Cargando…
Comparative Antiviral Efficacy of Generic Sofosbuvir versus Brand Name Sofosbuvir with Ribavirin for the Treatment of Hepatitis C
BACKGROUND: Chronic hepatitis C infection is a major cause for liver failure and liver cancer and can be treated with highly effective all oral directly acting antiviral (DAA) drugs. Generic versions of these DAAs are available in India. METHOD: This was an open-label, single-center, prospective, no...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6188723/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30364048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9124604 |
_version_ | 1783363229547757568 |
---|---|
author | Tang, L. Kamat, M. Shukla, A. Vora, M. Kalal, C. Kottilil, S. Shah, S. |
author_facet | Tang, L. Kamat, M. Shukla, A. Vora, M. Kalal, C. Kottilil, S. Shah, S. |
author_sort | Tang, L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Chronic hepatitis C infection is a major cause for liver failure and liver cancer and can be treated with highly effective all oral directly acting antiviral (DAA) drugs. Generic versions of these DAAs are available in India. METHOD: This was an open-label, single-center, prospective, nonrandomized observational study for the comparative safety and efficacy of generic versus brand name sofosbuvir with ribavirin therapy for chronic hepatitis C infection (all genotypes). Between December 2014 and December 2015, 66 patients received either generic sofosbuvir (400mg) or brand name SOLVALDI (400mg) with weight based ribavirin for 24 weeks in a single multispecialty hospital in Mumbai. Monitoring viral loads and safety labs was performed as per national guidelines. RESULTS: Sustained virologic response was 72.4% versus 75.7% (p=0.78) among patients treated with generics and SOVALDI, respectively. At 4 weeks on-treatment, approximately 90% of patients from both groups had undetectable or below the lower limit of quantification. Change in hemoglobin was comparable in both groups (p=0.26). CONCLUSION: Generic versions of sofosbuvir reported in this study are safe and efficacious to treat hepatitis C. However, bioequivalency studies of all generic DAAs need to be performed before wider use of such drugs for the treatment of hepatitis C. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6188723 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61887232018-10-25 Comparative Antiviral Efficacy of Generic Sofosbuvir versus Brand Name Sofosbuvir with Ribavirin for the Treatment of Hepatitis C Tang, L. Kamat, M. Shukla, A. Vora, M. Kalal, C. Kottilil, S. Shah, S. Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Chronic hepatitis C infection is a major cause for liver failure and liver cancer and can be treated with highly effective all oral directly acting antiviral (DAA) drugs. Generic versions of these DAAs are available in India. METHOD: This was an open-label, single-center, prospective, nonrandomized observational study for the comparative safety and efficacy of generic versus brand name sofosbuvir with ribavirin therapy for chronic hepatitis C infection (all genotypes). Between December 2014 and December 2015, 66 patients received either generic sofosbuvir (400mg) or brand name SOLVALDI (400mg) with weight based ribavirin for 24 weeks in a single multispecialty hospital in Mumbai. Monitoring viral loads and safety labs was performed as per national guidelines. RESULTS: Sustained virologic response was 72.4% versus 75.7% (p=0.78) among patients treated with generics and SOVALDI, respectively. At 4 weeks on-treatment, approximately 90% of patients from both groups had undetectable or below the lower limit of quantification. Change in hemoglobin was comparable in both groups (p=0.26). CONCLUSION: Generic versions of sofosbuvir reported in this study are safe and efficacious to treat hepatitis C. However, bioequivalency studies of all generic DAAs need to be performed before wider use of such drugs for the treatment of hepatitis C. Hindawi 2018-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6188723/ /pubmed/30364048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9124604 Text en Copyright © 2018 L. Tang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Tang, L. Kamat, M. Shukla, A. Vora, M. Kalal, C. Kottilil, S. Shah, S. Comparative Antiviral Efficacy of Generic Sofosbuvir versus Brand Name Sofosbuvir with Ribavirin for the Treatment of Hepatitis C |
title | Comparative Antiviral Efficacy of Generic Sofosbuvir versus Brand Name Sofosbuvir with Ribavirin for the Treatment of Hepatitis C |
title_full | Comparative Antiviral Efficacy of Generic Sofosbuvir versus Brand Name Sofosbuvir with Ribavirin for the Treatment of Hepatitis C |
title_fullStr | Comparative Antiviral Efficacy of Generic Sofosbuvir versus Brand Name Sofosbuvir with Ribavirin for the Treatment of Hepatitis C |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Antiviral Efficacy of Generic Sofosbuvir versus Brand Name Sofosbuvir with Ribavirin for the Treatment of Hepatitis C |
title_short | Comparative Antiviral Efficacy of Generic Sofosbuvir versus Brand Name Sofosbuvir with Ribavirin for the Treatment of Hepatitis C |
title_sort | comparative antiviral efficacy of generic sofosbuvir versus brand name sofosbuvir with ribavirin for the treatment of hepatitis c |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6188723/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30364048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9124604 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tangl comparativeantiviralefficacyofgenericsofosbuvirversusbrandnamesofosbuvirwithribavirinforthetreatmentofhepatitisc AT kamatm comparativeantiviralefficacyofgenericsofosbuvirversusbrandnamesofosbuvirwithribavirinforthetreatmentofhepatitisc AT shuklaa comparativeantiviralefficacyofgenericsofosbuvirversusbrandnamesofosbuvirwithribavirinforthetreatmentofhepatitisc AT voram comparativeantiviralefficacyofgenericsofosbuvirversusbrandnamesofosbuvirwithribavirinforthetreatmentofhepatitisc AT kalalc comparativeantiviralefficacyofgenericsofosbuvirversusbrandnamesofosbuvirwithribavirinforthetreatmentofhepatitisc AT kottilils comparativeantiviralefficacyofgenericsofosbuvirversusbrandnamesofosbuvirwithribavirinforthetreatmentofhepatitisc AT shahs comparativeantiviralefficacyofgenericsofosbuvirversusbrandnamesofosbuvirwithribavirinforthetreatmentofhepatitisc |