in DNA sequence evolution. Oxford University Press 2018-10 2018-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6188562/ /pubmed/30085180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy149 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Discoveries Bolívar, Paulina Mugal, Carina F Rossi, Matteo Nater, Alexander Wang, Mi Dutoit, Ludovic Ellegren, Hans Biased Inference of Selection Due to GC-Biased Gene Conversion and the Rate of Protein Evolution in Flycatchers When Accounting for It |
title | Biased Inference of Selection Due to GC-Biased Gene Conversion and the Rate of Protein Evolution in Flycatchers When Accounting for It |
title_full | Biased Inference of Selection Due to GC-Biased Gene Conversion and the Rate of Protein Evolution in Flycatchers When Accounting for It |
title_fullStr | Biased Inference of Selection Due to GC-Biased Gene Conversion and the Rate of Protein Evolution in Flycatchers When Accounting for It |
title_full_unstemmed | Biased Inference of Selection Due to GC-Biased Gene Conversion and the Rate of Protein Evolution in Flycatchers When Accounting for It |
title_short | Biased Inference of Selection Due to GC-Biased Gene Conversion and the Rate of Protein Evolution in Flycatchers When Accounting for It |
title_sort | biased inference of selection due to gc-biased gene conversion and the rate of protein evolution in flycatchers when accounting for it |
topic | Discoveries |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6188562/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30085180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy149 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bolivarpaulina biasedinferenceofselectionduetogcbiasedgeneconversionandtherateofproteinevolutioninflycatcherswhenaccountingforit AT mugalcarinaf biasedinferenceofselectionduetogcbiasedgeneconversionandtherateofproteinevolutioninflycatcherswhenaccountingforit AT rossimatteo biasedinferenceofselectionduetogcbiasedgeneconversionandtherateofproteinevolutioninflycatcherswhenaccountingforit AT nateralexander biasedinferenceofselectionduetogcbiasedgeneconversionandtherateofproteinevolutioninflycatcherswhenaccountingforit AT wangmi biasedinferenceofselectionduetogcbiasedgeneconversionandtherateofproteinevolutioninflycatcherswhenaccountingforit AT dutoitludovic biasedinferenceofselectionduetogcbiasedgeneconversionandtherateofproteinevolutioninflycatcherswhenaccountingforit AT ellegrenhans biasedinferenceofselectionduetogcbiasedgeneconversionandtherateofproteinevolutioninflycatcherswhenaccountingforit |