Cargando…

Are we too far from being client centered?

BACKGROUND: Quality of service provision in health facilities is fundamental to ensure effective care. However, women’s actual experience of care is often neglected. OBJECTIVE: To assess perceived quality of institutional delivery services and associated factors among women who delivered in public h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Erchafo, Belay, Alaro, Tesfamichael, Tsega, Gebeyehu, Adamu, Ayinengida, Yitbarek, Kiddus, Siraneh, Yibeltal, Hailu, Meaza, Woldie, Mirkuzie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6188795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30321212
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205681
_version_ 1783363245508132864
author Erchafo, Belay
Alaro, Tesfamichael
Tsega, Gebeyehu
Adamu, Ayinengida
Yitbarek, Kiddus
Siraneh, Yibeltal
Hailu, Meaza
Woldie, Mirkuzie
author_facet Erchafo, Belay
Alaro, Tesfamichael
Tsega, Gebeyehu
Adamu, Ayinengida
Yitbarek, Kiddus
Siraneh, Yibeltal
Hailu, Meaza
Woldie, Mirkuzie
author_sort Erchafo, Belay
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Quality of service provision in health facilities is fundamental to ensure effective care. However, women’s actual experience of care is often neglected. OBJECTIVE: To assess perceived quality of institutional delivery services and associated factors among women who delivered in public health facilities of Southwest Ethiopia. METHOD: Community based cross-sectional study was conducted in three districts of Jimma zone, Southwestern Ethiopia, from February 29 to March 20, 2016. A total of 423 mothers who delivered in public health facilities during the last 12 months were selected to participate in the study. Study participants were identified using simple random sampling procedure. Principal component analysis was used to generate scores for three sub-dimensions of perceived quality. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of these sub-dimensions. RESULTS: Perceived quality of institutional delivery services was measured with three dimensions: perceived interpersonal interaction, health care delivery and health facility/structure. We found that perceived quality of interpersonal interaction was negatively affected by educational level (read and write) (β: -0.331, 95% CI: -0.523, -0.140), urban residence (β: -0.485, 95% CI: -0.696, -0.275), antenatal care (less than three visits) (β: -0.238, 95% CI: -0.419,-0.056) and delivery service attended by male provider (β: -1.286, 95% CI: -1.463,-1.109). Perceived quality of health care delivery was negatively associated with still birth (β: -0.642, 95% CI: -1.092,-0.193) and delivery services attended by male provider (β: -0.689, 95% CI: -0.907,-0.472). Urban residence (β: -0.260, 95% CI: -0.515,-0.005), and antenatal care (less than three visits) (β: -0.394, 95% CI: -0.628,-0.161) were negatively associated with perceived quality of health facility/structure. CONCLUSION: Overall, the perceived quality of institutional delivery services was low. We recommend that health managers and health care providers jointly work to transform birth care at the health facilities to deliver person-centered care. Addressing the preferences of clients is as important as taking care of structural concerns pinpointed in this study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6188795
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61887952018-10-25 Are we too far from being client centered? Erchafo, Belay Alaro, Tesfamichael Tsega, Gebeyehu Adamu, Ayinengida Yitbarek, Kiddus Siraneh, Yibeltal Hailu, Meaza Woldie, Mirkuzie PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Quality of service provision in health facilities is fundamental to ensure effective care. However, women’s actual experience of care is often neglected. OBJECTIVE: To assess perceived quality of institutional delivery services and associated factors among women who delivered in public health facilities of Southwest Ethiopia. METHOD: Community based cross-sectional study was conducted in three districts of Jimma zone, Southwestern Ethiopia, from February 29 to March 20, 2016. A total of 423 mothers who delivered in public health facilities during the last 12 months were selected to participate in the study. Study participants were identified using simple random sampling procedure. Principal component analysis was used to generate scores for three sub-dimensions of perceived quality. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of these sub-dimensions. RESULTS: Perceived quality of institutional delivery services was measured with three dimensions: perceived interpersonal interaction, health care delivery and health facility/structure. We found that perceived quality of interpersonal interaction was negatively affected by educational level (read and write) (β: -0.331, 95% CI: -0.523, -0.140), urban residence (β: -0.485, 95% CI: -0.696, -0.275), antenatal care (less than three visits) (β: -0.238, 95% CI: -0.419,-0.056) and delivery service attended by male provider (β: -1.286, 95% CI: -1.463,-1.109). Perceived quality of health care delivery was negatively associated with still birth (β: -0.642, 95% CI: -1.092,-0.193) and delivery services attended by male provider (β: -0.689, 95% CI: -0.907,-0.472). Urban residence (β: -0.260, 95% CI: -0.515,-0.005), and antenatal care (less than three visits) (β: -0.394, 95% CI: -0.628,-0.161) were negatively associated with perceived quality of health facility/structure. CONCLUSION: Overall, the perceived quality of institutional delivery services was low. We recommend that health managers and health care providers jointly work to transform birth care at the health facilities to deliver person-centered care. Addressing the preferences of clients is as important as taking care of structural concerns pinpointed in this study. Public Library of Science 2018-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6188795/ /pubmed/30321212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205681 Text en © 2018 Erchafo et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Erchafo, Belay
Alaro, Tesfamichael
Tsega, Gebeyehu
Adamu, Ayinengida
Yitbarek, Kiddus
Siraneh, Yibeltal
Hailu, Meaza
Woldie, Mirkuzie
Are we too far from being client centered?
title Are we too far from being client centered?
title_full Are we too far from being client centered?
title_fullStr Are we too far from being client centered?
title_full_unstemmed Are we too far from being client centered?
title_short Are we too far from being client centered?
title_sort are we too far from being client centered?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6188795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30321212
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205681
work_keys_str_mv AT erchafobelay arewetoofarfrombeingclientcentered
AT alarotesfamichael arewetoofarfrombeingclientcentered
AT tsegagebeyehu arewetoofarfrombeingclientcentered
AT adamuayinengida arewetoofarfrombeingclientcentered
AT yitbarekkiddus arewetoofarfrombeingclientcentered
AT siranehyibeltal arewetoofarfrombeingclientcentered
AT hailumeaza arewetoofarfrombeingclientcentered
AT woldiemirkuzie arewetoofarfrombeingclientcentered