Cargando…

Is the COPD Assessment Test sensitive for differentiating COPD patients from active smokers and nonsmokers without lung function impairment? A population-based study

OBJECTIVE: To assess COPD Assessment Test (CAT) scores in adults with and without COPD, as well as to compare the CAT scores for nonsmokers, former smokers, and smokers without COPD with those for patients with COPD. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional population-based study (the Respira Floripa stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karloh, Manuela, Rocha, Simone Aparecida Vieira, Pizzichini, Marcia Margaret Menezes, Cavalli, Francine, Matte, Darlan Laurício, Pizzichini, Emilio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6188678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30043888
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-37562017000000149
_version_ 1783363221552365568
author Karloh, Manuela
Rocha, Simone Aparecida Vieira
Pizzichini, Marcia Margaret Menezes
Cavalli, Francine
Matte, Darlan Laurício
Pizzichini, Emilio
author_facet Karloh, Manuela
Rocha, Simone Aparecida Vieira
Pizzichini, Marcia Margaret Menezes
Cavalli, Francine
Matte, Darlan Laurício
Pizzichini, Emilio
author_sort Karloh, Manuela
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess COPD Assessment Test (CAT) scores in adults with and without COPD, as well as to compare the CAT scores for nonsmokers, former smokers, and smokers without COPD with those for patients with COPD. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional population-based study (the Respira Floripa study). The study included adults ≥ 40 years of age residing in the city of Florianópolis, Brazil. A total of 846 households were surveyed. In addition to completing the Respira Floripa questionnaire and the CAT, participants underwent pulmonary function testing. RESULTS: We analyzed data on 1,057 participants (88.1% of the predicted sample size). A functional diagnosis of COPD was made in 92 participants (8.7%). Of those, 72% were unaware that they had COPD. The mean CAT score was higher in the group of COPD patients than in that of individuals without COPD (10.6 [95% CI: 8.8-12.4] vs. 6.6 [95% CI: 6.1-7.0]; p < 0.01). Individual item scores were significantly higher in the patients with COPD than in the individuals without COPD (p < 0.001), the exception being the scores for the items related to sleep (p = 0.13) and energy (p = 0.08). The mean CAT score was higher in the group of COPD patients than in nonsmokers (5.8 [95% CI: 5.3-6.4]) and former smokers (6.4 [95% CI: 5.6-7.2]; p < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences in the mean CAT score between the group of COPD patients and smokers without COPD (9.5 [95% CI: 8.2-10.8]; p > 0.05), the exception being the mean scores for confidence leaving home (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: CAT scores were higher in the group of patients with COPD than in nonsmokers and former smokers without COPD. However, there were no significant differences in CAT scores between COPD patients and smokers without COPD. Smokers with an FEV(1)/FVC ratio > 0.70 have impaired health status and respiratory symptoms similar to those observed in COPD patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6188678
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61886782018-10-18 Is the COPD Assessment Test sensitive for differentiating COPD patients from active smokers and nonsmokers without lung function impairment? A population-based study Karloh, Manuela Rocha, Simone Aparecida Vieira Pizzichini, Marcia Margaret Menezes Cavalli, Francine Matte, Darlan Laurício Pizzichini, Emilio J Bras Pneumol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To assess COPD Assessment Test (CAT) scores in adults with and without COPD, as well as to compare the CAT scores for nonsmokers, former smokers, and smokers without COPD with those for patients with COPD. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional population-based study (the Respira Floripa study). The study included adults ≥ 40 years of age residing in the city of Florianópolis, Brazil. A total of 846 households were surveyed. In addition to completing the Respira Floripa questionnaire and the CAT, participants underwent pulmonary function testing. RESULTS: We analyzed data on 1,057 participants (88.1% of the predicted sample size). A functional diagnosis of COPD was made in 92 participants (8.7%). Of those, 72% were unaware that they had COPD. The mean CAT score was higher in the group of COPD patients than in that of individuals without COPD (10.6 [95% CI: 8.8-12.4] vs. 6.6 [95% CI: 6.1-7.0]; p < 0.01). Individual item scores were significantly higher in the patients with COPD than in the individuals without COPD (p < 0.001), the exception being the scores for the items related to sleep (p = 0.13) and energy (p = 0.08). The mean CAT score was higher in the group of COPD patients than in nonsmokers (5.8 [95% CI: 5.3-6.4]) and former smokers (6.4 [95% CI: 5.6-7.2]; p < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences in the mean CAT score between the group of COPD patients and smokers without COPD (9.5 [95% CI: 8.2-10.8]; p > 0.05), the exception being the mean scores for confidence leaving home (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: CAT scores were higher in the group of patients with COPD than in nonsmokers and former smokers without COPD. However, there were no significant differences in CAT scores between COPD patients and smokers without COPD. Smokers with an FEV(1)/FVC ratio > 0.70 have impaired health status and respiratory symptoms similar to those observed in COPD patients. Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6188678/ /pubmed/30043888 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-37562017000000149 Text en Copyright © 2018 Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
spellingShingle Original Article
Karloh, Manuela
Rocha, Simone Aparecida Vieira
Pizzichini, Marcia Margaret Menezes
Cavalli, Francine
Matte, Darlan Laurício
Pizzichini, Emilio
Is the COPD Assessment Test sensitive for differentiating COPD patients from active smokers and nonsmokers without lung function impairment? A population-based study
title Is the COPD Assessment Test sensitive for differentiating COPD patients from active smokers and nonsmokers without lung function impairment? A population-based study
title_full Is the COPD Assessment Test sensitive for differentiating COPD patients from active smokers and nonsmokers without lung function impairment? A population-based study
title_fullStr Is the COPD Assessment Test sensitive for differentiating COPD patients from active smokers and nonsmokers without lung function impairment? A population-based study
title_full_unstemmed Is the COPD Assessment Test sensitive for differentiating COPD patients from active smokers and nonsmokers without lung function impairment? A population-based study
title_short Is the COPD Assessment Test sensitive for differentiating COPD patients from active smokers and nonsmokers without lung function impairment? A population-based study
title_sort is the copd assessment test sensitive for differentiating copd patients from active smokers and nonsmokers without lung function impairment? a population-based study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6188678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30043888
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-37562017000000149
work_keys_str_mv AT karlohmanuela isthecopdassessmenttestsensitivefordifferentiatingcopdpatientsfromactivesmokersandnonsmokerswithoutlungfunctionimpairmentapopulationbasedstudy
AT rochasimoneaparecidavieira isthecopdassessmenttestsensitivefordifferentiatingcopdpatientsfromactivesmokersandnonsmokerswithoutlungfunctionimpairmentapopulationbasedstudy
AT pizzichinimarciamargaretmenezes isthecopdassessmenttestsensitivefordifferentiatingcopdpatientsfromactivesmokersandnonsmokerswithoutlungfunctionimpairmentapopulationbasedstudy
AT cavallifrancine isthecopdassessmenttestsensitivefordifferentiatingcopdpatientsfromactivesmokersandnonsmokerswithoutlungfunctionimpairmentapopulationbasedstudy
AT mattedarlanlauricio isthecopdassessmenttestsensitivefordifferentiatingcopdpatientsfromactivesmokersandnonsmokerswithoutlungfunctionimpairmentapopulationbasedstudy
AT pizzichiniemilio isthecopdassessmenttestsensitivefordifferentiatingcopdpatientsfromactivesmokersandnonsmokerswithoutlungfunctionimpairmentapopulationbasedstudy
AT isthecopdassessmenttestsensitivefordifferentiatingcopdpatientsfromactivesmokersandnonsmokerswithoutlungfunctionimpairmentapopulationbasedstudy