Cargando…

Comparative performance of IDEXX SDMA Test and the DLD SDMA ELISA for the measurement of SDMA in canine and feline serum

Kidney disease is common in companion animals, and traditionally diagnosed with serum creatinine concentration (sCr), blood urea nitrogen, and abnormal urinalysis findings. Symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA) is a novel kidney biomarker that reflects glomerular filtration rate, increasing earlier than...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ernst, Rie, Ogeer, Jennifer, McCrann, Donald, Cross, Julie, Strong-Townsend, Marilyn, Friis, Hanne, Coyne, Michael, Clements, Celeste, Drake, Corie, Murphy, Rachel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6188631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30321185
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205030
_version_ 1783363219713163264
author Ernst, Rie
Ogeer, Jennifer
McCrann, Donald
Cross, Julie
Strong-Townsend, Marilyn
Friis, Hanne
Coyne, Michael
Clements, Celeste
Drake, Corie
Murphy, Rachel
author_facet Ernst, Rie
Ogeer, Jennifer
McCrann, Donald
Cross, Julie
Strong-Townsend, Marilyn
Friis, Hanne
Coyne, Michael
Clements, Celeste
Drake, Corie
Murphy, Rachel
author_sort Ernst, Rie
collection PubMed
description Kidney disease is common in companion animals, and traditionally diagnosed with serum creatinine concentration (sCr), blood urea nitrogen, and abnormal urinalysis findings. Symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA) is a novel kidney biomarker that reflects glomerular filtration rate, increasing earlier than sCr with acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease. This prospective study compared accuracy and precision of two commercial SDMA assays, the IDEXX SDMA Test and the DLD SDMA ELISA, relative to the established reference method, liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC-MS). Thirty canine and 30 feline pooled serum samples were used to evaluate accuracy compared to LC-MS. Pooled canine samples with a low SDMA concentration and pooled feline samples with a high SDMA concentration were used to evaluate precision. Using a best fit linear model, the IDEXX SDMA Test resulted in a slope of 1.06 and an intercept of 0.34, with R(2) = 0.99, and the DLD SDMA ELISA resulted in a slope of 0.37 and an intercept of 11.33, with R(2) = 0.27, when compared to LC-MS. Estimated bias over a clinically relevant range for SDMA (10–45 μg/dL) was 1–2 μg/dL for the IDEXX SDMA Test, while DLD SDMA ELISA showed considerable bias, 5–8 μg/dL. Day-to-day precision analysis of the low SDMA concentration samples showed 7.7% total coefficient of variation (CV) for the IDEXX SDMA Test and 31.1% for the DLD SDMA ELISA. For the high SDMA concentration samples, total CV was 2.3% for the IDEXX SDMA Test and 28.2% for the DLD SDMA ELISA. In this study the IDEXX SDMA Test was more accurate and more precise in macroscopically normal serum than the DLD SDMA ELISA when compared to the reference method of LC-MS. The IDEXX SDMA Test is more suitable for clinical use in the diagnosis and monitoring of kidney disease in dogs and cats.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6188631
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61886312018-10-26 Comparative performance of IDEXX SDMA Test and the DLD SDMA ELISA for the measurement of SDMA in canine and feline serum Ernst, Rie Ogeer, Jennifer McCrann, Donald Cross, Julie Strong-Townsend, Marilyn Friis, Hanne Coyne, Michael Clements, Celeste Drake, Corie Murphy, Rachel PLoS One Research Article Kidney disease is common in companion animals, and traditionally diagnosed with serum creatinine concentration (sCr), blood urea nitrogen, and abnormal urinalysis findings. Symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA) is a novel kidney biomarker that reflects glomerular filtration rate, increasing earlier than sCr with acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease. This prospective study compared accuracy and precision of two commercial SDMA assays, the IDEXX SDMA Test and the DLD SDMA ELISA, relative to the established reference method, liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC-MS). Thirty canine and 30 feline pooled serum samples were used to evaluate accuracy compared to LC-MS. Pooled canine samples with a low SDMA concentration and pooled feline samples with a high SDMA concentration were used to evaluate precision. Using a best fit linear model, the IDEXX SDMA Test resulted in a slope of 1.06 and an intercept of 0.34, with R(2) = 0.99, and the DLD SDMA ELISA resulted in a slope of 0.37 and an intercept of 11.33, with R(2) = 0.27, when compared to LC-MS. Estimated bias over a clinically relevant range for SDMA (10–45 μg/dL) was 1–2 μg/dL for the IDEXX SDMA Test, while DLD SDMA ELISA showed considerable bias, 5–8 μg/dL. Day-to-day precision analysis of the low SDMA concentration samples showed 7.7% total coefficient of variation (CV) for the IDEXX SDMA Test and 31.1% for the DLD SDMA ELISA. For the high SDMA concentration samples, total CV was 2.3% for the IDEXX SDMA Test and 28.2% for the DLD SDMA ELISA. In this study the IDEXX SDMA Test was more accurate and more precise in macroscopically normal serum than the DLD SDMA ELISA when compared to the reference method of LC-MS. The IDEXX SDMA Test is more suitable for clinical use in the diagnosis and monitoring of kidney disease in dogs and cats. Public Library of Science 2018-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6188631/ /pubmed/30321185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205030 Text en © 2018 Ernst et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ernst, Rie
Ogeer, Jennifer
McCrann, Donald
Cross, Julie
Strong-Townsend, Marilyn
Friis, Hanne
Coyne, Michael
Clements, Celeste
Drake, Corie
Murphy, Rachel
Comparative performance of IDEXX SDMA Test and the DLD SDMA ELISA for the measurement of SDMA in canine and feline serum
title Comparative performance of IDEXX SDMA Test and the DLD SDMA ELISA for the measurement of SDMA in canine and feline serum
title_full Comparative performance of IDEXX SDMA Test and the DLD SDMA ELISA for the measurement of SDMA in canine and feline serum
title_fullStr Comparative performance of IDEXX SDMA Test and the DLD SDMA ELISA for the measurement of SDMA in canine and feline serum
title_full_unstemmed Comparative performance of IDEXX SDMA Test and the DLD SDMA ELISA for the measurement of SDMA in canine and feline serum
title_short Comparative performance of IDEXX SDMA Test and the DLD SDMA ELISA for the measurement of SDMA in canine and feline serum
title_sort comparative performance of idexx sdma test and the dld sdma elisa for the measurement of sdma in canine and feline serum
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6188631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30321185
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205030
work_keys_str_mv AT ernstrie comparativeperformanceofidexxsdmatestandthedldsdmaelisaforthemeasurementofsdmaincanineandfelineserum
AT ogeerjennifer comparativeperformanceofidexxsdmatestandthedldsdmaelisaforthemeasurementofsdmaincanineandfelineserum
AT mccranndonald comparativeperformanceofidexxsdmatestandthedldsdmaelisaforthemeasurementofsdmaincanineandfelineserum
AT crossjulie comparativeperformanceofidexxsdmatestandthedldsdmaelisaforthemeasurementofsdmaincanineandfelineserum
AT strongtownsendmarilyn comparativeperformanceofidexxsdmatestandthedldsdmaelisaforthemeasurementofsdmaincanineandfelineserum
AT friishanne comparativeperformanceofidexxsdmatestandthedldsdmaelisaforthemeasurementofsdmaincanineandfelineserum
AT coynemichael comparativeperformanceofidexxsdmatestandthedldsdmaelisaforthemeasurementofsdmaincanineandfelineserum
AT clementsceleste comparativeperformanceofidexxsdmatestandthedldsdmaelisaforthemeasurementofsdmaincanineandfelineserum
AT drakecorie comparativeperformanceofidexxsdmatestandthedldsdmaelisaforthemeasurementofsdmaincanineandfelineserum
AT murphyrachel comparativeperformanceofidexxsdmatestandthedldsdmaelisaforthemeasurementofsdmaincanineandfelineserum